Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Asian J Surg. 2020 Aug;43(8):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.11.004. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
This study is to evaluate trans-perineal minimally invasive approach for extralevator abdominoperineal excision (TP-ELAPE) in a synchronous lithotomy position for locally advanced low rectal cancer.
Between May 2013 and February 2016, 14 patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer underwent TP-ELAPE for the perineal phase of extralevator abdominoperineal excision, and 18 patients underwent conventional ELAPE.
There was no positive circumferential resection margin in both groups. Patients who received TP-ELAPE had similar bowel perforation rate (7.1% vs. 5.6%, p = 1.000), longer transperineal operative time (100 vs. 40 min, p < 0.001) and higher surgical difficulty visual analog scale (VAS) scores (6 vs. 2, p < 0.001), while had shorter total procedure time (215 vs. 260 min, p = 0.015), lower VAS pain scores on day 1 postoperatively (5 vs. 6.5, p = 0.049), shorter postoperative anus exhausting time (22 h vs 28 h, p = 0.006), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.5 d vs 13.5d, p = 0.028) compared with patients who received conventional ELAPE. There was no local recurrence with median follow-up time of 53 months in the TP-ELAPE group and 51 months in the conventional ELAPE group. There were no differences for disease-free survival (p = 0.835) and overall survival (p = 0.829) between groups.
TP-ELAPE approach in the synchronous lithotomy position might be a feasible approach for low rectal cancer, while ensuring a radical and safe surgical procedure.
本研究旨在评估经会阴微创入路(TP-ELAPE)在同步截石位下用于局部晚期低位直肠癌的腹会阴联合切除术(ELAPE)中的应用。
2013 年 5 月至 2016 年 2 月,14 例局部晚期低位直肠癌患者接受经会阴微创入路 ELAPE 会阴期手术,18 例患者接受传统 ELAPE。
两组均无阳性环周切缘。TP-ELAPE 组肠穿孔率与传统 ELAPE 组相似(7.1%比 5.6%,p=1.000),经会阴手术时间较长(100 分钟比 40 分钟,p<0.001),手术难度视觉模拟评分(VAS)较高(6 分比 2 分,p<0.001),但总手术时间较短(215 分钟比 260 分钟,p=0.015),术后第 1 天 VAS 疼痛评分较低(5 分比 6.5 分,p=0.049),术后肛门排气时间较短(22 小时比 28 小时,p=0.006),术后住院时间较短(11.5 天比 13.5 天,p=0.028)。中位随访 53 个月,TP-ELAPE 组无局部复发,传统 ELAPE 组中位随访 51 个月,两组无疾病无进展生存率(p=0.835)和总生存率(p=0.829)差异。
在同步截石位下,TP-ELAPE 方法可能是一种治疗低位直肠癌的可行方法,同时确保了根治性和安全性。