Thanoi Wareerat, Klainin-Yobas Piyanee
Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, 2 Prannok Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 May;35(5):641-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
Rumination is one of the risk factors for mental health problems among nursing students. Rumination refers to repetitive thoughts focusing on negative emotions. There is a need to use an appropriate instrument to detect rumination to prevent the development of emotional problems. The ruminative response scale (RRS) is an instrument widely used to assess rumination levels in adult populations. It is inconclusive if the scale can be used for younger people like nursing students.
This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the 10-item ruminative response scale (RRS-10) in undergraduate nursing students.
A cross-sectional research design was used.
This study was undertaken at one of the universities in Thailand.
A sample of 747 undergraduate nursing students was recruited.
Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire, containing the 10-item RRS and Thoughts, Feelings and Experiences Questionnaire, and personal information. Exploratory/confirmatory factor analyses and correlational analyses were performed to test the construct and concurrent validity of the RRS respectively. Cronbach's alphas were used as parameters for the internal consistency reliability.
The RRS-10 had two distinct factors: brooding (moody pondering) and reflection (analysing depression-relating situations). Adequate model fit indices were obtained and significant factor loadings were observed, indicating acceptable construct validity. These two factors had significant correlations with emotional distress, depression, anxiety, and hopelessness, supporting concurrent validity of the scale. Cronbach's alphas were 0.71 and 0.73 for the brooding and reflection factors respectively, suggesting good reliability.
The RRS-10 demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. Therefore, it can be used to assess rumination response style among undergraduate nursing students in Thailand. Future research can test the scale on nursing students or youths in other countries.
反刍思维是护理专业学生心理健康问题的风险因素之一。反刍思维是指反复出现的聚焦于负面情绪的想法。有必要使用合适的工具来检测反刍思维,以预防情绪问题的发展。反刍反应量表(RRS)是一种广泛用于评估成年人群反刍思维水平的工具。该量表是否可用于像护理专业学生这样的年轻人尚无定论。
本研究旨在检验10项反刍反应量表(RRS-10)在本科护理专业学生中的心理测量学特性。
采用横断面研究设计。
本研究在泰国的一所大学进行。
招募了747名本科护理专业学生作为样本。
通过一份自填式问卷收集数据,问卷包含10项RRS、思想、情感和经历问卷以及个人信息。分别进行探索性/验证性因素分析和相关性分析,以检验RRS的结构效度和同时效度。使用Cronbach's α系数作为内部一致性信度的参数。
RRS-10有两个不同的因素:沉思(忧郁的沉思)和反思(分析与抑郁相关的情况)。获得了足够的模型拟合指数,并观察到显著的因素负荷,表明具有可接受的结构效度。这两个因素与情绪困扰、抑郁、焦虑和绝望有显著相关性,支持该量表的同时效度。沉思和反思因素的Cronbach's α系数分别为0.71和0.73,表明信度良好。
RRS-10表现出令人满意的心理测量学特性。因此,它可用于评估泰国本科护理专业学生的反刍反应方式。未来的研究可以在其他国家的护理专业学生或年轻人中测试该量表。