Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Policlinico Umberto I, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 37, 00161 Rome, Italy.
University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Mar;45(3):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.12.008. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
The aim of this multicentre study was to analyse the characteristics of patients with bloodstream infections due to staphylococcal strains resistant to linezolid. This was a retrospective case-case-control study of patients hospitalised in three large teaching hospitals in Italy. A linezolid-resistant (LIN-R) Staphylococcus spp. group and a linezolid-susceptible (LIN-S) Staphylococcus spp. group were compared with control patients to determine the clinical features and factors associated with isolation of LIN-R strains. All LIN-R Staphylococcus spp. strains underwent molecular typing. Compared with the LIN-S group, central venous catheters were the main source of infection in the LIN-R group. The LIN-R and LIN-S groups showed a similar incidence of severe sepsis or septic shock, and both showed a higher incidence of these compared with the control group. Overall, patients in the LIN-R group had a higher 30-day mortality rate. Multivariate analysis found previous linezolid therapy, linezolid therapy >14 days, antibiotic therapy in the previous 30 days, antibiotic therapy >14 days, previous use of at least two antibiotics and hospitalisation in the previous 90 days as independent risk factors associated with isolation of a LIN-R strain. The G2576T mutation in domain V of 23S rRNA was the principal mechanism of resistance; only one strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis carried the cfr methylase gene (A2503), together with L4 insertion (71GGR72) and L3 substitution (H146Q). LIN-R strains are associated with severe impairment of clinical conditions and unfavourable patient outcomes. Reinforcement of infection control measures may have an important role in preventing these infections.
本多中心研究旨在分析耐利奈唑酮葡萄球菌血流感染患者的特征。这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,纳入了意大利三家大型教学医院的住院患者。比较了耐利奈唑酮(LIN-R)葡萄球菌组和利奈唑酮敏感(LIN-S)葡萄球菌组与对照患者,以确定与 LIN-R 株分离相关的临床特征和因素。所有 LIN-R 葡萄球菌株均进行了分子分型。与 LIN-S 组相比,中心静脉导管是 LIN-R 组感染的主要来源。LIN-R 和 LIN-S 组严重脓毒症或感染性休克的发生率相似,且均高于对照组。总体而言,LIN-R 组患者 30 天死亡率较高。多变量分析发现,先前的利奈唑酮治疗、利奈唑酮治疗>14 天、治疗前 30 天使用抗生素、抗生素治疗>14 天、先前使用至少两种抗生素和入院前 90 天是与 LIN-R 株分离相关的独立危险因素。23S rRNA 结构域 V 中的 G2576T 突变是主要的耐药机制;仅表皮葡萄球菌的一株菌株携带 cfr 甲基化酶基因(A2503),同时存在 L4 插入(71GGR72)和 L3 取代(H146Q)。LIN-R 菌株与严重的临床状况损害和不良的患者结局相关。强化感染控制措施可能在预防这些感染方面发挥重要作用。