Inácio Pedro, Airaksinen Marja, Cavaco Afonso
Clinical Pharmacy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Finland.
iMed.ULisboa Research Institute for Medicines and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):664-74. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
The description of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by health care professionals (HCPs) can be highly variable. This variation can affect the coding of a reaction with the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA(®)), the gold standard for pharmacovigilance database entries. Ultimately, the strength of a safety signal can be compromised.
The objective of this study was to assess: 1) participation of different HCPs in ADR reporting, and 2) variation of language used by HCPs when describing ADRs, and to compare it with the corresponding MedDRA(®) codes.
A retrospective content analysis was performed, using the database of spontaneous reports submitted by HCPs in the region of the Southern Pharmacovigilance Unit, Portugal. Data retrieved consisted of the idiomatic description of all ADRs occurring in 2004 (first year of the Unit activity, n = 53) and in 2012 (n = 350). The agreement between the language used by HCPs and the MedDRA(®) dictionary codes was quantitatively assessed.
From a total of 403 spontaneous reports received in the two years, 896 words describing ADRs were collected. HCPs presented different levels of pharmacovigilance participation and ADR idiomatic descriptions, with pharmacists providing the greatest overall contribution. The agreement between the language used in spontaneous reports and the corresponding MedDRA(®) terms varied by HCP background, with nurses presenting the poorer results than medical doctors and pharmacists when considering the dictionary as the gold standard in ADRs' language.
Lexical accuracy and semantic variations exist between different HCP groups. These differences may interfere with the strength of a generated safety signal. Clinical and MedDRA(®) terminology training should be targeted to increase not only the frequency, but also the quality of spontaneous reports, in accordance with HCPs' experience and background.
医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对药物不良反应(ADRs)的描述可能差异很大。这种差异会影响使用监管活动医学词典(MedDRA(®))对反应进行编码,而MedDRA(®)是药物警戒数据库条目的金标准。最终,安全信号的强度可能会受到影响。
本研究的目的是评估:1)不同医疗保健专业人员参与药物不良反应报告的情况,以及2)医疗保健专业人员在描述药物不良反应时所用语言的差异,并将其与相应的MedDRA(®)编码进行比较。
采用回顾性内容分析法,使用葡萄牙南部药物警戒部门区域内医疗保健专业人员提交的自发报告数据库。检索到的数据包括2004年(该部门活动的第一年,n = 53)和2012年(n = 350)发生的所有药物不良反应的习惯用语描述。对医疗保健专业人员所用语言与MedDRA(®)词典编码之间的一致性进行了定量评估。
在这两年共收到的403份自发报告中,收集到了896个描述药物不良反应的词汇。医疗保健专业人员的药物警戒参与程度和药物不良反应习惯用语描述各不相同,药剂师的总体贡献最大。自发报告中所用语言与相应的MedDRA(®)术语之间的一致性因医疗保健专业人员背景而异,当将词典视为药物不良反应语言的金标准时,护士的结果比医生和药剂师的结果更差。
不同医疗保健专业人员群体之间存在词汇准确性和语义差异。这些差异可能会干扰所产生安全信号的强度。应根据医疗保健专业人员的经验和背景,针对性地开展临床和MedDRA(®)术语培训,以不仅提高自发报告的频率,还提高其质量。