Higaki Nobuhiro, Yorozuya Toshihiro, Nagaro Takumi, Tsubota Shinzo, Fujii Tomomi, Fukunaga Tomoe, Moriyama Mitsuhide, Yoshikawa Takeki
*Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan; ‡Department of Palliative Care Medicine, Matsuyama Bethel Hospital, Ehime, Japan; §Department of Anesthesiology, Uwajima City Hospital, Ehime, Japan; ¶Department of Palliative Care Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Hyogo, Japan; ‖Pain Clinic Unit, Nakatani Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Neurosurgery. 2015 Mar;76(3):249-56; discussion 256; quiz 256-7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000593.
Although mirror pain occurs after cordotomy in patients experiencing unilateral pain via a referred pain mechanism, no studies have examined whether this pain mechanism operates in patients who have bilateral pain.
To assess the usefulness of cordotomy for bilateral pain from the viewpoint of increased pain or new pain caused by a referred pain mechanism.
Twenty-six patients who underwent percutaneous cordotomy through C1-C2 for severe bilateral cancer pain in the lumbosacral nerve region were enrolled. Pain was dominant on 1 side in 23 patients, and pain was equally severe on both sides in 3 patients. Unilateral cordotomy was performed for the dominant side of pain, and bilateral cordotomy was performed for 13 patients in whom pain on the nondominant side developed or remained severe after cordotomy.
After unilateral cordotomy, 19 patients (73.1%) exhibited increased pain, which for 14 patients was as severe as the original dominant pain. After bilateral cordotomy, 7 patients (53.4%) exhibited new pain, which was located cephalad to the region rendered analgesic by cordotomy and was better controlled than the original pain. No pathological organic causes of new pain were found in any patient, and evidence of a referred pain mechanism was found in 3 patients after bilateral cordotomy.
These results show that a referred pain mechanism causes increased or new pain after cordotomy in patients with bilateral pain. Nevertheless, cordotomy can still be indicated for patients with bilateral pain because postoperative pain is better controlled than the original pain.
尽管在通过牵涉痛机制出现单侧疼痛的患者中,脊髓切开术后会发生镜像痛,但尚无研究探讨这种疼痛机制在双侧疼痛患者中是否起作用。
从牵涉痛机制导致疼痛加剧或出现新疼痛的角度评估脊髓切开术对双侧疼痛的有效性。
纳入26例因腰骶神经区域严重双侧癌痛而接受经皮C1 - C2脊髓切开术的患者。23例患者疼痛以一侧为主,3例患者双侧疼痛程度相同。对疼痛为主的一侧进行单侧脊髓切开术,对13例在脊髓切开术后非主要侧疼痛仍持续或加重的患者进行双侧脊髓切开术。
单侧脊髓切开术后,19例患者(73.1%)疼痛加剧,其中14例患者的疼痛程度与原来的主要疼痛一样严重。双侧脊髓切开术后,7例患者(53.4%)出现新疼痛,新疼痛位于脊髓切开术所致镇痛区域的上方,且比原来的疼痛更容易控制。所有患者均未发现新疼痛的病理性器质性原因,双侧脊髓切开术后3例患者发现有牵涉痛机制的证据。
这些结果表明,牵涉痛机制在双侧疼痛患者脊髓切开术后会导致疼痛加剧或出现新疼痛。然而,双侧疼痛患者仍可考虑行脊髓切开术,因为术后疼痛比原来的疼痛更容易控制。