Deng Wei Sophia, Sloutsky Vladimir M
Department of Psychology.
Dev Psychol. 2015 Mar;51(3):392-405. doi: 10.1037/a0038749. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
Does category representation change in the course of development? And if so, how and why? The current study attempted to answer these questions by examining category learning and category representation. In Experiment 1, 4-year-olds, 6-year-olds, and adults were trained with either a classification task or an inference task and their categorization performance and memory for items were tested. Adults and 6-year-olds exhibited an important asymmetry: they relied on a single deterministic feature during classification training, but not during inference training. In contrast, regardless of the training condition, 4-year-olds relied on multiple probabilistic features. In Experiment 2, 4-year-olds were presented with classification training and their attention was explicitly directed to the deterministic feature. Under this condition, their categorization performance was similar to that of older participants in Experiment 1, yet their memory performance pointed to a similarity-based representation, which was similar to that of 4-year-olds in Experiment 1. These results are discussed in relation to theories of categorization and the role of selective attention in the development of category learning.
类别表征在发展过程中会发生变化吗?如果是这样,如何以及为何会发生变化?当前的研究试图通过考察类别学习和类别表征来回答这些问题。在实验1中,对4岁儿童、6岁儿童和成年人进行了分类任务或推理任务的训练,并测试了他们的分类表现和对项目的记忆。成年人和6岁儿童表现出一个重要的不对称性:他们在分类训练中依赖单一的确定性特征,但在推理训练中并非如此。相比之下,无论训练条件如何,4岁儿童都依赖多个概率性特征。在实验2中,对4岁儿童进行了分类训练,并明确引导他们将注意力指向确定性特征。在这种情况下,他们的分类表现与实验1中年龄较大的参与者相似,但其记忆表现表明是基于相似性的表征,这与实验1中4岁儿童的情况相似。将结合分类理论以及选择性注意在类别学习发展中的作用对这些结果进行讨论。