Hipp J, Laniewski J, Gitei E, Elhabash S, Akkermann O, Gerdes B
Klinik für Allgemeinchirurgie - Viszeral-,Thorax- und Endokrine Chirurgie, Klinikum Minden, Hans-Nolte-Str. 1, 32429, Minden, Deutschland.
Chirurg. 2015 Sep;86(9):866-73. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2958-9.
Over the last decade new innovative minimally invasive techniques (e.g. transvaginal cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy) have been developed to reduce operative trauma, postoperative pain and to achieve better cosmetic results. Nevertheless, most of these techniques are more difficult and time-consuming than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). A new approach, the Minden technique for combined suprapubic transumbilical cholecystectomy (MI-CHE) has been proven to provide a very good cosmetic outcome with reduced operative trauma. The aim of this study was to survey whether MI-CHE prolongs operation times to a relevant degree compared to CLC.
A total of 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized between both techniques. The duration of the operation and other perioperative data were recorded. Surgery was performed by four resident surgeons who had not yet performed any technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, neither MI-CHE nor CLC but were assisted by the same senior staff surgeon in all cases. The two patient groups showed no differences in age, gender and body mass index. The study was registered (DRKS00003271). Non-inferiority was tested using 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
The mean operation time was shorter by - 4.2 min (95% CI, + 6.4 min to - 14.8 min) in the MI-CHE as compared to the CLC group (65.5 min versus 69.7 min). There were no open conversions but in one patient intestinal injury occurred during the umbilical mini-laparotomy. There were no differences in patient satisfaction and perioperative pain between both procedures.
The MI-CHE, which provides very good cosmetic results, is not more time-consuming than CLC. Additionally, it seems to be safe and not more difficult to learn than CLC.
在过去十年中,已开发出新型创新的微创技术(如经阴道胆囊切除术和单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术),以减少手术创伤、术后疼痛并获得更好的美容效果。然而,这些技术中的大多数比传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)更困难且耗时。一种新方法,即用于耻骨上经脐联合胆囊切除术(MI-CHE)的明登技术,已被证明能在减少手术创伤的同时提供非常好的美容效果。本研究的目的是调查与CLC相比,MI-CHE是否会在很大程度上延长手术时间。
共有40例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者在两种技术之间进行随机分组。记录手术时间和其他围手术期数据。手术由四名尚未进行过任何腹腔镜胆囊切除术技术(既未进行过MI-CHE也未进行过CLC)的住院医师进行,但在所有病例中均由同一名资深 staff 外科医生协助。两组患者在年龄、性别和体重指数方面无差异。该研究已注册(DRKS00003271)。使用95%置信区间(95%CI)进行非劣效性检验。
与CLC组相比,MI-CHE组的平均手术时间缩短了 -4.2分钟(95%CI,+6.4分钟至 -14.8分钟)(分别为65.5分钟和69.7分钟)。没有转为开放手术,但有一名患者在脐部小切口剖腹术期间发生肠损伤。两种手术在患者满意度和围手术期疼痛方面没有差异。
提供非常好的美容效果的MI-CHE并不比CLC更耗时。此外,它似乎是安全的,并且学习起来并不比CLC更困难。