Figueroa David, Figueroa Francisco, Calvo Rafael, Vaisman Alex, Ahumada Ximena, Arellano Sergio
Knee Unit, Orthopaedics Department, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Knee Unit, Orthopaedics Department, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Arthroscopy. 2015 May;31(5):981-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
To systematically review the current literature for evidence that would substantiate the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures.
We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Embase of studies written in the English and Spanish languages that compared the use of PRP with a control group in patients with ACL injuries assessing graft-to-bone healing, graft maturation, and/or clinical outcomes and were randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies.
Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising 516 patients (266 ACL reconstructions using PRP and 250 ACL reconstructions without PRP). Six studies reported a statistically significant difference (4 studies) or tendency toward faster graft maturation in the platelet group (2 studies). One study found no differences. Regarding tunnel healing/widening, 1 study showed faster healing in the PRP group and 5 studies showed no differences between the 2 groups. Considering clinical outcomes, 1 study showed better clinical outcomes with PRP use and 5 studies showed no benefits with the use of PRP.
Concerning ACL graft maturation, there is promising evidence that the addition of PRP could be a synergic factor in acquiring maturity more quickly than grafts with no PRP, with the clinical implication of this remaining unclear. Regarding tunnel healing, it appears that there is not an improvement with the addition of PRP. There is no proof that clinical outcomes of ACL surgery are enhanced by the use of PRP.
Level III, systematic review of Level I through III studies.
系统回顾当前文献,寻找能证实使用富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂的证据。
我们在PubMed和Embase数据库中进行了系统检索,纳入英文和西班牙文撰写的研究,这些研究比较了PRP在ACL损伤患者中的应用与对照组,评估移植物与骨的愈合、移植物成熟度和/或临床结果,且为随机对照试验或前瞻性队列研究。
11项研究符合纳入标准,共516例患者(266例使用PRP进行ACL重建,250例未使用PRP进行ACL重建)。6项研究报告了血小板组有统计学显著差异(4项研究)或有更快移植物成熟的趋势(2项研究)。1项研究未发现差异。关于隧道愈合/增宽,1项研究显示PRP组愈合更快,5项研究显示两组间无差异。考虑临床结果,1项研究显示使用PRP临床结果更好,5项研究显示使用PRP无益处。
关于ACL移植物成熟度,有前景的证据表明,添加PRP可能是比未添加PRP的移植物更快成熟的协同因素,但其临床意义尚不清楚。关于隧道愈合,添加PRP似乎并无改善。没有证据表明使用PRP能提高ACL手术的临床结果。
III级,对I级至III级研究的系统评价。