• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the 10-item ruminative response scale in Chinese university students.中文版10项沉思反应量表在中国大学生中的心理测量学特性
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 28;17(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1318-y.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the 10-Item Ruminative Response Scale Among Undergraduates and Depressive Patients.中文版10项反刍反应量表在大学生和抑郁症患者中的心理测量学特性
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 26;12:626859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.626859. eCollection 2021.
3
Assessing rumination response style among undergraduate nursing students: A construct validation study.评估本科护理专业学生的反刍反应方式:一项结构效度研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 May;35(5):641-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
4
Is the widely used two-factor structure of the Ruminative Responses Scale invariant across different samples of women?反思反应量表的广泛使用的两因素结构是否在不同女性样本中具有不变性?
Psychol Psychother. 2018 Sep;91(3):398-416. doi: 10.1111/papt.12168. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
5
Measurement Invariance of the Ruminative Responses Scale Across Gender.反刍反应量表在性别上的测量不变性。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):508-517. doi: 10.1177/1073191118774131. Epub 2018 May 29.
6
On the measurement of rumination: a psychometric evaluation of the ruminative response scale and the rumination on sadness scale in undergraduates.关于反刍思维的测量:大学生反刍反应量表和悲伤反刍量表的心理测量学评估
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;37(4):299-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.03.002. Epub 2006 May 5.
7
The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D): Measurement equivalence across gender groups in Hispanic college students.流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-D):西班牙裔大学生中性别群体的测量等效性。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Sep;219:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 May 14.
8
Validating the bifactor structure of the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire-A psychometric study.验证反刍思维风格问卷的双因素结构:一项心理测量学研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 26;16(7):e0254986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254986. eCollection 2021.
9
Psychometric properties of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) in Chinese undergraduates and depressive patients.中文版康耐尔-戴维森韧性量表(CD-RISC-10)在大学生和抑郁患者中的心理测量特性。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 15;261:211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.018. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
10
Translation and initial validation of the Japanese version of the Ruminative Responses Scale.反刍反应量表日文版的翻译与初步验证。
Psychol Rep. 2013 Jun;112(3):716-26. doi: 10.2466/02.08.PR0.112.3.716-726.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on work-related rumination and job fatigue of medical emergency and accident management center staff: an experimental study.接纳与承诺疗法对医疗急救与事故管理中心员工工作相关反刍和工作疲劳的影响:一项实验研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06150-y.
2
Semantic inhibition impairment in college students with depressive states as evidenced by EEG and pupillometry during the hayling task.在 Hayling 任务中,使用 EEG 和瞳孔测量法发现抑郁状态大学生存在语义抑制损伤。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 15;14(1):24089. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75511-0.
3
Linking Self-Esteem to Problematic Mobile Phone Use: A Moderated Mediation Model of Fear of Missing Out and Ruminative Subtypes.将自尊与有问题的手机使用联系起来:错失恐惧和反刍亚型的调节中介模型。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;14(8):683. doi: 10.3390/bs14080683.
4
The Association Between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Mobile Phone Addiction Among Overseas Chinese Students During COVID-19: The Mediating Roles of Perceived Stress and Rumination.新冠疫情期间海外留学生不确定性不耐受与手机成瘾的关系:感知压力和沉思的中介作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Jul 3;17:2573-2585. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S463399. eCollection 2024.
5
Bridge symptoms between parenting styles and proximal psychological risk factors associated with adolescent suicidal thoughts: a network analysis.养育方式与青少年自杀念头相关的近端心理风险因素之间的桥梁症状:一项网络分析
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 Nov 15;17(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00674-z.
6
An open-label pilot trial assessing tolerability and feasibility of LSD microdosing in patients with major depressive disorder (LSDDEP1).一项开放性试点试验,评估迷幻剂小剂量给药对重度抑郁症患者的耐受性和可行性(LSDDEP1)。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Oct 5;9(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01399-8.
7
The relationship between physical exercise and mobile phone addiction among Chinese college students: Testing mediation and moderation effects.中国大学生体育锻炼与手机成瘾之间的关系:中介效应与调节效应检验
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 3;13:1000109. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000109. eCollection 2022.
8
Cross-cultural and gender invariance of emotion regulation in the United States and India.中美印三国情绪调节的跨文化和性别不变性。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Dec 1;295:1360-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.089. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
9
Passive and active suicidal ideation among left-behind children in rural China: An evaluation of intrapersonal and interpersonal vulnerability and resilience.农村留守儿童的被动和主动自杀意念:个体内部和人际脆弱性与复原力的评估。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Dec;51(6):1213-1223. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12802. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the 10-Item Ruminative Response Scale Among Undergraduates and Depressive Patients.中文版10项反刍反应量表在大学生和抑郁症患者中的心理测量学特性
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 26;12:626859. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.626859. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing maladaptive repetitive thought in clinical disorders: A critical review of existing measures.评估临床障碍中的适应不良性重复思维:现有测量方法的批判性回顾。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Apr;53:14-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
2
[The relationship between Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) and depression, anxiety: Meta-analysis].[认知情绪调节问卷(CERQ)与抑郁、焦虑的关系:荟萃分析]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2016 Jun;87(2):179-85. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.87.15302.
3
Rumination in Adolescence: the Distinctive Impact of Brooding and Reflection on Psychopathology.青少年的反刍思维:沉思和反思对精神病理学的独特影响。
Span J Psychol. 2016 Jun 20;19:E37. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.41.
4
Assessing rumination response style among undergraduate nursing students: A construct validation study.评估本科护理专业学生的反刍反应方式:一项结构效度研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 May;35(5):641-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
5
Thinking about rumination: the scholarly contributions and intellectual legacy of Susan Nolen-Hoeksema.思考反刍:苏珊·诺伦-霍克西玛的学术贡献和知识遗产。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2015;11:1-22. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112733. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
6
Constraints of recreational sport participation: measurement invariance and latent mean differences across sex and physical activity status.休闲体育参与的限制因素:性别和身体活动状况的测量不变性及潜在均值差异
Percept Mot Skills. 2014 Oct;119(2):363-76. doi: 10.2466/06.03.PMS.119c24z0. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
7
Development and assessment of brief versions of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Ruminative Response Scale.宾夕法尼亚州立大学忧虑问卷和反刍反应量表简版的编制与评估
Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Nov;53(4):402-21. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12052. Epub 2014 May 2.
8
'Weakest Link' as a Cognitive Vulnerability Within the Hopelessness Theory of Depression in Chinese University Students.“最薄弱环节”作为中国大学生抑郁无望理论中的一种认知脆弱性
Stress Health. 2016 Feb;32(1):20-7. doi: 10.1002/smi.2571. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the revised korean version of ruminative response scale.反思反应量表修订版韩文版的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
Psychiatry Investig. 2014 Jan;11(1):59-64. doi: 10.4306/pi.2014.11.1.59. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Gender differences in rumination: A meta-analysis.沉思中的性别差异:一项元分析。
Pers Individ Dif. 2013 Aug;55(4):367-374. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.019.

中文版10项沉思反应量表在中国大学生中的心理测量学特性

Psychometric properties of the 10-item ruminative response scale in Chinese university students.

作者信息

Lei Xiaoxia, Zhong Mingtian, Liu Ying, Xi Chang, Ling Yu, Zhu Xiongzhao, Yao Shuqiao, Yi Jinyao

机构信息

Medical Psychological Center, Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, #139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, China.

Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 28;17(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1318-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-017-1318-y
PMID:28454569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5410038/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rumination increases vulnerability to depression, exacerbates and perpetuates negative moods. This study was aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the 10-item Ruminative Response Scale (RRS-10) in a large undergraduate sample.

METHODS

A sample of 5,236 university students finished the RRS and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed to examine the two-factor structure and the measurement equivalence of the RRS-10 across gender. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, correlations among RRS, RRS-10 and CES-D were also explored. In addition, gender difference on rumination and the relationship between rumination and depression were further investigated.

RESULTS

The two-factor model of RRS-10 fit the data reasonably and had acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability in Chinese undergraduates sample. And the measurement equivalence of the RRS-10 was acceptable across gender in Chinese university students. Findings in respect of latent means and manifest means revealed non-significant gender difference in RRS-10. Besides, participants with high-level rumination had more depressive symptoms than those with low-level rumination.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese version of the RRS-10 showed good psychometric properties and was measurement invariant across gender in undergraduates.

摘要

背景

反刍思维会增加患抑郁症的易感性,加剧并持续负面情绪。本研究旨在检验中文版10项反刍反应量表(RRS-10)在大量本科生样本中的心理测量特性。

方法

5236名大学生完成了RRS和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)。进行验证性因素分析(CFA)以检验RRS-10的双因素结构和跨性别测量等效性。还探讨了内部一致性、重测信度、RRS、RRS-10与CES-D之间的相关性。此外,进一步研究了反刍思维的性别差异以及反刍思维与抑郁之间的关系。

结果

RRS-10的双因素模型与数据拟合良好,在中国本科生样本中具有可接受的内部一致性和重测信度。RRS-10在中国大学生中的测量等效性在不同性别间是可接受的。关于潜在均值和显在均值的研究结果显示,RRS-10在性别上无显著差异。此外,高反刍思维水平的参与者比低反刍思维水平的参与者有更多抑郁症状。

结论

中文版RRS-10显示出良好的心理测量特性,且在本科生中跨性别测量不变。