Suppr超能文献

基于干燥和粉末状植物材料进行物种鉴定的DNA条形码技术:以心叶黄花稔生药市场样品鉴定为例

DNA barcoding for species identification from dried and powdered plant parts: a case study with authentication of the raw drug market samples of Sida cordifolia.

作者信息

Vassou Sophie Lorraine, Kusuma G, Parani Madasamy

机构信息

Department of Genetic Engineering, Center for DNA Barcoding, School of Bioengineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur 603203, India.

Pharmacy Department, Captain Srinivasa Murti Research Institute for Ayurveda and Siddha Drug Development (CSMRIASDD), Under Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS), Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Anna Hospital Campus, Arumbakkam, Chennai 600106, India.

出版信息

Gene. 2015 Mar 15;559(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.01.025. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

Abstract

The majority of the plant materials used in herbal medicine is procured from the markets in the form of dried or powdered plant parts. It is essential to use authentic plant materials to derive the benefits of herbal medicine. However, establishing the identity of these plant materials by conventional taxonomy is extremely difficult. Here we report a case study in which the species identification of the market samples of Sida cordifolia was done by DNA barcoding. As a prelude to species identification by DNA barcoding, 13 species of Sida were collected, and a reference DNA barcode library was developed using rbcL, matK, psbA-trnH and ITS2 markers. Based on the intra-species and inter-species divergence observed, psbA-trnH and ITS2 were found to be the best two-marker combination for species identification of the market samples. The study showed that none of the market samples belonged to the authentic species, S. cordifolia. Seventy-six per cent of the market samples belonged to other species of Sida. The predominant one was Sida acuta (36%) followed by S. spinosa (20%), S. alnifolia (12%), S. scabrida (4%) and S. ravii (4%). Such substitutions may not only fail to give the expected therapeutic effect, but may also give undesirable effects as in case of S. acuta which contains a 6-fold higher amount of ephedrine compared to the roots of S. cordifolia. The remaining 24% of the samples were from other genera such as Abutilon sp. (8%), Ixonanthes sp., Terminalia sp., Fagonia sp., and Tephrosia sp. (4% each). This observation is in contrast to the belief that medicinal plants are generally substituted or adulterated with closely related species. The current study strongly suggests that the raw drug market samples of herbal medicines need to be properly authenticated before use, and DNA barcoding has been found to be suitable for this purpose.

摘要

草药中使用的大部分植物材料是以干燥或粉末状植物部分的形式从市场采购的。使用正宗的植物材料以获得草药的益处至关重要。然而,通过传统分类学确定这些植物材料的身份极其困难。在此,我们报告一个案例研究,其中通过DNA条形码对市场上的刺蒴麻样品进行了物种鉴定。作为通过DNA条形码进行物种鉴定的前奏,收集了13种刺蒴麻属植物,并使用rbcL、matK、psbA-trnH和ITS2标记构建了一个参考DNA条形码文库。基于观察到的种内和种间差异,发现psbA-trnH和ITS2是用于市场样品物种鉴定的最佳双标记组合。研究表明,没有一个市场样品属于正宗物种刺蒴麻。76%的市场样品属于刺蒴麻属的其他物种。主要的是粗叶刺蒴麻(36%),其次是刺蒴麻(20%)、杨叶刺蒴麻(12%)、糙叶刺蒴麻(4%)和拉维刺蒴麻(4%)。这种替代不仅可能无法产生预期的治疗效果,还可能产生不良影响,如粗叶刺蒴麻,其麻黄碱含量比刺蒴麻根高6倍。其余24%的样品来自其他属,如苘麻属(8%)、粘木属、榄仁属、镰果豆属和灰叶属(各4%)。这一观察结果与药用植物通常被与其亲缘关系密切的物种替代或掺假的观点相反。当前研究强烈表明,草药的生药市场样品在使用前需要进行适当鉴定,并且已发现DNA条形码适用于此目的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验