dePersio S, Utterback P L, Utterback C W, Rochell S J, O'Sullivan N, Bregendahl K, Arango J, Parsons C M, Koelkebeck K W
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
Hy-Line International, Dallas Center, IA 50063.
Poult Sci. 2015 Feb;94(2):195-206. doi: 10.3382/ps/peu044. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of feeding 5 different energy and nutrient dense diets to Hy-Line W-36 hens on long-term performance and economics. A total of 480 19 wk old Hy-Line W-36 Single Comb White Leghorn hens were weighed and randomly allocated to 6 replicate groups of 16 hens each (2 adjacent cages containing 8 hens per cage, 60.9×58.4 cm) per dietary treatment in a randomized complete block design. The hens were fed 5 treatment diets formulated to contain 85, 90, 95, 100, and 105% of the energy and nutrient recommendations stated in the 2009 Hy-Line Variety W-36 Commercial Management Guide. Production performance was measured for 52 wk from 19 to 70 wk age. Over the course of the trial, a significant increasing linear response to increasing energy and nutrient density was seen for hen-day egg production, egg weight, egg mass, feed efficiency, energy intake, and body weight (BW). Feed intake showed no significant linear level response to increasing energy and nutrient density except during the early production cycle. No consistent responses were noted for egg quality, percent yolk, and percent egg solids throughout the study. Significant linear responses due to energy and nutrient density were seen for egg income, feed cost, and income minus feed cost. In general, as energy and nutrient density increased, egg income and feed cost per hen increased, but income minus feed cost decreased. Overall, these results indicate that feeding Hy-Line W-36 hens increasing energy and nutrient-dense diets will increase egg production, egg weight, egg mass, feed efficiency, energy intake, BW, egg income, and feed cost, but decrease egg income minus feed cost. However, these benefits do not take effect in early production and seem to be most effective in later stages of the production cycle, perhaps "priming" the birds for better egg-production persistency with age.
本研究的目的是评估给海兰W-36母鸡饲喂5种不同能量和营养密度日粮对其长期生产性能和经济效益的影响。总共480只19周龄的海兰W-36单冠白来航母鸡称体重后,按随机完全区组设计,每个日粮处理随机分配到6个重复组,每组16只母鸡(相邻的2个笼子,每个笼子装8只母鸡,笼子尺寸为60.9×58.4厘米)。给母鸡饲喂5种处理日粮,其能量和营养含量分别为2009年海兰W-36商业管理指南中推荐量的85%、90%、95%、100%和105%。在19至70周龄期间测定52周的生产性能。在试验过程中,母鸡日产蛋量、蛋重、产蛋量、饲料效率、能量摄入量和体重(BW)对能量和营养密度增加呈现显著的线性增加反应。除了在产蛋初期,采食量对能量和营养密度增加未呈现显著的线性反应。在整个研究过程中,蛋品质、蛋黄百分比和蛋固形物百分比未观察到一致的反应。蛋收入、饲料成本和收入减去饲料成本对能量和营养密度呈现显著的线性反应。总体而言,随着能量和营养密度增加,每只母鸡的蛋收入和饲料成本增加,但收入减去饲料成本减少。总的来说,这些结果表明,给海兰W-36母鸡饲喂能量和营养密度增加的日粮会增加产蛋量、蛋重、产蛋量、饲料效率、能量摄入量、体重、蛋收入和饲料成本,但会降低蛋收入减去饲料成本。然而,这些益处不会在产蛋初期显现,似乎在生产周期后期最有效,可能是使母鸡随着年龄增长产蛋持续性更好。