Suppr超能文献

关于避孕方法停用的研究是否涉及女性自身的原因?一项批判性综述。

Does research into contraceptive method discontinuation address women's own reasons? A critical review.

作者信息

Inoue Kumiyo, Barratt Alexandra, Richters Juliet

机构信息

PhD Candidate, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia and Adjunct Senior Lecturer, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

Professor, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015 Oct;41(4):292-9. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2014-100976. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical and epidemiological literature addressing contraceptive method change or discontinuation and to assess whether the documented reasons reflected women's experiences.

METHODS

Major databases including Medline and PsycINFO were searched using keywords related to contraception and discontinuation, adherence and satisfaction, for articles published between January 2003 and February 2013. Studies in developed countries that focused on women of reproductive age and reasons for method change or discontinuation were included. Reasons reported were categorised and examined.

RESULTS

A total of 123 papers were reviewed in detail. Medical terminology was generally used to describe reasons for method discontinuation. The top two reported reasons were bleeding and pregnancy, but there was a lack of consensus about the categorisation of reasons. Broad categories that were not self-explanatory were included in more than half of the papers, often without further explanation. Only 12 studies expanded on categories containing 'other', 'non-medical' or 'personal' reasons. Eight papers included categories that attributed discontinuation to the participant, such as 'dissatisfied with method'.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies of reasons for discontinuation of contraceptives do not well describe women's specific reasons. Studies rely heavily on medical terms and often fail to document women's subjective experiences. Future studies should create an opportunity for women to articulate their non-medical reasons in their own words, including those related to their sexual lives. Furthermore, researchers should distinguish, if possible, between reasons for discontinuation of a method and reasons for ceasing participation in a research study.

摘要

目的

查阅关于避孕方法变更或停用的临床及流行病学文献,并评估所记录的原因是否反映了女性的经历。

方法

使用与避孕及停用、依从性和满意度相关的关键词,检索包括Medline和PsycINFO在内的主要数据库,以查找2003年1月至2013年2月发表的文章。纳入关注育龄女性及方法变更或停用原因的发达国家研究。对报告的原因进行分类和审查。

结果

共详细审查了123篇论文。通常使用医学术语来描述方法停用的原因。报告的前两大原因是出血和怀孕,但对于原因的分类缺乏共识。超过半数的论文纳入了含义不明确的宽泛类别,且往往没有进一步解释。只有12项研究对包含“其他”“非医学”或“个人”原因的类别进行了详细阐述。八篇论文纳入了将停用归因于参与者的类别,如“对方法不满意”。

结论

关于避孕药具停用原因的研究未能很好地描述女性的具体原因。研究严重依赖医学术语,且常常未能记录女性的主观经历。未来的研究应创造机会让女性用自己的语言阐明其非医学原因,包括与性生活相关的原因。此外,研究人员应尽可能区分方法停用的原因和停止参与研究的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验