Morrison Charles S, Chen Pai-Lien, Kwok Cynthia, Baeten Jared M, Brown Joelle, Crook Angela M, Van Damme Lut, Delany-Moretlwe Sinead, Francis Suzanna C, Friedland Barbara A, Hayes Richard J, Heffron Renee, Kapiga Saidi, Karim Quarraisha Abdool, Karpoff Stephanie, Kaul Rupert, McClelland R Scott, McCormack Sheena, McGrath Nuala, Myer Landon, Rees Helen, van der Straten Ariane, Watson-Jones Deborah, van de Wijgert Janneke H H M, Stalter Randy, Low Nicola
Clinical Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Biostatistics, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS Med. 2015 Jan 22;12(1):e1001778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001778. eCollection 2015 Jan.
Observational studies of a putative association between hormonal contraception (HC) and HIV acquisition have produced conflicting results. We conducted an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of studies from sub-Saharan Africa to compare the incidence of HIV infection in women using combined oral contraceptives (COCs) or the injectable progestins depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) with women not using HC.
Eligible studies measured HC exposure and incident HIV infection prospectively using standardized measures, enrolled women aged 15-49 y, recorded ≥15 incident HIV infections, and measured prespecified covariates. Our primary analysis estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) using two-stage random effects meta-analysis, controlling for region, marital status, age, number of sex partners, and condom use. We included 18 studies, including 37,124 women (43,613 woman-years) and 1,830 incident HIV infections. Relative to no HC use, the aHR for HIV acquisition was 1.50 (95% CI 1.24-1.83) for DMPA use, 1.24 (95% CI 0.84-1.82) for NET-EN use, and 1.03 (95% CI 0.88-1.20) for COC use. Between-study heterogeneity was mild (I(2) < 50%). DMPA use was associated with increased HIV acquisition compared with COC use (aHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.67) and NET-EN use (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 1.08-1.61). Effect estimates were attenuated for studies at lower risk of methodological bias (compared with no HC use, aHR for DMPA use 1.22, 95% CI 0.99-1.50; for NET-EN use 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.96; and for COC use 0.91, 95% CI 0.73-1.41) compared to those at higher risk of bias (p(interaction) = 0.003). Neither age nor herpes simplex virus type 2 infection status modified the HC-HIV relationship.
This IPD meta-analysis found no evidence that COC or NET-EN use increases women's risk of HIV but adds to the evidence that DMPA may increase HIV risk, underscoring the need for additional safe and effective contraceptive options for women at high HIV risk. A randomized controlled trial would provide more definitive evidence about the effects of hormonal contraception, particularly DMPA, on HIV risk.
关于激素避孕(HC)与感染艾滋病毒之间假定关联的观察性研究结果相互矛盾。我们对撒哈拉以南非洲地区的研究进行了个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析,以比较使用复方口服避孕药(COC)、注射用孕激素醋酸甲羟孕酮(DMPA)或庚酸炔诺酮(NET-EN)的女性与未使用HC的女性中艾滋病毒感染的发生率。
符合条件的研究采用标准化方法前瞻性地测量HC暴露和新发艾滋病毒感染情况,纳入年龄在15至49岁之间的女性,记录≥15例新发艾滋病毒感染,并测量预先指定的协变量。我们的主要分析使用两阶段随机效应荟萃分析估计调整后的风险比(aHR),控制地区、婚姻状况、年龄、性伴侣数量和避孕套使用情况。我们纳入了18项研究,包括37124名女性(43613女性年)和1830例新发艾滋病毒感染。与未使用HC相比,使用DMPA的女性感染艾滋病毒的aHR为1.50(95%CI 1.24-1.83),使用NET-EN的为1.24(95%CI 0.84-1.82),使用COC的为1.03(95%CI 0.88-1.20)。研究间异质性较轻(I²<50%)。与使用COC(aHR 1.43,95%CI 1.23-1.67)和NET-EN(aHR 1.32,95%CI 1.08-1.61)相比,使用DMPA与感染艾滋病毒的风险增加有关。对于方法学偏倚风险较低的研究,效应估计值减弱(与未使用HC相比,使用DMPA的aHR为1.22,95%CI 0.99-1.50;使用NET-EN的为0.67,95%CI 0.47-0.96;使用COC的为0.91,95%CI 0.73-1.41),而偏倚风险较高的研究则不然(p(交互作用)=0.003)。年龄和单纯疱疹病毒2型感染状态均未改变HC与艾滋病毒之间的关系。
这项IPD荟萃分析没有发现证据表明使用COC或NET-EN会增加女性感染艾滋病毒的风险,但增加了DMPA可能增加艾滋病毒风险的证据,强调了为艾滋病毒高风险女性提供更多安全有效的避孕选择的必要性。一项随机对照试验将为激素避孕,特别是DMPA对艾滋病毒风险的影响提供更确凿的证据。