Suppr超能文献

当代大量Fontan人群的综合心律评估。

Comprehensive rhythm evaluation in a large contemporary Fontan population.

作者信息

Bossers Sjoerd S M, Duppen Nienke, Kapusta Livia, Maan Arie C, Duim Anouk R, Bogers Ad J J C, Hazekamp Mark G, van Iperen Gabrielle, Helbing Willem A, Blom Nico A

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Paediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre - Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands Department of Paediatrics, Paediatric Cardiology Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Dec;48(6):833-40; discussion 840-1. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu548. Epub 2015 Jan 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Rhythm disturbances are an important cause of morbidity in Fontan patients. Currently, the total cavopulmonary connection is performed by using the intra-atrial lateral tunnel (ILT) ('baffle ILT' or 'prosthetic ILT'), or the extracardiac conduit (ECC). The aim of the study was to evaluate rhythm abnormalities and compare the surgical techniques in a contemporary cohort.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional multicentre study, 115 patients (age 12.5 ± 3.1 years) underwent rhythm evaluation using ECG, exercise testing and Holter, including heart rate variability. Medical history was reviewed for episodes of arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Sinus node dysfunction (SND) was found in 29%, 3 of whom required pacemaker therapy. No difference was found in the incidence of SND between ILT and ECC patients. Sinus pauses occurred only in the ILT group. Exercise testing showed no difference in peak heart rate between the groups. Heart rate reserve (P = 0.023) and heart rate recovery (HRrecovery) (P < 0.001) were lower in ILT patients. Atrial arrhythmias were more common in ILT patients (15 vs 1%, P = 0.004), but only in those with a baffle ILT. One patient had symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Holter recordings showed sub-clinical VT in 6% of patients, which was associated with larger end-diastolic (P = 0.035) and end-systolic volumes (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of arrhythmia was low, although SND was frequently present in both Fontan groups. ILT patients had slower HRrecovery, and ILT patients with the more extensive baffle technique had more atrial arrhythmias and more sinus pauses. The significance of asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in this young population remains to be determined.

摘要

目的

心律失常是Fontan手术患者发病的重要原因。目前,全腔静脉肺动脉连接术采用心房内侧面隧道(ILT)(“挡板ILT”或“人工ILT”)或心外管道(ECC)进行。本研究的目的是评估心律异常,并比较当代队列中的手术技术。

方法

在一项横断面多中心研究中,115例患者(年龄12.5±3.1岁)接受了心电图、运动试验和动态心电图检查,包括心率变异性评估。回顾病史以了解心律失常发作情况。

结果

29%的患者发现窦房结功能障碍(SND),其中3例需要起搏器治疗。ILT组和ECC组患者的SND发生率无差异。窦性停搏仅发生在ILT组。运动试验显示两组间的峰值心率无差异。ILT组患者的心率储备(P = 0.023)和心率恢复(HRrecovery)(P < 0.001)较低。ILT组患者房性心律失常更常见(15%对1%,P = 0.004),但仅见于采用挡板ILT的患者。1例患者出现有症状的室性心动过速(VT)。动态心电图记录显示6%的患者有亚临床VT,这与更大的舒张末期容积(P = 0.035)和收缩末期容积(P = 0.029)相关。

结论

尽管Fontan两组患者中SND均较为常见,但心律失常的总体发生率较低。ILT组患者的HRrecovery较慢,采用更广泛挡板技术的ILT组患者房性心律失常和窦性停搏更多。无症状室性心律失常在这一年轻人群中的意义仍有待确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验