• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与健康信息技术采用相关的因素:基于系统评价的概念模型。

Factors associated with adoption of health information technology: a conceptual model based on a systematic review.

机构信息

College of Health Professions, School of Health Administration, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2014 May 23;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3106.

DOI:10.2196/medinform.3106
PMID:25599673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4288077/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) allocated $19.2 billion to incentivize adoption of the electronic health record (EHR). Since 2009, Meaningful Use Criteria have dominated information technology (IT) strategy. Health care organizations have struggled to meet expectations and avoid penalties to reimbursements from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Organizational theories attempt to explain factors that influence organizational change, and many theories address changes in organizational strategy. However, due to the complexities of the health care industry, existing organizational theories fall short of demonstrating association with significant health care IT implementations. There is no organizational theory for health care that identifies, groups, and analyzes both internal and external factors of influence for large health care IT implementations like adoption of the EHR.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review is to identify a full-spectrum of both internal organizational and external environmental factors associated with the adoption of health information technology (HIT), specifically the EHR. The result is a conceptual model that is commensurate with the complexity of with the health care sector.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed (restricted to English), EBSCO Host, and Google Scholar for both empirical studies and theory-based writing from 1993-2013 that demonstrated association between influential factors and three modes of HIT: EHR, electronic medical record (EMR), and computerized provider order entry (CPOE). We also looked at published books on organizational theories. We made notes and noted trends on adoption factors. These factors were grouped as adoption factors associated with various versions of EHR adoption.

RESULTS

The resulting conceptual model summarizes the diversity of independent variables (IVs) and dependent variables (DVs) used in articles, editorials, books, as well as quantitative and qualitative studies (n=83). As of 2009, only 16.30% (815/4999) of nonfederal, acute-care hospitals had adopted a fully interoperable EHR. From the 83 articles reviewed in this study, 16/83 (19%) identified internal organizational factors and 9/83 (11%) identified external environmental factors associated with adoption of the EHR, EMR, or CPOE. The conceptual model for EHR adoption associates each variable with the work that identified it.

CONCLUSIONS

Commonalities exist in the literature for internal organizational and external environmental factors associated with the adoption of the EHR and/or CPOE. The conceptual model for EHR adoption associates internal and external factors, specific to the health care industry, associated with adoption of the EHR. It becomes apparent that these factors have some level of association, but the association is not consistently calculated individually or in combination. To better understand effective adoption strategies, empirical studies should be performed from this conceptual model to quantify the positive or negative effect of each factor.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd38/4288077/1df41e7bbf84/medinform_v2i1e9_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd38/4288077/7c95241288e5/medinform_v2i1e9_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd38/4288077/1df41e7bbf84/medinform_v2i1e9_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd38/4288077/7c95241288e5/medinform_v2i1e9_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd38/4288077/1df41e7bbf84/medinform_v2i1e9_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》(HITECH)拨款 192 亿美元激励电子病历(EHR)的采用。自 2009 年以来,有意义的使用标准一直主导着信息技术(IT)战略。医疗机构一直在努力满足期望并避免医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的报销罚款。组织理论试图解释影响组织变革的因素,许多理论都涉及组织战略的变化。然而,由于医疗保健行业的复杂性,现有的组织理论未能证明与重要的医疗保健 IT 实施之间存在关联。没有针对医疗保健的组织理论可以识别、分组和分析与大型医疗保健 IT 实施(如采用 EHR)相关的内部和外部影响因素。

目的

本系统评价的目的是确定与健康信息学(HIT),特别是电子病历(EHR)的采用相关的内部组织和外部环境因素的全谱。结果是一个概念模型,与医疗保健部门的复杂性相匹配。

方法

我们在 PubMed(仅限英语)、EBSCO 主机和 Google Scholar 中进行了系统的文献检索,检索了 1993 年至 2013 年期间的实证研究和基于理论的论文,这些研究表明了有影响力的因素与三种 HIT 模式之间的关联:EHR、电子病历(EMR)和计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)。我们还查看了有关组织理论的出版书籍。我们对采用因素进行了注释和趋势分析。这些因素被分为与各种版本的 EHR 采用相关的采用因素。

结果

由此产生的概念模型总结了在文章、社论、书籍以及定量和定性研究中使用的独立变量(IV)和因变量(DV)的多样性(n=83)。截至 2009 年,只有 16.30%(815/4999)的非联邦急症医院采用了完全互操作的 EHR。在这项研究中审查的 83 篇文章中,有 16/83(19%)确定了与采用 EHR、EMR 或 CPOE 相关的内部组织因素,有 9/83(11%)确定了与采用 EHR 相关的外部环境因素。EHR 采用的概念模型将每个变量与确定它的工作联系起来。

结论

文献中存在与采用 EHR 和/或 CPOE 相关的内部组织和外部环境因素的共同点。EHR 采用的概念模型将与医疗保健行业相关的内部和外部因素与 EHR 的采用联系起来。显然,这些因素存在某种程度的关联,但关联并没有单独或组合进行一致计算。为了更好地理解有效的采用策略,应从这个概念模型中进行实证研究,以量化每个因素的积极或消极影响。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with adoption of health information technology: a conceptual model based on a systematic review.与健康信息技术采用相关的因素:基于系统评价的概念模型。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 May 23;2(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3106.
2
Adoption Factors of the Electronic Health Record: A Systematic Review.电子健康记录的采用因素:系统评价。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Jun 1;4(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5525.
3
Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.门诊电子健康记录系统实施的循证管理:概念支持与定性证据评估
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):484-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
4
Adoption factors associated with electronic health record among long-term care facilities: a systematic review.长期护理机构中与电子健康记录相关的采用因素:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 28;5(1):e006615. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006615.
5
Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify.安全使用电子健康记录和健康信息技术系统:信任但要验证。
J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec;9(4):177-89. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182a8c2b2.
6
How are Electronic Health Records Associated with Provider Productivity and Billing in Orthopaedic Surgery?电子健康记录如何与矫形外科医生的生产力和计费相关联?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2443-2451. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000896.
7
Impact of the HITECH financial incentives on EHR adoption in small, physician-owned practices.《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》(HITECH)财政激励措施对小型医生所有诊所采用电子健康记录(EHR)的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.017. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
8
Costs and benefits of health information technology.健康信息技术的成本与效益
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Apr(132):1-71. doi: 10.23970/ahrqepcerta132.
9
Payer mix and EHR adoption in hospitals.医疗机构的支付方构成和电子健康档案采纳情况。
J Healthc Manag. 2012 Nov-Dec;57(6):435-48; discussion 449-50.
10
Adoption of Electronic Health Record Among Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.采用电子健康记录在物质使用障碍治疗计划中:全国横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 14;25:e45238. doi: 10.2196/45238.

引用本文的文献

1
25 Years of Electronic Health Record Implementation Processes: Scoping Review.电子健康记录实施流程25年:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e60077. doi: 10.2196/60077.
2
Patterns of health information exchange strategies underlying health information technologies capabilities building.健康信息技术能力建设背后的健康信息交换策略模式。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2021 Jul 16;11(3):211-231. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2021.1952113. eCollection 2022.
3
Evaluation of a Health Information Exchange System for Geriatric Health Care in Rural Areas: Development and Technical Acceptance Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with adoption of the electronic health record system among primary care physicians.与初级保健医生采用电子健康记录系统相关的因素。
JMIR Med Inform. 2013 Aug 26;1(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/medinform.2766.
2
Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems.非基层医疗机构和小型诊所的医生以及 55 岁及以上的医生在采用电子健康记录系统方面较为滞后。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):1108-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1121. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
3
Hospitals ineligible for federal meaningful-use incentives have dismally low rates of adoption of electronic health records.
农村老年保健健康信息交换系统的评估:开发与技术接受度研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 15;9(3):e34568. doi: 10.2196/34568.
4
Classification of Electronic Health Record-Related Patient Safety Incidents: Development and Validation Study.电子健康记录相关患者安全事件的分类:开发与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Aug 31;9(8):e30470. doi: 10.2196/30470.
5
Association of Electronic Health Record Vendors With Hospital Financial and Quality Performance: Retrospective Data Analysis.电子健康记录供应商与医院财务及质量绩效的关联:回顾性数据分析
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 14;23(4):e23961. doi: 10.2196/23961.
6
The Effect of Innovation Capabilities of Health Care Organizations on the Quality of Health Information Technology: Model Development With Cross-sectional Data.医疗机构创新能力对健康信息技术质量的影响:基于横截面数据的模型开发
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 15;9(3):e23306. doi: 10.2196/23306.
7
Health information technology and hospital performance the role of health information quality in teaching hospitals.健康信息技术与医院绩效:健康信息质量在教学医院中的作用
Heliyon. 2020 Oct 10;6(10):e05040. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05040. eCollection 2020 Oct.
8
Successfully implementing a national electronic health record: a rapid umbrella review.成功实施国家电子健康记录系统:快速伞式综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Dec;144:104281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104281. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
9
Association of Electronic Health Record Use Above Meaningful Use Thresholds With Hospital Quality and Safety Outcomes.超过有意义使用阈值的电子健康记录使用与医院质量和安全结果的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2012529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12529.
10
The Perceptions of and Factors Associated With the Adoption of the Electronic Health Record Sharing System Among Patients and Physicians: Cross-Sectional Survey.患者和医生对电子健康记录共享系统的认知及采用相关因素:横断面调查
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 May 21;8(5):e17452. doi: 10.2196/17452.
不符合联邦有意义使用激励条件的医院电子病历采用率极低。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):505-13. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0351.
4
Outcomes of computerized physician order entry in an electronic health record after implementation in an outpatient oncology setting.电子病历中计算机化医嘱录入系统在门诊肿瘤环境中的实施效果。
J Oncol Pract. 2011 Jul;7(4):233-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000261.
5
Healthcare professionals' organisational barriers to health information technologies-a literature review.医疗保健专业人员在健康信息技术方面的组织障碍:文献综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Dec;80(12):849-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
6
Hospital financial position and the adoption of electronic health records.医院财务状况与电子健康记录的采用。
J Healthc Manag. 2011 Sep-Oct;56(5):337-50; discussion 351-2.
7
Electronic health record functions differ between best and worst hospitals.电子健康记录的功能在最好的和最差的医院之间有所不同。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):e121-47.
8
Exploring the business case for ambulatory electronic health record system adoption.探讨采用可移动电子健康记录系统的商业案例。
J Healthc Manag. 2011 May-Jun;56(3):169-80; discussion 181-2.
9
Alternative measures of electronic health record adoption among hospitals.医院电子健康记录采用的替代措施。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Dec;16(12 Suppl HIT):e293-301.
10
A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review.基于知识的医师采用电子健康记录系统的关键因素分类法:系统文献回顾。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Oct 15;10:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-60.