• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过呼吸驱动吸入器与压力定量吸入器递送的布地奈德/福莫特罗的治疗等效性。

Therapeutic equivalence of budesonide/formoterol delivered via breath-actuated inhaler vs pMDI.

作者信息

Murphy Kevin R, Dhand Rajiv, Trudo Frank, Uryniak Tom, Aggarwal Ajay, Eckerwall Göran

机构信息

Allergy, Asthma, and Pulmonary Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68132, United States.

Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, 1924 Alcoa Highway, U114, Knoxville, TN 37920, United States.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2015 Feb;109(2):170-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2014.12.009
PMID:25596138
Abstract

RATIONALE

To assess equivalence of twice daily (bid) budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FM) 160/4.5 μg via breath-actuated metered-dose inhaler (BAI) versus pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI).

METHODS

This 12-week, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study, randomized adolescents and adults (aged ≥12 years) with asthma (and ≥3 months daily use of inhaled corticosteroids) to BUD/FM BAI 2 × 160/4.5 μg bid, BUD/FM pMDI 2 × 160/4.5 μg bid, or BUD pMDI 2 × 160 μg bid. Inclusion required prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ≥45 to ≤85% predicted, and reversibility of ≥12% in FEV1 (ages 12 to <18 years) or ≥12% and 200 mL (ages ≥18 years). Confirmation that 60-min postdose FEV1 response to BUD/FM pMDI was superior to BUD pMDI was required before equivalence testing. Therapeutic equivalence was shown by treatment effect ratio of BUD/FM BAI vs BUD/FM pMDI on 60-min postdose FEV1 and predose FEV1 within confidence intervals (CIs) of 80-125%.

RESULTS

Mean age of 214 randomized patients was 42.7 years. BUD/FM pMDI was superior to BUD pMDI (60-min postdose FEV1 treatment effect ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14; p < 0.001). Treatment effect ratios for BUD/FM BAI versus pMDI for 60-min postdose FEV1 (1.01; 95% CI, 0.97-1.05) and predose FEV1 (1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.08) were within predetermined CIs for therapeutic equivalence. Adverse event profiles, tolerability, and patient-reported ease of use were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

BUD/FM 2 × 160/4.5 μg bid BAI is therapeutically equivalent to BUD/FM conventional pMDI. The introduction of BUD/FM BAI would expand options for delivering inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist combination therapy to patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01360021.

摘要

原理

评估通过呼吸驱动定量吸入器(BAI)与压力定量吸入器(pMDI)每日两次(bid)使用布地奈德/福莫特罗(BUD/FM)160/4.5μg的等效性。

方法

这项为期12周的双盲、多中心、平行组研究,将患有哮喘(且每日使用吸入性糖皮质激素≥3个月)的青少年和成年人(年龄≥12岁)随机分为BUD/FM BAI 2×160/4.5μg bid组、BUD/FM pMDI 2×160/4.5μg bid组或BUD pMDI 2×160μg bid组。纳入标准要求支气管扩张剂前一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)≥预计值的45%至≤85%,且FEV1的可逆性在12%以上(12至<18岁)或≥12%且增加200mL(年龄≥18岁)。在进行等效性测试之前,需要确认BUD/FM pMDI给药后60分钟的FEV1反应优于BUD pMDI。通过BUD/FM BAI与BUD/FM pMDI在给药后60分钟FEV1和给药前FEV1的治疗效果比在80%-125%的置信区间(CI)内来显示治疗等效性。

结果

214名随机分组患者的平均年龄为42.7岁。BUD/FM pMDI优于BUD pMDI(给药后60分钟FEV1治疗效果比,1.10;95%CI,1.06-1.14;p<0.001)。BUD/FM BAI与pMDI在给药后60分钟FEV1(1.01;95%CI,0.97-1.05)和给药前FEV1(1.03;95%CI,0.99-1.08)的治疗效果比在预先确定的治疗等效性CI范围内。不良事件谱、耐受性和患者报告的易用性相似。

结论

BUD/FM 2×160/4.5μg bid BAI在治疗上等同于BUD/FM传统pMDI。BUD/FM BAI的引入将为中重度哮喘患者提供吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β2受体激动剂联合治疗的更多选择。ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01360021。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic equivalence of budesonide/formoterol delivered via breath-actuated inhaler vs pMDI.通过呼吸驱动吸入器与压力定量吸入器递送的布地奈德/福莫特罗的治疗等效性。
Respir Med. 2015 Feb;109(2):170-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
2
Efficacy of budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler versus budesonide pressurized metered-dose inhaler alone in Hispanic adults and adolescents with asthma: a randomized, controlled trial.布地奈德/福莫特罗干粉吸入剂对比布地奈德干粉吸入剂治疗西班牙裔成人和青少年哮喘的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Sep;107(3):258-65.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.05.024. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
3
Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler: randomized controlled trial comparing once- and twice-daily dosing in patients with asthma.布地奈德/福莫特罗压力型定量吸入剂的疗效和安全性:比较哮喘患者每日一次和每日两次给药的随机对照试验。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):49-59. doi: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3309.
4
The effect of budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler on predefined criteria for worsening asthma in four different patient populations with asthma.布地奈德/福莫特罗干粉吸入剂对 4 种不同哮喘患者人群中哮喘恶化的预定义标准的影响。
Drugs R D. 2012 Mar 1;12(1):9-14. doi: 10.2165/11630600-000000000-00000.
5
Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurised metered-dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma: a randomised clinical trial.布地奈德福莫特罗单剂量吸入器治疗成人和青少年中重度哮喘的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验
Drugs. 2006;66(17):2235-54. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666170-00006.
6
Twelve-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of the efficacy and tolerability of budesonide and formoterol in one metered-dose inhaler compared with budesonide alone and formoterol alone in adolescents and adults with asthma.一项为期12周的随机、安慰剂对照、多中心研究,旨在比较布地奈德福莫特罗单剂量吸入器与单独使用布地奈德和单独使用福莫特罗在青少年和成人哮喘患者中的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):823-843. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.011.
7
Budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler versus budesonide: a randomized controlled trial in black patients with asthma.布地奈德/福莫特罗压力定量吸入器与布地奈德对比:一项针对黑人哮喘患者的随机对照试验
J Asthma. 2012 Feb;49(1):70-7. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.633788. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with asthma previously stable with twice-daily budesonide/ formoterol dosing.对于之前使用布地奈德/福莫特罗每日两次给药病情稳定的成人和青少年哮喘患者,每日一次布地奈德/福莫特罗压力定量吸入器的疗效和耐受性。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009 Jul;103(1):62-72. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60145-7.
9
A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group study of budesonide inhalation suspension in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids with a metered-dose or dry powder inhaler.一项为期12周的多中心、随机、部分盲法、活性药物对照、平行组研究,旨在评估布地奈德吸入混悬液用于此前使用定量气雾剂或干粉吸入器吸入皮质类固醇治疗的中度至重度持续性哮喘青少年和成人患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):1013-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.005.
10
Bronchodilator effect of single-dose formoterol administered by pressurized metered-dose inhaler in children with asthma aged 6 to <12 years receiving budesonide.在接受布地奈德治疗的6至<12岁哮喘儿童中,使用压力定量吸入器给予单剂量福莫特罗的支气管扩张作用。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):134-40. doi: 10.2500/aap.2014.35.3746.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing the best step-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroids: the EINSTEIN systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis using individual participant data.确定对于尽管使用吸入性糖皮质激素但哮喘仍未得到控制的儿童的最佳升级治疗方案:爱因斯坦系统评价、网状荟萃分析及使用个体参与者数据的成本效益分析
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(15):1-234. doi: 10.3310/HGWT3617.
2
User-Friendliness Evaluation of Handling pMDI with Various Add-on Devices in Asthmatic Patients.患者使用不同附加装置的 pMDI 的易用性评估。
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2024 Nov 27;25(8):274. doi: 10.1208/s12249-024-02998-1.
3
Addition of long-acting beta2 agonists or long-acting muscarinic antagonists versus doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in adolescents and adults with uncontrolled asthma with medium dose ICS: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
在中剂量吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)控制不佳的青少年和成人哮喘患者中,长效β2 激动剂或长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂与加倍 ICS 剂量相比:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 21;8(8):CD013797. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013797.pub2.
4
Inhaled steroids with and without regular formoterol for asthma: serious adverse events.吸入性类固醇联合或不联合常规福莫特罗治疗哮喘:严重不良事件
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 25;9(9):CD006924. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006924.pub4.