Ipser Jonathan C, Wilson Don, Akindipe Taiwo O, Sager Carli, Stein Dan J
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, J-Block, Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa, 7925.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 20;1(1):CD007505. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007505.pub2.
Anxiety disorders are a potentially disabling group of disorders that frequently co-occur with alcohol use disorders. Comorbid anxiety and alcohol use disorders are associated with poorer outcomes, and are difficult to treat with standard psychosocial interventions. In addition, improved understanding of the biological basis of the conditions has contributed to a growing interest in the use of medications for the treatment of people with both diagnoses.
To assess the effects of pharmacotherapy for treating anxiety in people with comorbid alcohol use disorders, specifically: to provide an estimate of the overall effects of medication in improving treatment response and reducing symptom severity in the treatment of anxiety disorders in people with comorbid alcohol use disorders; to determine whether specific medications are more effective and tolerable than other medications in the treatment of particular anxiety disorders; and to identify which factors (clinical, methodological) predict response to pharmacotherapy for anxiety disorders.
Review authors searched the specialized registers of The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group (CCDANCTR, to January 2014) and the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group (CDAG, to March 2013) for eligible trials. These registers contain reports of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) from: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, all years), MEDLINE (1950 to date), EMBASE (1974 to date) and PsycINFO (1967 to date). Review authors ran complementary searches on EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO and the Alcohol and Alcohol Problems Science Database (ETOH) (to August 2013). We located unpublished trials through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) RePORTER service and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (to August 2013). We screened reference lists of retrieved articles for additional studies.
All true RCTs of pharmacotherapy for treating anxiety disorders with comorbid alcohol use disorders. Trials assessing drugs administered for the treatment of drinking behaviour, such as naltrexone, disulfiram and acomprosate were not eligible for inclusion in this systematic review.
A systematic review is a standardised evaluation of all research studies that address a particular clinical issue.Two review authors independently assessed RCTs for inclusion in the review, collated trial data and assessed trial quality. We contacted investigators to obtain missing data. We calculated categorical and continuous treatment effect estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for treatment using a random-effects model with effect-size variability expressed using Chi(2) and I(2) heterogeneity statistics.
We included five placebo-controlled pharmacotherapy RCTs (with 290 participants) in the review. Most of the trials provided little information on how randomization was performed or on whether both participants and study personnel were blinded to the intervention. Two of the three trials reporting superiority of medication compared with placebo on anxiety symptom outcomes were industry funded. We regarded one trial as being at high risk of bias due to selective reporting.Study participants had Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) III- and DSM IV-diagnosed alcohol use disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder (two studies), social anxiety disorder (SAD; two studies) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; one study). Four trials assessed the efficacy of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs: sertraline, paroxetine); one RCT investigated the efficacy of buspirone, a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) partial agonist. Treatment duration lasted between eight and 24 weeks. Overall, 70% of participants included in the review were male.There was very low quality evidence for an effect of paroxetine on global clinical response to treatment, as assessed by the Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement scale (CGI-I). Global clinical response was observed in more than twice as many participants with paroxetine than with placebo (57.7% with paroxetine versus 25.8% with placebo; risk ratio (RR) 2.23, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.41; 2 trials, 57 participants). However, there was substantial uncertainty regarding the size of the effect of paroxetine due to the small number of studies providing data on clinically diverse patient samples. The second primary outcome measure was reduction of anxiety symptom severity. Although study investigators reported that buspirone (one trial) was superior to placebo in reducing the severity of anxiety symptoms over 12 weeks, no evidence of efficacy was observed for paroxetine (mean difference (MD) -14.70, 95% CI -33.00 to 3.60, 2 trials, 44 participants) and sertraline (one trial). Paroxetine appeared to be equally effective in reducing the severity of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms as the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine in one RCT. The maximal reduction in anxiety disorder symptom severity was achieved after six weeks with paroxetine (two RCTs) and 12 weeks with buspirone (one RCT), with maintenance of medication efficacy extending to 16 with paroxetine and 24 weeks with buspirone. There was no evidence of an effect for any of the medications tested on abstinence from alcohol use or depression symptoms. There was very low quality evidence that paroxetine was well tolerated, based on drop-out due to treatment-emergent adverse effects. Nevertheless, levels of treatment discontinuation were high, with 43.1% of the participants in the studies withdrawing from medication treatment. Certain adverse effects, such as sexual problems, were commonly reported after treatment with paroxetine and sertraline.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence-base for the effectiveness of medication in treating anxiety disorders and comorbid alcohol use disorders is currently inconclusive. There was a small amount of evidence for the efficacy of medication, but this was limited and of very low quality. The majority of the data for the efficacy and tolerability of medication were for SSRIs; there were insufficient data to establish differences in treatment efficacy between medication classes or patient subgroups. There was a small amount of very low quality evidence that medication was well tolerated. There was no evidence that alcohol use was responsive to medication.Large, rigorously conducted RCTs would help supplement the small evidence-base for the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacotherapy for anxiety and comorbid alcohol use disorders. Further research on patient subgroups who may benefit from pharmacological treatment, as well as novel pharmacological interventions, is warranted.
焦虑症是一组潜在致残性疾病,常与酒精使用障碍同时出现。焦虑症与酒精使用障碍共病会导致更差的预后,且难以通过标准的心理社会干预进行治疗。此外,对这些疾病生物学基础的深入了解促使人们越来越关注使用药物治疗同时患有这两种疾病的患者。
评估药物治疗对共病酒精使用障碍患者焦虑症的疗效,具体如下:估计药物治疗对改善共病酒精使用障碍患者焦虑症治疗反应及减轻症状严重程度的总体效果;确定在治疗特定焦虑症时,特定药物是否比其他药物更有效且耐受性更好;识别哪些因素(临床、方法学)可预测焦虑症药物治疗的反应。
综述作者检索了Cochrane协作网抑郁、焦虑与神经症综述组(CCDANCTR,截至2014年1月)和Cochrane药物与酒精组(CDAG,截至2013年3月)的专业注册库,以查找符合条件的试验。这些注册库包含来自以下数据库的相关随机对照试验(RCT)报告:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,所有年份)、MEDLINE(1950年至今)、EMBASE(1974年至今)和PsycINFO(1967年至今)。综述作者在EMBASE、PubMed、PsycINFO和酒精与酒精问题科学数据库(ETOH)(截至2013年8月)上进行了补充检索。我们通过美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)报告服务和世界卫生组织(WHO)国际临床试验注册平台(截至2013年8月)查找未发表的试验。我们筛选检索文章的参考文献列表以获取其他研究。
所有治疗共病酒精使用障碍患者焦虑症的药物治疗的真实RCT。评估用于治疗饮酒行为的药物(如纳曲酮、双硫仑和阿坎酸)的试验不符合纳入本系统综述的条件。
系统综述是对所有针对特定临床问题的研究进行的标准化评估。两位综述作者独立评估RCT是否纳入综述、整理试验数据并评估试验质量。我们联系研究者以获取缺失数据。我们使用随机效应模型计算分类和连续治疗效应估计值及其95%置信区间(CI),效应大小的变异性用Chi(2)和I(2)异质性统计量表示。
我们在综述中纳入了五项安慰剂对照的药物治疗RCT(共290名参与者)。大多数试验几乎没有提供关于随机化如何进行或参与者和研究人员是否对干预措施不知情的信息。在报告药物在焦虑症状结局方面优于安慰剂的三项试验中,有两项由行业资助。由于选择性报告,我们将一项试验视为存在高偏倚风险。研究参与者患有《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)III和DSM IV诊断的酒精使用障碍以及创伤后应激障碍(两项研究)、社交焦虑障碍(SAD;两项研究)或广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD;一项研究)。四项试验评估了选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs:舍曲林、帕罗西汀)的疗效;一项RCT研究了5-羟色胺(5-HT)部分激动剂丁螺环酮的疗效。治疗持续时间为8至24周。总体而言,纳入综述的参与者中有70%为男性。根据临床总体印象-改善量表(CGI-I)评估,帕罗西汀对总体临床治疗反应有影响的证据质量极低。使用帕罗西汀的参与者中观察到总体临床反应的人数是使用安慰剂者的两倍多(帕罗西汀组为57.7%,安慰剂组为25.8%;风险比(RR)2.23,95%CI 1.13至4.41;2项试验,57名参与者)。然而,由于提供不同临床患者样本数据的研究数量较少,帕罗西汀的效应大小存在很大不确定性。第二个主要结局指标是焦虑症状严重程度的降低。尽管研究调查人员报告丁螺环酮(一项试验)在12周内减轻焦虑症状严重程度方面优于安慰剂,但未观察到帕罗西汀(平均差(MD)-14.70,95%CI -33.00至3.60,2项试验,44名参与者)和舍曲林(一项试验)的疗效证据。在一项RCT中,帕罗西汀在减轻创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状严重程度方面似乎与三环类抗抑郁药地昔帕明同样有效。帕罗西汀(两项RCT)在6周后和丁螺环酮(一项RCT)在12周后实现了焦虑症症状严重程度的最大降低,帕罗西汀的药物疗效维持至16周,丁螺环酮维持至24周。没有证据表明所测试的任何药物对戒酒或抑郁症状有影响。基于因治疗出现的不良反应而退出的情况,有质量极低的证据表明帕罗西汀耐受性良好。然而,治疗中断水平很高,研究中有43.1%的参与者退出药物治疗。某些不良反应,如性功能问题,在使用帕罗西汀和舍曲林治疗后经常被报告。
药物治疗共病酒精使用障碍患者焦虑症有效性的证据基础目前尚无定论。有少量药物疗效的证据,但有限且质量极低。药物疗效和耐受性的大多数数据是关于SSRIs的;没有足够数据确定不同药物类别或患者亚组之间的治疗效果差异。有少量质量极低的证据表明药物耐受性良好。没有证据表明酒精使用对药物有反应。大规模、严格进行的RCT将有助于补充关于焦虑症和共病酒精使用障碍药物治疗疗效和耐受性的少量证据基础。有必要对可能从药物治疗中获益的患者亚组以及新型药物干预措施进行进一步研究。