Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜非改位经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌的可行性及近期疗效

[Feasibility and short-outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision without changing position for distal rectal cancer].

作者信息

Xiao Yi, Xu Lai, Qiu Huizhong, Wu Bin, Lin Guole, Sun Xiyu, Zhang Guannan

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China. Email:

Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Nov;52(11):826-30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) without changing position during operation.

METHODS

Totally 51 patients with distal advanced rectal cancer received surgical operation in Peking Union Midical College Hospital from September 2011 to April 2014. There were 29 male and 22 female patients with a mean age of (61 ± 10) years. Twenty-six percent of the patients received preoperative concomitant chemotherapy and radiation. Twenty-seven patients underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision (APE) procedure, while 24 patients underwent ELAPE procedure. In both groups, patients were kept Lithotomy-Trendelenburg position during operation. The fat tissue in ischialrectal fossa was not routinely removed, except the tumor invasion. All the patients' pelvic peritoneum was closed by continuous suturing, and subcutaneous tissue and skin by interrupted suturing. Retrospectively compare the pathoclinical features, operation time, bleeding, node retrieval, lateral margin and complications by t-text and χ(2) test respectively between ELAPE and APE procedures both by laparoscopic approach.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in term of age, gender, BMI, distance from anal verge, percentage of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and TNM staging between these two groups (all P > 0.05). The operation time was significantly shorter in ELAPE group ((181 ± 41) minutes vs. (228 ± 58) minutes, t = -3.265, P = 0.002). The bleeding volume was less in ELAPEE group (50 (80) ml vs 80 (100) ml (M(QR)), Z = -2.259, P = 0.024). The lateral margin, urinal retention and perineal wound healing were comparable for these two groups. No pelvic hernia was found during the postoperative follow-up (2 to 34 months) in both groups (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision without changing position is feasible for distal rectal cancer. Some essential steps can be simultaneously accomplished during operation without changing position. Closing the pelvic peritoneum is important for preventing the intestine dropping from abdominal cavity to presacral cavity.

摘要

目的

评估术中不改变体位的腹腔镜经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术(ELAPE)的短期疗效。

方法

2011年9月至2014年4月,共有51例低位进展期直肠癌患者在北京协和医院接受手术治疗。其中男性29例,女性22例,平均年龄(61±10)岁。26%的患者接受了术前同步放化疗。27例行腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术(APE),24例行ELAPE。两组患者术中均采用截石位-头低脚高位。除肿瘤侵犯外,坐骨直肠窝脂肪组织不常规切除。所有患者盆腔腹膜连续缝合关闭,皮下组织和皮肤间断缝合。采用t检验和χ²检验分别回顾性比较ELAPE组和APE组腹腔镜手术的病理临床特征、手术时间、出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、切缘情况及并发症。

结果

两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数、距肛缘距离、新辅助放化疗比例及TNM分期方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。ELAPE组手术时间明显短于APE组((181±41)分钟对(228±58)分钟,t=-3.265,P=0.002)。ELAPE组出血量少于APE组(50(80)ml对80(100)ml(中位数(四分位数间距)),Z=-2.259,P=0.024)。两组切缘、尿潴留及会阴伤口愈合情况相当。两组术后随访(2至34个月)均未发现盆腔疝(均P>0.05)。

结论

术中不改变体位的腹腔镜经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌是可行的。术中可不改变体位同时完成一些关键步骤。关闭盆腔腹膜对防止肠管从腹腔掉入骶前间隙很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验