• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国预防服务工作组的FRAX阈值在检测50至64岁女性骨质疏松症方面敏感性较低。

US Preventative Services Task Force FRAX threshold has a low sensitivity to detect osteoporosis in women ages 50-64 years.

作者信息

Bansal S, Pecina J L, Merry S P, Kennel K A, Maxson J, Quigg S, Thacher T D

机构信息

Fremont Family Care, Fremont, NE, USA.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2015 Apr;26(4):1429-33. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3026-0. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00198-015-3026-0
PMID:25614141
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends consideration for screening for osteoporosis in women under age 65 who have an estimated 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk of 9.3 % or higher. We found that this threshold for osteoporosis screening in women ages 50-64 years old has a low sensitivity to detect osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION

The US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends consideration of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in women under ages 50-64 with a major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) risk of 9.3 % or higher, as estimated by the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) tool. We assessed the performance of the 9.3 % MOF risk threshold for detecting osteoporosis and evaluated whether DXA indication appeared appropriate, based on USPSTF criteria and other risk factors, at our institution.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective record review of women ages 50-64.5 years old to determine clinical factors and FRAX scores of women undergoing a DXA at our institution over a 6-month period after the USPSTF recommendations were released and evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the 9.3 % MOF threshold to detect densitometric osteoporosis. Additionally, using the USPSTF criteria and several additional risk factors, we evaluated the extent of potentially inappropriate DXA use in women ages 50 to 64 years in a large primary care practice in an academic medical center.

RESULTS

The analysis included 465 DXA tests. The overall sensitivity and specificity of a FRAX-calculated MOF risk ≥9.3 % was 37 and 74 %, respectively, for the detection of osteoporosis. The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.58. Lowering the FRAX risk threshold to 5.5 % would increase the sensitivity of detecting osteoporosis in our population from 37 to 80 % while reducing the specificity from 74 to 27 %. Out of 465 DXAs, 371 (79.8 %) were classified as appropriately ordered per our pre-specified criteria. Of the 120 women with osteoporosis at the hip and/or spine based on T-score values of -2.5 or less, 14 DXAs (11.7 %) were classified as potentially inappropriate based on a FRAX-predicted MOF risk less than 9.3 % and lack of additional pre-specified risk factors.

CONCLUSION

We found that the USPSTF-recommended MOF risk threshold of 9.3 % for osteoporosis screening in women ages 50-64 years old has a low sensitivity to detect osteoporosis.

摘要

未标注

美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)建议,对于估计10年主要骨质疏松性骨折风险为9.3%或更高的65岁以下女性,考虑进行骨质疏松症筛查。我们发现,这个50 - 64岁女性骨质疏松症筛查的阈值在检测骨质疏松症方面敏感性较低。

引言

美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)建议,对于根据骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)估计主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)风险为9.3%或更高的50 - 64岁女性,考虑进行双能X线吸收法(DXA)检查。我们评估了9.3%的MOF风险阈值在检测骨质疏松症方面的表现,并根据USPSTF标准和其他风险因素,评估了在我们机构DXA检查指征是否合适。

方法

我们对50 - 64.5岁的女性进行了回顾性记录审查,以确定在美国预防服务工作组发布建议后的6个月内,在我们机构接受DXA检查的女性的临床因素和FRAX评分,并评估9.3%的MOF阈值检测密度测定骨质疏松症的敏感性和特异性。此外,我们使用USPSTF标准和其他几个风险因素,评估了在一个学术医疗中心的大型初级保健机构中,50至64岁女性中潜在不适当使用DXA的程度。

结果

分析包括465次DXA检查。FRAX计算的MOF风险≥9.3%检测骨质疏松症的总体敏感性和特异性分别为37%和74%。受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)显示曲线下面积为0.58。将FRAX风险阈值降低到5.5%,将使我们人群中检测骨质疏松症的敏感性从37%提高到80%,同时特异性从74%降低到27%。在465次DXA检查中,根据我们预先指定的标准,371次(79.8%)被分类为医嘱开具适当。在基于T值为-2.5或更低而诊断为髋部和/或脊柱骨质疏松症的120名女性中,14次DXA检查(11.7%)基于FRAX预测的MOF风险低于9.3%且缺乏额外预先指定的风险因素而被分类为潜在不适当。

结论

我们发现,美国预防服务工作组推荐的50 - 64岁女性骨质疏松症筛查的9.3%的MOF风险阈值在检测骨质疏松症方面敏感性较低。

相似文献

1
US Preventative Services Task Force FRAX threshold has a low sensitivity to detect osteoporosis in women ages 50-64 years.美国预防服务工作组的FRAX阈值在检测50至64岁女性骨质疏松症方面敏感性较低。
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Apr;26(4):1429-33. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3026-0. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
2
Comparison of Clinical Risk Tools for Predicting Osteoporosis in Women Ages 50-64.50-64岁女性骨质疏松症临床风险预测工具的比较
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):233-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150237.
3
A comparison of electronic and manual fracture risk assessment tools in screening elderly male US veterans at risk for osteoporosis.电子和手动骨折风险评估工具在筛查美国老年男性退伍军人骨质疏松风险中的比较。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Nov;28(11):3107-3111. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4172-3. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
4
Performance of FRAX in clinical practice according to sex and osteoporosis definitions: the Manitoba BMD registry.FRAX 在临床实践中的表现根据性别和骨质疏松症定义:马尼托巴省 BMD 登记处。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Mar;29(3):759-767. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4415-y. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
5
Targeted assessment of fracture risk in women at midlife.中年女性骨折风险的针对性评估。
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Jun;26(6):1705-12. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3046-9. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
6
Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.数字X线摄影测量法在骨质疏松性骨折研究中的应用:与双能X线吸收法及FRAX的比较
Bone. 2016 May;86:30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
7
Comparison of the Male Osteoporosis Risk Estimation Score (MORES) With FRAX in Identifying Men at Risk for Osteoporosis.男性骨质疏松症风险评估评分(MORES)与FRAX在识别骨质疏松症风险男性中的比较。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Jul;14(4):365-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1945.
8
Measurement of cortical porosity of the proximal femur improves identification of women with nonvertebral fragility fractures.测量股骨近端皮质骨孔隙率有助于更好地识别非椎体脆性骨折的女性患者。
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Aug;26(8):2137-46. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3118-x. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
9
Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women.应用世界卫生组织骨折风险评估工具预测绝经后女性进行双能X线吸收测定扫描的必要性。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;54(6):722-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.005.
10
Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)与日本中老年女性骨质疏松症的诊断:千叶骨调查
Endocr J. 2018 Feb 26;65(2):193-202. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0331. Epub 2017 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of Ten Osteoporosis Screening Tools in Rural Communities of Taiwan.验证十种骨质疏松症筛查工具在台湾农村社区的应用。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2024 Nov;115(5):507-515. doi: 10.1007/s00223-024-01273-6. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
2
Comparison of FRAX in postmenopausal Asian women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study.绝经后亚洲女性 2 型糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者 FRAX 比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Feb;48(2):300060519879591. doi: 10.1177/0300060519879591. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
3
Pharmacological Therapy of Osteoporosis: A Systematic Current Review of Literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women 50 to 64 years old: comparison of US Preventive Services Task Force strategy and two traditional strategies in the Women's Health Initiative.50至64岁绝经后女性的骨质疏松症筛查:美国预防服务工作组策略与女性健康倡议中的两种传统策略的比较
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Jul;29(7):1661-6. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2174.
2
ACOG Practice Bulletin N. 129. Osteoporosis.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第129号。骨质疏松症。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):718-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31826dc446.
3
Appropriate use of screening and diagnostic tests to foster high-value, cost-conscious care.
骨质疏松症的药物治疗:文献的系统当前综述
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Nov 7;8:803. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00803. eCollection 2017.
4
Osteoporosis: a discussion on the past 5 years.骨质疏松症:关于过去5年的讨论
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):265-274. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9410-y.
5
Time to Clinically Relevant Fracture Risk Scores in Postmenopausal Women.绝经后女性达到临床相关骨折风险评分的时间
Am J Med. 2017 Jul;130(7):862.e15-862.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
6
A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.基于FRAX的干预阈值系统评价:为国家骨质疏松症指南小组和国际骨质疏松症基金会编写的报告
Arch Osteoporos. 2016 Dec;11(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0278-z. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
恰当运用筛查和诊断检测,以促进具有高价值、成本意识的医疗照护。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 17;156(2):147-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-2-201201170-00011.
4
Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement.骨质疏松症筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Mar 1;154(5):356-64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00307. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
5
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations.美国临床内分泌医师协会绝经后骨质疏松症诊断与治疗临床实践医学指南:推荐意见执行摘要
Endocr Pract. 2010 Nov-Dec;16(6):1016-9. doi: 10.4158/ep.16.6.1016.
6
Screening for osteoporosis in the adult U.S. population: ACPM position statement on preventive practice.美国成年人群骨质疏松症筛查:美国预防医学学院关于预防实践的立场声明。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4):366-75. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.013.
7
Use of clinical prediction rules in detecting osteoporosis in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women.在基于人群的绝经后女性样本中使用临床预测规则检测骨质疏松症。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Mar 14;165(5):530-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.5.530.
8
Performance of risk indices for identifying low bone density in postmenopausal women.用于识别绝经后女性低骨密度的风险指数的性能
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Jul;77(7):629-37. doi: 10.4065/77.7.629.
9
Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.通过双能X线吸收法为女性进行骨密度测定的转诊决策规则评估。
JAMA. 2001 Jul 4;286(1):57-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.1.57.
10
Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry.骨质疏松症风险评估工具的开发与验证,以促进对女性进行骨密度测量的筛选。
CMAJ. 2000 May 2;162(9):1289-94.