Suppr超能文献

贲门失弛缓症与长期使用阿片类药物:无辜旁观者还是相关病症?

Achalasia and chronic opiate use: innocent bystanders or associated conditions?

作者信息

Ravi K, Murray J A, Geno D M, Katzka D A

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2016 Jan;29(1):15-21. doi: 10.1111/dote.12291. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

Abstract

High-resolution manometry identifies three subtypes of achalasia. However, type 3 differs from classic achalasia. Although opiates affect esophageal motility, opiate use and achalasia have not been studied. Patients with a new diagnosis of achalasia at Mayo Clinic Rochester between June 1, 2012 and January 3, 2014 were identified. Clinical records were reviewed to assess symptoms, opiate use, and therapy. Fifty-six patients with achalasia were identified, 14 (25%) were on opiates. Opiate prescription was unrelated to achalasia in all cases, with chronic back and joint pain constituting the majority. Of patients on opiates, five (36%) had type 3 achalasia compared with four (10%) not on opiates (P = 0.02). No patients on opiates had type 1 achalasia. Clinical presentation did not differ with opiates, although those on opiates were more likely to report chest pain (39 vs. 14%, P = 0.05) and less likely to have esophageal dilation (62 vs. 82%, P = 0.13), none with greater than 5-cm diameter. Contractile vigor was greater with opiate use, with distal contractile integral of 7149 versus 2615.5 mmHg/cm/second (P = 0.08). Treatment response was inferior on opiates, with persistent symptoms in 22% compared with 3% without opiates (P = 0.06). Opiate use is common in type 3 achalasia, with the majority of patients on opiates. No patients on opiates were diagnosed with type 1 achalasia. Manometric findings of type 3 achalasia mimic those induced by opiates, suggesting a physiologic mechanism for opiate induced type 3 achalasia. Treatment outcome is inferior with opiates, with opiate cessation perhaps preferable. Further studies assessing opiate use and achalasia are needed.

摘要

高分辨率测压可识别出贲门失弛缓症的三种亚型。然而,3型与经典贲门失弛缓症不同。尽管阿片类药物会影响食管动力,但阿片类药物的使用与贲门失弛缓症之间尚未得到研究。我们确定了2012年6月1日至2014年1月3日期间在罗切斯特梅奥诊所新诊断为贲门失弛缓症的患者。回顾临床记录以评估症状、阿片类药物使用情况和治疗情况。共确定了56例贲门失弛缓症患者,其中14例(25%)正在使用阿片类药物。在所有病例中,阿片类药物处方与贲门失弛缓症无关,大多数是因慢性背部和关节疼痛。在使用阿片类药物的患者中,5例(36%)患有3型贲门失弛缓症,而未使用阿片类药物的患者中有4例(10%)患有3型贲门失弛缓症(P = 0.02)。没有使用阿片类药物的患者患有1型贲门失弛缓症。使用阿片类药物的患者临床表现并无差异,不过使用阿片类药物的患者更有可能报告胸痛(39%对14%,P = 0.05),且食管扩张的可能性较小(62%对82%,P = 0.13),食管直径均未超过5厘米。使用阿片类药物时收缩活力更大,远端收缩积分分别为7149与2615.5mmHg/cm/秒(P = 0.08)。使用阿片类药物时治疗反应较差,22%的患者症状持续,而未使用阿片类药物的患者中这一比例为3%(P = 0.06)。阿片类药物的使用在3型贲门失弛缓症中很常见,大多数患者使用阿片类药物。没有使用阿片类药物的患者被诊断为1型贲门失弛缓症。3型贲门失弛缓症的测压结果与阿片类药物诱导的结果相似,提示阿片类药物诱导3型贲门失弛缓症的生理机制。使用阿片类药物时治疗效果较差,或许停用阿片类药物更佳。需要进一步研究评估阿片类药物使用与贲门失弛缓症的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验