Sexual Health Services, New Croft Centre, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 3;12(10):e060606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060606.
No copper intrauterine device (IUD) type is known to better suit young nulliparous women who tend to experience higher rates of IUD discontinuation compared with their older parous counterparts. A systematic review to determine which IUDs have higher continuation rates in young nulliparous women was undertaken.
Systematic review and meta-analyses of available evidence based on IUD type.
AMED, BNI, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, EMCARE, HMIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, TRIP, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception to 11 May 2022; as well as the Bandolier, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Department of Health, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines, WHO and Google Scholar websites.
All studies on IUDs currently available in the UK or comparable (same design and size) to those available in the UK, involving nulliparous women of any age including those aged under 30.
Independently extracted data were assessed as low risk of bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Random effects meta-analyses of proportions were performed where data, including subgroups, were amenable to quantitative synthesis. Heterogeneity was reported using tau and I statistics, and sensitivity analyses were also performed.
Nineteen studies involving 13 045 nulliparous women were included but the heterogeneity of participant ages, parity and IUD types made quantitative synthesis of outcome data in totality inappropriate. The highest continuation rate obtained was 91.02% (95% CI 88.01% to 93.64%) for the smaller TCu 380A at 12 months post insertion.
Evidence for IUD use in young nulliparous women based on IUD type remains limited. Smaller sized IUD types appear better suited to this group of IUD users, however, more research is needed.
CRD42019120969.
目前尚不清楚哪种铜宫内节育器(IUD)更适合年轻的未产妇,与年龄较大的经产妇相比,她们的 IUD 取出率更高。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价,旨在确定哪种 IUD 在年轻的未产妇中续用率更高。
基于 IUD 类型的系统评价和荟萃分析。
从建库至 2022 年 5 月 11 日,检索了 AMED、BNI、CINAHL、DARE、EMBASE、EMCARE、HMIC、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、PubMed、TRIP 和 Cochrane 图书馆电子数据库;还检索了 Bandolier、药品和保健产品监管局、性健康和生殖健康学院、皇家妇产科医师学院、卫生部、国家卫生与保健卓越研究所、苏格兰校际指南、世界卫生组织和谷歌学术网站。
所有目前在英国使用的 IUD 研究,或与英国可比较(设计和尺寸相同)的 IUD 研究,纳入任何年龄的未产妇,包括 30 岁以下的未产妇。
使用混合方法评估工具独立提取数据,并评估为低偏倚风险。如果数据(包括亚组)可进行定量综合,则进行随机效应荟萃分析。使用 tau 和 I 统计量报告异质性,并进行敏感性分析。
纳入了 19 项研究,涉及 13045 名未产妇,但由于参与者年龄、产次和 IUD 类型的异质性,使得对所有数据的汇总分析不恰当。在 12 个月的随访中,TCu380A 的续用率最高,为 91.02%(95%CI 88.01%至 93.64%)。
基于 IUD 类型的年轻未产妇使用 IUD 的证据仍然有限。较小尺寸的 IUD 类型似乎更适合这组 IUD 用户,但仍需要更多的研究。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019120969。