Suppr超能文献

监督快速评估量表得分与儿童意外伤害的关联

The association of the rapid assessment of supervision scale score and unintentional childhood injury.

作者信息

Anderst James, Teran Paul, Dowd M Denise, Simon Steve, Schnitzer Patricia

机构信息

Division of Child Abuse and Neglect, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA

The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.

出版信息

Child Maltreat. 2015 May;20(2):141-5. doi: 10.1177/1077559514566450. Epub 2015 Jan 18.

Abstract

Supervisory neglect is often considered in medical settings when a child presents with an unintentional injury. The Rapid Assessment of Supervision Scale (RASS) is a clinical decision-making tool for the assessment of supervision of young children. As the next step in the development of the RASS, we assessed the association of RASS scores with unintentional injury. This study was a secondary analysis of data from a case-crossover study, which examined the association of parental supervision and unintentional injury in children. Data on supervision characteristics for 3 time periods for each child were available, that is, one injury scenario and two "control" time periods when no injury occurred. Blinded to injury status, four raters independently evaluated adequacy of supervision in 132 supervision scenarios using the RASS. The individual RASS scores of the four raters and the group (mean) RASS score of the four raters were evaluated for associations with injury status. Individual scores from three of the four raters demonstrated significant associations of increasing RASS scores with injury. Increasing group RASS scores (odds ratio = 2.8; 95% confidence interval [1.5, 5.1]) were associated with greater likelihood of injury. Further testing may result in a tool that aids medical personnel in the evaluation of adequacy of supervision.

摘要

当儿童出现意外伤害时,医疗环境中常常会考虑监管疏忽的问题。快速评估监管量表(RASS)是一种用于评估幼儿监管情况的临床决策工具。作为RASS开发的下一步,我们评估了RASS分数与意外伤害之间的关联。本研究是一项对病例交叉研究数据的二次分析,该病例交叉研究考察了父母监管与儿童意外伤害之间的关联。每个儿童有三个时间段的监管特征数据,即一次受伤情况以及两次未发生伤害的“对照”时间段。在不知晓伤害状态的情况下,四名评估者使用RASS对132个监管场景中的监管充分性进行了独立评估。评估了四名评估者的个人RASS分数以及四名评估者的组(平均)RASS分数与伤害状态之间的关联。四名评估者中有三名的个人分数显示,RASS分数升高与伤害存在显著关联。组RASS分数升高(比值比=2.8;95%置信区间[1.5, 5.1])与伤害可能性增大相关。进一步的测试可能会产生一种有助于医务人员评估监管充分性的工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验