Informatics and Biocomputing Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada. Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 15;21(6):1477-86. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1749. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
While the dysregulation of specific pathways in cancer influences both treatment response and outcome, few current prognostic markers explicitly consider differential pathway activation. Here we explore this concept, focusing on K-Ras mutations in lung adenocarcinoma (present in 25%-35% of patients).
The effect of K-Ras mutation status on prognostic accuracy of existing signatures was evaluated in 404 patients. Genes associated with K-Ras mutation status were identified and used to create a RAS pathway activation classifier to provide a more accurate measure of RAS pathway status. Next, 8 million random signatures were evaluated to assess differences in prognosing patients with or without RAS activation. Finally, a prognostic signature was created to target patients with RAS pathway activation.
We first show that K-Ras status influences the accuracy of existing prognostic signatures, which are effective in K-Ras-wild-type patients but fail in patients with K-Ras mutations. Next, we show that it is fundamentally more difficult to predict the outcome of patients with RAS activation (RAS(mt)) than that of those without (RAS(wt)). More importantly, we demonstrate that different signatures are prognostic in RAS(wt) and RAS(mt). Finally, to exploit this discovery, we create separate prognostic signatures for RAS(wt) and RAS(mt) patients and show that combining them significantly improves predictions of patient outcome.
We present a nested model for integrated genomic and transcriptomic data. This model is general and is not limited to lung adenocarcinomas but can be expanded to other tumor types and oncogenes.
虽然癌症中特定途径的失调会影响治疗反应和结果,但目前很少有预后标志物明确考虑到差异途径的激活。在这里,我们探讨了这一概念,重点关注肺腺癌中的 K-Ras 突变(存在于 25%-35%的患者中)。
在 404 名患者中评估了 K-Ras 突变状态对现有标志物预测准确性的影响。鉴定与 K-Ras 突变状态相关的基因,并用于创建 RAS 途径激活分类器,以更准确地衡量 RAS 途径状态。接下来,评估了 800 万个随机签名,以评估在预测具有或不具有 RAS 激活的患者方面的差异。最后,创建了一个预后签名来针对具有 RAS 途径激活的患者。
我们首先表明 K-Ras 状态会影响现有预后标志物的准确性,这些标志物在 K-Ras 野生型患者中有效,但在 K-Ras 突变患者中无效。接下来,我们表明,预测具有 RAS 激活(RAS(mt))的患者的结果比预测没有 RAS 激活(RAS(wt))的患者更困难。更重要的是,我们证明了不同的签名在 RAS(wt)和 RAS(mt)患者中具有预后意义。最后,为了利用这一发现,我们为 RAS(wt)和 RAS(mt)患者创建了单独的预后签名,并表明将它们结合使用可显著提高对患者结局的预测。
我们提出了一种用于综合基因组和转录组数据的嵌套模型。该模型具有通用性,不仅限于肺腺癌,还可以扩展到其他肿瘤类型和致癌基因。