Castro Leyre, Savic Olivera, Navarro Victor, Sloutsky Vladimir M, Wasserman Edward A
The University of Iowa, United States of America.
Ohio State University, United States of America.
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104350. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104350. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
Attention to relevant stimulus features in a categorization task helps to optimize performance. However, the relationship between attention and categorization is not fully understood. For example, even when human adults and young children exhibit comparable categorization behavior, adults tend to attend selectively during learning, whereas young children tend to attend diffusely (Deng & Sloutsky, 2016). Here, we used a comparative approach to investigate the link between attention and categorization in two different species. Given the noteworthy categorization ability of avian species, we compared the attentional profiles of pigeons and human adults. We gave human adults (Experiment 1) and pigeons (Experiment 2) a categorization task that could be learned on the basis of either one deterministic feature (encouraging selective attention) or multiple probabilistic features (encouraging distributed attention). Both humans and pigeons relied on the deterministic feature to categorize the stimuli, albeit humans did so to a much greater degree. Furthermore, computational modeling revealed that most of the adults exhibited maximal selectivity, whereas pigeons tended to distribute their attention among several features. Our findings indicate that human adults focus their attention on deterministic information and filter less predictive information, but pigeons do not. Implications for the underlying brain mechanisms of attention and categorization are discussed.
在分类任务中关注相关刺激特征有助于优化表现。然而,注意力与分类之间的关系尚未完全明晰。例如,即使成年人类和幼儿表现出可比的分类行为,但成年人在学习过程中倾向于选择性地关注,而幼儿则倾向于分散地关注(邓 & 斯洛茨基,2016)。在此,我们采用比较方法来研究两种不同物种中注意力与分类之间的联系。鉴于鸟类显著的分类能力,我们比较了鸽子和成年人类的注意力特征。我们给成年人类(实验1)和鸽子(实验2)一项分类任务,该任务可以基于单一确定性特征(鼓励选择性注意)或多个概率性特征(鼓励分散性注意)来学习。人类和鸽子都依赖确定性特征对刺激进行分类,尽管人类的程度要大得多。此外,计算建模显示,大多数成年人表现出最大程度的选择性,而鸽子倾向于将注意力分散在多个特征上。我们的研究结果表明,成年人类将注意力集中在确定性信息上并过滤掉预测性较低的信息,但鸽子并非如此。文中还讨论了对注意力和分类潜在脑机制的启示。