Suppr超能文献

儿科患者粒子治疗的耐受性

Treatment tolerance of particle therapy in pediatric patients.

作者信息

Rieber Juliane G, Kessel Kerstin A, Witt Olaf, Behnisch Wolfgang, Kulozik Andreas E, Debus Jürgen, Combs Stephanie E

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2015 Jul;54(7):1049-55. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.998273. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Curative treatment of pediatric cancer not only focuses on long-term survival, but also on reducing treatment-related side effects. Advantages of particle therapy are mainly due to their physical ability of significantly reducing integral dose.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2012, we treated 83 pediatric patients (aged 21 and younger) at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center at University Hospital of Heidelberg (HIT). In total 56 patients (67%) received proton irradiation, while 25 (30%) patients were treated with carbon ions (C12). Two patients received both treatments (3%). Treatment toxicity was analyzed retrospectively and documented according to the CTCAE/RTOG classification. In a second step, treatment toxicity from ion therapy was analyzed in comparison to treatment toxicity during photon irradiation of a comparable historical group of 19 pediatric patients.

RESULTS

In all patients, particle therapy was tolerated well (median follow-up time 3.7 months), children (20 patients) with at least two follow-up visits showed a median follow-up time of 10.2 months. During the first two months patients mainly suffered from radiogenic skin reaction (63%), mucositis (30%), headache and dizziness (35%) as well as nausea and vomiting (13%). Severe toxicity reaction (grade II-IV) was only seen in patients who had intensive simultaneous chemotherapy or who had undergone several operations in the irradiated area before radiotherapy (18%). Treatment toxicity during ion therapy was comparable to treatment toxicity from photon irradiation of a historical group.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to conventional therapy, patients with particle therapy do not suffer from increased acute treatment-related toxicity during the first months. More experience with particle therapy will be needed during the next years to help to thoroughly evaluate the high potential of ion therapy.

摘要

未标注

儿童癌症的根治性治疗不仅关注长期生存,还注重减少与治疗相关的副作用。粒子治疗的优势主要源于其显著降低积分剂量的物理能力。

方法

2009年1月至2012年12月期间,我们在海德堡大学医院的海德堡离子治疗中心(HIT)治疗了83名儿科患者(年龄21岁及以下)。共有56名患者(67%)接受了质子照射,而25名(30%)患者接受了碳离子(C12)治疗。两名患者接受了两种治疗(3%)。对治疗毒性进行回顾性分析,并根据CTCAE/RTOG分类进行记录。第二步,将离子治疗的毒性与19名儿科患者的可比历史组光子照射期间的治疗毒性进行比较分析。

结果

所有患者对粒子治疗耐受性良好(中位随访时间3.7个月),至少有两次随访的儿童患者(20名)中位随访时间为10.2个月。在前两个月,患者主要出现放射性皮肤反应(63%)、粘膜炎(30%)、头痛和头晕(35%)以及恶心和呕吐(13%)。严重毒性反应(II-IV级)仅见于接受强化同步化疗或放疗前在照射区域接受过多次手术的患者(18%)。离子治疗期间的治疗毒性与历史组光子照射的治疗毒性相当。

结论

与传统治疗相比,接受粒子治疗的患者在最初几个月不会遭受与治疗相关的急性毒性增加。未来几年需要更多粒子治疗经验,以帮助全面评估离子治疗的巨大潜力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验