Ojinnaka Chinedum O, Choi Yong, Kum Hye-Chung, Bolin Jane N
Department of Health Policy and Management, Texas A&M Health Science Center School of Public Health, College Station, Texas.
J Rural Health. 2015 Summer;31(3):254-68. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12104. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
The purpose of this study was to explore the associations between sociodemographic factors such as residence, health care access, and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among residents of Texas.
Using the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, we performed logistic regression analyses to determine predictors of CRC screening among Texas residents, including rural versus urban differences. Our outcomes of interest were previous (1) CRC screening using any CRC test, (2) fecal occult blood test (FOBT), or (3) endoscopy, as well as up-to-date screening using (4) any CRC test, (5) FOBT, or (6) endoscopy. The independent variable of interest was rural versus urban residence; we controlled for other sociodemographic and health care access variables such as lack of health insurance.
Multivariate analysis showed that individuals who were residents of a rural/non-Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) location (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.51-0.97) or a suburban county (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.39-0.95) were less likely to report ever having any CRC screening compared to residents of a center city of an MSA. Residents of a rural/non-MSA location were less likely (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.28-0.87) than residents of a center city of an MSA to be up-to-date using FOBT. There was decreased likelihood of ever being screened for CRC among the uninsured (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.31-0.59).
Effective development and implementation of strategies to improve screening rates should aim at improving access to health care, taking into account demographic characteristics such as rural versus urban residence.
本研究旨在探讨德克萨斯州居民的社会人口统计学因素(如居住地、医疗保健可及性)与结直肠癌(CRC)筛查之间的关联。
利用2012年行为危险因素监测调查,我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以确定德克萨斯州居民中CRC筛查的预测因素,包括城乡差异。我们感兴趣的结果是既往(1)使用任何CRC检测进行的CRC筛查、(2)粪便潜血试验(FOBT)或(3)内镜检查,以及使用(4)任何CRC检测、(5)FOBT或(6)内镜检查的最新筛查情况。感兴趣的自变量是城乡居住地;我们控制了其他社会人口统计学和医疗保健可及性变量,如缺乏医疗保险。
多变量分析显示,与大都市统计区(MSA)中心城市的居民相比,居住在农村/非大都市统计区(MSA)地区(OR = 0.70,95% CI = 0.51 - 0.97)或郊区县(OR = 0.61,95% CI = 0.39 - 0.95)的个体报告曾进行过任何CRC筛查的可能性较小。农村/非MSA地区的居民使用FOBT进行最新筛查的可能性(OR = 0.49,95% CI = 0.28 - 0.87)低于MSA中心城市的居民。未参保者接受CRC筛查的可能性降低(OR = 0.43,95% CI = 0.31 - 0.59)。
有效制定和实施提高筛查率的策略应旨在改善医疗保健可及性,同时考虑城乡居住地等人口特征。