Suppr超能文献

欧洲和美国的健康管理教育:比较性综述与分析

Health management education in Europe and in the United States: a comparative review and analysis.

作者信息

Weil Thomas P

机构信息

Asheville, NC, USA

出版信息

Health Serv Manage Res. 2013 Aug;26(2-3):76-85. doi: 10.1177/0951484813512288.

Abstract

In Europe and in the United States, health management education and the role of health managers are patterned and consistent with how the country's healthcare system is organized, managed, and financed. In the United States, the fee-for-service, entrepreneurial dominated approach, resulting in health being one of the few remaining growth industries, has created a huge demand for additional health management education programs and managers. Therefore, universities finding themselves in an economic slump are attracted to establish health services administration programs (a North American term) since they require limited capital, continue to attract enrollment, and contribute to the "social good." In contrast, the European countries' healthcare systems provide universal access to care and strict, governmental fiscal control on healthcare expenditures. As a result, the American masters-level health manager model has not thrived there--although not willingly conceded is the fact that in Europe physicians continue to dominate the management ranks. After outlining a number of the current problems facing US health management education, this article focuses on: (1) a projected shuttering of the weaker American health management programs and the market for health managers being overly saturated (such as for lawyers now), because the US gross domestic product expenditures for health will decrease over the next two decades from the current level of 17.6% to be somewhat comparable to the 11.5% in Canada, France, and Germany; and (2) a projected increase in the enrollment among European health management programs for several reasons: (a) a huge spike in the demand for additional clinically oriented, health managers who can trade off concerns of cost versus quality; and (b) the constraints of most countries' statutory health insurance plans will become increasingly more evident so that privatization of healthcare services will become an option for those with above average incomes and, thereby, generate a demand for newly minted health managers similar to the US masters-level graduate.

摘要

在欧洲和美国,健康管理教育以及健康管理者的角色与该国医疗保健系统的组织、管理和融资方式是相适应且一致的。在美国,按服务收费、以企业为主导的模式使得医疗保健成为少数几个仍在增长的行业之一,这就对额外的健康管理教育项目和管理者产生了巨大需求。因此,处于经济衰退中的大学被吸引去开设健康服务管理项目(一个北美术语),因为这些项目所需资金有限,能持续吸引学生入学,还能带来“社会效益”。相比之下,欧洲国家的医疗保健系统提供全民医疗服务,并对医疗保健支出进行严格的政府财政控制。结果,美国硕士水平的健康管理者模式在欧洲并未蓬勃发展——尽管欧洲不太愿意承认的一个事实是,在欧洲,医生仍在管理岗位中占据主导地位。在概述了美国健康管理教育目前面临的一些问题之后,本文重点关注:(1)预计美国一些较弱的健康管理项目将会关闭,健康管理者市场将过度饱和(就像现在的律师市场一样),因为美国国内生产总值中用于医疗保健的支出在未来二十年将从目前的17.6%降至与加拿大、法国和德国的11.5%大致相当的水平;(2)预计欧洲健康管理项目的入学人数将增加,原因如下:(a)对更多能够权衡成本与质量问题的临床导向型健康管理者的需求大幅飙升;(b)大多数国家法定医疗保险计划的限制将日益明显,因此医疗服务私有化将成为高收入人群的一个选择,从而产生对类似于美国硕士水平毕业生的新晋健康管理者的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验