Suppr超能文献

[恶性高热易感性的筛查试验]

[Screening tests for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility].

作者信息

Krivosic-Horber R, Adnet P

机构信息

Department d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale I, Hôpital B, CHR, Lille.

出版信息

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1989;8(5):444-56. doi: 10.1016/S0750-7658(89)80011-5.

Abstract

The ideal screening test for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility (MHS) has yet to be discovered. It should be simple noninvasive, yet totally specific and sensitive. Until such an ideal test becomes available, allowing simple routine preoperative screening, tests should only be used in certain specific situations. These include: patients in whom a clinical crisis was suspected; the members of the family of a subject labeled MHS because of a fatal, or otherwise, crisis, or in whom tests were positive; patients with other pathological conditions which could be linked to malignant hyperthermia (MH) (some myopathies, effort or stress MH, neuroleptic malignant syndrome). The various tests proposed in the literature aim at revealing MHN subjects, using or not a triggering agent, halothane most often. However, detecting these abnormalities sometimes gives greater insight into the physiopathology of MH than in the detection of an individual patient's susceptibility. The tests have been classified as in vivo, electrophysiological, blood, and in vitro muscle biochemical, morphological, and pharmacological tests. The discovery of new tests gives renewed hope: CPK levels, platelet tests, calcium sarcoplasmic reticular reuptake, lymphocyte Quin 2 test, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. However, experts worldwide agree that the only reference test to this day remains the in vitro halothane caffeine contracture tests. These tests have shown their reliability; they must be performed on muscle strips obtained from surgically removed muscle biopsies, by laboratories used to this technique and who have at their disposal a sufficiently large group of MHS subjects with a clear-cut clinical crisis, as well as controls. The patients must therefore travel to these laboratories. The design of common protocols for European laboratories on one hand, and the North American laboratories on the other, is a good guarantee of the reliability of these tests.

摘要

尚未找到用于筛查恶性高热易感性(MHS)的理想检测方法。该检测方法应简单、无创,且具有完全的特异性和敏感性。在找到这样一种理想的检测方法以实现简单的术前常规筛查之前,检测仅应在某些特定情况下使用。这些情况包括:疑似发生临床危象的患者;因致命或其他危象而被标记为MHS的受试者的家庭成员,或检测呈阳性的家庭成员;患有其他可能与恶性高热(MH)相关的病理状况的患者(某些肌病、运动或应激性MH、神经阻滞剂恶性综合征)。文献中提出的各种检测旨在揭示MH易感个体,使用或不使用触发剂,最常用的是氟烷。然而,检测这些异常情况有时对MH的生理病理学的了解比对个体患者易感性的检测更深入。这些检测已被分类为体内检测、电生理检测、血液检测以及体外肌肉生化、形态学和药理学检测。新检测方法的发现带来了新的希望:肌酸磷酸激酶(CPK)水平检测、血小板检测、肌浆网钙再摄取检测、淋巴细胞喹啉2检测、核磁共振波谱检测。然而,全世界的专家一致认为,迄今为止唯一的参考检测方法仍然是体外氟烷咖啡因挛缩试验。这些检测已证明了其可靠性;必须由熟悉该技术且拥有足够多明确临床危象的MHS受试者及对照的实验室,对手术切除的肌肉活检组织获取的肌肉条进行检测。因此,患者必须前往这些实验室。一方面为欧洲实验室,另一方面为北美实验室设计通用方案,是这些检测可靠性的良好保证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验