Ramcharan K S, Lip G Y H, Stonelake P S, Blann A D
Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences City Hospital, University of Birmingham, Dudley Road, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Mar;30(3):315-21. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2116-3. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
The endothelium and angiogenesis are therapeutic targets in cancer. Response to treatment may be assessed by laboratory plasma markers such as circulating endothelial cells (CECs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), von Willebrand factor (vWf), soluble E selectin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiogenin. We hypothesised that these markers, obtained before surgery, would predict 2-year outcome after surgery with or without anti-angiogenic therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC).
We recruited 154 patients with CRC, of whom 51 were treated with surgery alone, 74 were treated with standard chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil) and 29 were treated with standard chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF therapy (Avastin). Peripheral blood was taken before surgery. CD34(+)/CD45(-)/CD146(+) CECs and CD34(+)/CD45(-)/CD309 KDR EPCs were measured by flow cytometry and plasma markers by ELISA.
After a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range 1.9-2.3 years), 52 of the patients (33.7 %) experienced a poor outcome (radiological and/or histological evidence of tumour spread or recurrence, or death [n = 26]). In univariate analysis, poor outcome was linked to Dukes' stage (p < 0.001), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (p < 0.001), type of treatment (surgery alone, standard chemotherapy with or without anti-antigenic therapy) (p = 0.047), CECs (p < 0.02) and EPCs (p < 0.01). In subsequent binary logistic regression analysis, only Dukes' stage (hazard ratio 2.3, 95 % confidence interval 1.0-5.3, p = 0.047) and modified AJCC stage (4.62, 1.88-11.33, p < 0.001) predicted a poor outcome.
Endothelial cell markers (CECs, EPCs, vWf, soluble E selectin) and growth factors (VEGF and angiogenin), measured before surgery, have nothing extra to offer in predicting 2-year outcome in colorectal cancer when compared to Dukes' or AJCC stage.
内皮细胞和血管生成是癌症治疗的靶点。治疗反应可通过实验室血浆标志物进行评估,如循环内皮细胞(CEC)、内皮祖细胞(EPC)、血管性血友病因子(vWf)、可溶性E选择素、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和血管生成素。我们假设,术前获得的这些标志物可预测接受或未接受抗血管生成治疗的结直肠癌(CRC)患者术后2年的预后情况。
我们招募了154例CRC患者,其中51例仅接受手术治疗,74例接受标准化疗(5-氟尿嘧啶),29例接受标准化疗加抗VEGF治疗(阿瓦斯汀)。术前采集外周血。通过流式细胞术检测CD34(+)/CD45(-)/CD146(+) CEC和CD34(+)/CD45(-)/CD309 KDR EPC,并通过ELISA检测血浆标志物。
平均随访2.1年(范围1.9 - 2.3年)后,52例患者(33.7%)预后不良(有肿瘤扩散或复发的影像学和/或组织学证据,或死亡[n = 26])。单因素分析中,预后不良与Dukes分期(p < 0.001)、美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期(p < 0.001)、治疗类型(单纯手术、含或不含抗血管生成治疗的标准化疗)(p = 0.047)、CEC(p < 0.02)和EPC(p < 0.01)相关。在随后的二元逻辑回归分析中,只有Dukes分期(风险比2.3,95%置信区间1.0 - 5.3,p = 0.047)和改良AJCC分期(4.62,1.88 - 11.33,p < 0.001)可预测预后不良。
与Dukes分期或AJCC分期相比,术前检测的内皮细胞标志物(CEC、EPC、vWf、可溶性E选择素)和生长因子(VEGF和血管生成素)在预测结直肠癌2年预后方面并无额外价值。