Suppr超能文献

早期直肠癌:欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)临床共识会议

Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference.

作者信息

Morino Mario, Risio Mauro, Bach Simon, Beets-Tan Regina, Bujko Krzysztof, Panis Yves, Quirke Philip, Rembacken Bjorn, Rullier Eric, Saito Yutaka, Young-Fadok Tonia, Allaix Marco Ettore

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):755-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4067-3. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The last 30 years have witnessed a significant increase in the diagnosis of early-stage rectal cancer and the development of new strategies to reduce the treatment-related morbidity. Currently, there is no consensus on the definition of early rectal cancer (ERC), and the best management of ERC has not been yet defined. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery in collaboration with the European Society of Coloproctology developed this consensus conference to provide recommendations on ERC diagnosis, staging and treatment based on the available evidence.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of experts selected on their clinical and scientific expertise was invited to critically review the literature and to formulate evidence-based recommendations by the Delphi method. Recommendations were discussed at the plenary session of the 14th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Paris, 26 June 2014, and then posted on the EAES website for open discussion.

RESULTS

Tumour biopsy has a low accuracy. Digital rectal examination plays a key role in the pre-operative work-up. Magnification chromoendoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are complementary staging modalities. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery are the two established approaches for local excision (LE) of selected ERC. The role of all organ-sparing approaches including neoadjuvant therapies followed by LE should be formally assessed by randomized controlled trials. Rectal resection and total mesorectal excision is indicated in the presence of unfavourable features at the pathological evaluation of the LE specimen. The laparoscopic approach has better short-term outcomes and similar oncologic results when compared with open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of ERC should always be based on a multidisciplinary approach, aiming to increase the rate of organ-preserving procedures without jeopardizing survival.

摘要

背景

在过去30年中,早期直肠癌的诊断显著增加,并且出现了降低治疗相关发病率的新策略。目前,对于早期直肠癌(ERC)的定义尚无共识,并且ERC的最佳治疗方案也尚未明确。欧洲内镜外科学会与欧洲结直肠外科学会合作召开了本次共识会议,旨在根据现有证据就ERC的诊断、分期和治疗提供建议。

方法

邀请了一组根据临床和科学专业知识挑选出的多学科专家,对文献进行严格审查,并通过德尔菲法制定基于证据的建议。这些建议在2014年6月26日于巴黎举行的第14届世界内镜外科学大会全体会议上进行了讨论,随后发布在EAES网站上以供公开讨论。

结果

肿瘤活检准确性较低。直肠指检在术前检查中起关键作用。放大染色内镜检查、内镜超声和磁共振成像为互补的分期方式。内镜黏膜下剥离术和经肛门内镜显微手术是选定的ERC局部切除(LE)的两种既定方法。所有保留器官的方法,包括新辅助治疗后行LE的作用,均应由随机对照试验进行正式评估。如果LE标本的病理评估存在不良特征,则需行直肠切除和全直肠系膜切除术。与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术具有更好的短期疗效和相似的肿瘤学结果。

结论

ERC的治疗应始终基于多学科方法,旨在提高保留器官手术的比例,同时不影响生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验