• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[耻骨上经脐胆囊切除术的手术时间:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果]

[Operation time for suprapubic transumbilical cholecystectomy: Results of a prospective randomized trial].

作者信息

Hipp J, Laniewski J, Gitei E, Elhabash S, Akkermann O, Gerdes B

机构信息

Klinik für Allgemeinchirurgie - Viszeral-,Thorax- und Endokrine Chirurgie, Klinikum Minden, Hans-Nolte-Str. 1, 32429, Minden, Deutschland.

出版信息

Chirurg. 2015 Sep;86(9):866-73. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2958-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00104-014-2958-9
PMID:25604307
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the last decade new innovative minimally invasive techniques (e.g. transvaginal cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy) have been developed to reduce operative trauma, postoperative pain and to achieve better cosmetic results. Nevertheless, most of these techniques are more difficult and time-consuming than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). A new approach, the Minden technique for combined suprapubic transumbilical cholecystectomy (MI-CHE) has been proven to provide a very good cosmetic outcome with reduced operative trauma. The aim of this study was to survey whether MI-CHE prolongs operation times to a relevant degree compared to CLC.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized between both techniques. The duration of the operation and other perioperative data were recorded. Surgery was performed by four resident surgeons who had not yet performed any technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, neither MI-CHE nor CLC but were assisted by the same senior staff surgeon in all cases. The two patient groups showed no differences in age, gender and body mass index. The study was registered (DRKS00003271). Non-inferiority was tested using 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

The mean operation time was shorter by - 4.2 min (95% CI, + 6.4 min to - 14.8 min) in the MI-CHE as compared to the CLC group (65.5 min versus 69.7 min). There were no open conversions but in one patient intestinal injury occurred during the umbilical mini-laparotomy. There were no differences in patient satisfaction and perioperative pain between both procedures.

CONCLUSION

The MI-CHE, which provides very good cosmetic results, is not more time-consuming than CLC. Additionally, it seems to be safe and not more difficult to learn than CLC.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,已开发出新型创新的微创技术(如经阴道胆囊切除术和单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术),以减少手术创伤、术后疼痛并获得更好的美容效果。然而,这些技术中的大多数比传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)更困难且耗时。一种新方法,即用于耻骨上经脐联合胆囊切除术(MI-CHE)的明登技术,已被证明能在减少手术创伤的同时提供非常好的美容效果。本研究的目的是调查与CLC相比,MI-CHE是否会在很大程度上延长手术时间。

方法

共有40例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者在两种技术之间进行随机分组。记录手术时间和其他围手术期数据。手术由四名尚未进行过任何腹腔镜胆囊切除术技术(既未进行过MI-CHE也未进行过CLC)的住院医师进行,但在所有病例中均由同一名资深 staff 外科医生协助。两组患者在年龄、性别和体重指数方面无差异。该研究已注册(DRKS00003271)。使用95%置信区间(95%CI)进行非劣效性检验。

结果

与CLC组相比,MI-CHE组的平均手术时间缩短了 -4.2分钟(95%CI,+6.4分钟至 -14.8分钟)(分别为65.5分钟和69.7分钟)。没有转为开放手术,但有一名患者在脐部小切口剖腹术期间发生肠损伤。两种手术在患者满意度和围手术期疼痛方面没有差异。

结论

提供非常好的美容效果的MI-CHE并不比CLC更耗时。此外,它似乎是安全的,并且学习起来并不比CLC更困难。

相似文献

1
[Operation time for suprapubic transumbilical cholecystectomy: Results of a prospective randomized trial].[耻骨上经脐胆囊切除术的手术时间:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果]
Chirurg. 2015 Sep;86(9):866-73. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2958-9.
2
[Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a retrospective case-control study].经阴道与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较——一项回顾性病例对照研究
Zentralbl Chir. 2012 Feb;137(1):48-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247332. Epub 2010 May 5.
3
[TULC - total umbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[全脐部腹腔镜胆囊切除术]
Zentralbl Chir. 2012 Feb;137(1):43-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262610. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
4
Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy.单孔与NOTES 胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比有临床或美容优势吗?一项比较单孔经阴道与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的病例对照研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2221-4.
5
Single umbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience of the Coelio Club.单脐部切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术:Coelio 俱乐部的初步经验。
J Visc Surg. 2010 Aug;147(4):e253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2010.07.012.
6
Single-access laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Jun;23(3):235-43. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828b8b4e.
7
Single umbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of the prospective trial of the Coelio Club.单脐孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:腹腔镜俱乐部前瞻性试验的结果。
J Visc Surg. 2012 Dec;149(6):417-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
8
A prospective, randomized, controlled, trial comparing occult-scar incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and classic three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验比较隐匿性瘢痕切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经典三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1131-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3289-5. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
9
Comparison of cosmetic outcome between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an objective study.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术美容效果的比较:一项客观研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Mar;22(2):127-30. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0391. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
10
[Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study].[经阴道胆囊切除术:一项随机研究的结果]
Chirurg. 2014 Sep;85(9):825-32. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2852-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress in the treatment of gallstones with laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery: a narrative review.腹腔镜与内镜手术治疗胆结石的研究进展:一项叙述性综述
BMC Surg. 2025 May 29;25(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02977-8.
2
Suprapubic Cholecystectomy Improves Cosmetic Outcome Compared to Classic Cholecystectomy.与传统胆囊切除术相比,耻骨上胆囊切除术改善了美容效果。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 5;11(15):4579. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154579.

本文引用的文献

1
[Transvaginal cholecystectomy: results of a randomized study].[经阴道胆囊切除术:一项随机研究的结果]
Chirurg. 2014 Sep;85(9):825-32. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2852-5.
2
Comparison of outcome and side effects between conventional and transvaginal laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Oct;24(5):395-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000066.
3
Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy.单孔与NOTES 胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比有临床或美容优势吗?一项比较单孔经阴道与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的病例对照研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2221-4.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在美容评分方面具有优势,但疝的发生率显著升高:传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术前瞻性随机、多中心、单盲临床试验的 1 年结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1037-47; discussion 1047-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
5
Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery.我们从过去的经验中吸取教训了吗?单孔腹腔镜手术培训的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1478-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2632-6. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析和系统评价。
World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2644-53. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1719-5.
7
[Single-port access cholecystectomy : current status].
Chirurg. 2011 May;82(5):406-10. doi: 10.1007/s00104-010-2005-4.
8
[Perception of natural orifice surgery. Results of a survey of female physicians and nursing staff].[自然腔道手术的认知。女性医生和护理人员的调查结果]
Chirurg. 2011 Aug;82(8):707-13. doi: 10.1007/s00104-011-2079-7.
9
Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: timing of repair and long-term outcomes.腹腔镜胆囊切除术相关胆管损伤:修复时机与长期预后
Arch Surg. 2010 Aug;145(8):757-63. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.153.
10
The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients.德国自然腔道内镜手术注册研究:551 例患者的初步报告。
Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):263-70. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e6240f.