Lisboa Sabrina F, Borges Anna A, Nejo Priscila, Fassini Aline, Guimarães Francisco S, Resstel Leonardo B
Pharmacology Department, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo (FMRP/USP), Brazil; Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Applied Neurosciences (NAPNA), University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Pharmacology Department, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto - University of São Paulo (FMRP/USP), Brazil; Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Applied Neurosciences (NAPNA), University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jun 3;59:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
Endocannabinoids (ECBs) such as anandamide (AEA) act by activating cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) or 2 (CB2) receptors. The anxiolytic effect of drugs that facilitate ECB effects is associated with increase in AEA levels in several encephalic areas, including the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Activation of CB1 receptors by CB1 agonists injected directly into these areas is usually anxiolytic. However, depending on the encephalic region being investigated and on the stressful experiences, opposite effects were observed, as reported in the ventral HIP. In addition, contradictory results have been reported after CB1 activation in the dorsal HIP (dHIP). Therefore, in the present paper we have attempted to verify if directly interfering with ECB metabolism/reuptake in the prelimbic (PL) portion of the medial PFC (MPFC) and dHIP would produce different effects in two conceptually distinct animal models: the elevated plus maze (EPM) and the Vogel conflict test (VCT). We observed that drugs which interfere with ECB reuptake/metabolism in both the PL and in the dentate gyrus of the dHIP induced anxiolytic-like effect, in both the EPM and in the VCT via CB1 receptors, suggesting that CB1 signaling in these brain regions modulates defensive responses to both innate and learned threatening stimuli. This data further strengthens previous results indicating modulation of hippocampal and MPFC activity via CB1 by ECBs, which could be therapeutically targeted to treat anxiety disorders.
内源性大麻素(ECB),如花生四烯乙醇胺(AEA),通过激活1型(CB1)或2型(CB2)大麻素受体发挥作用。促进ECB作用的药物的抗焦虑作用与包括前额叶皮质(PFC)在内的几个脑区中AEA水平的升高有关。直接注射到这些区域的CB1激动剂激活CB1受体通常具有抗焦虑作用。然而,根据所研究的脑区和应激经历的不同,会观察到相反的效果,如在腹侧海马体(HIP)中所报道的那样。此外,在背侧海马体(dHIP)中激活CB1后也报道了相互矛盾的结果。因此,在本论文中,我们试图验证直接干扰内侧前额叶皮质(MPFC)的前边缘(PL)部分和dHIP中的ECB代谢/再摄取,在两种概念上不同的动物模型:高架十字迷宫(EPM)和Vogel冲突试验(VCT)中是否会产生不同的效果。我们观察到,干扰PL和dHIP齿状回中ECB再摄取/代谢的药物,在EPM和VCT中均通过CB1受体诱导出抗焦虑样作用,这表明这些脑区中的CB1信号传导调节对先天和习得性威胁刺激的防御反应。该数据进一步强化了先前的结果,表明ECB通过CB1对海马体和MPFC活动进行调节,这可能成为治疗焦虑症的治疗靶点。