• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

捷克共和国首个经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)团队的经验。

Experiences of the first PICC team in the Czech Republic.

作者信息

Lisova Katerina, Paulinova Vendula, Zemanova Katerina, Hromadkova Jaroslava

机构信息

Head Nurse, medical intensive care unit, Faculty Hospital Prague Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2015;24(2):S4, S6, S10. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup2.S4.

DOI:10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup2.S4
PMID:25616129
Abstract

The first specialist nursing team placing peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in the Czech Republic was established in September 2012. During 2013 the team placed 167 PICCs and 162 midline catheters. In another 6 patients the insertion was not successful. PICCs were inserted mainly for oncology patients; while midline catheters were inserted for patients admitted to general wards. Average duration of catheter insertion was 91 days (range 7-285 days) for PICCs and 14 days (range 2-40 days) for midline catheters. During follow up of PICCs, catheter infection rate was 0.3/1000 days, vein thrombosis rate 0.4/1000 days, catheter occlusion 0.4/1000 days, and catheter displacement 0.33/1000 days. For midline catheters infection rate was 1.4/1000 days, vein thrombosis 5.2/1000 days, catheter occlusion 2.6/1000 days, and catheter displacement 2.2/1000 days. The authors hope that these results will motivate other hospitals in the Czech republic to establish PICC teams, as in other European countries.

摘要

2012年9月,捷克共和国首个专门负责放置外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)的护理团队成立。2013年,该团队放置了167根PICC和162根中线导管。另有6例患者的导管插入未成功。PICC主要为肿瘤患者插入;而中线导管则为普通病房收治的患者插入。PICC的平均置管时间为91天(范围7 - 285天),中线导管为14天(范围2 - 40天)。在PICC的随访期间,导管感染率为0.3/1000天,静脉血栓形成率为0.4/1000天,导管堵塞率为0.4/1000天,导管移位率为0.33/1000天。中线导管的感染率为1.4/1000天,静脉血栓形成率为5.2/1000天,导管堵塞率为2.6/1000天,导管移位率为2.2/1000天。作者希望这些结果能促使捷克共和国的其他医院像其他欧洲国家一样成立PICC团队。

相似文献

1
Experiences of the first PICC team in the Czech Republic.捷克共和国首个经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)团队的经验。
Br J Nurs. 2015;24(2):S4, S6, S10. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup2.S4.
2
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in cancer patients under chemotherapy: A prospective study on the incidence of complications and overall failures.化疗期间癌症患者的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC):并发症发生率及总体失败情况的前瞻性研究
J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;113(6):708-14. doi: 10.1002/jso.24220. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
3
A comparative study of peripherally-inserted and Broviac catheter complications in home parenteral nutrition patients.经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管与 Broviac 导管在家庭肠外营养患者中并发症的对比研究。
Clin Nutr. 2015 Feb;34(1):49-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
4
Peripherally inserted central catheters for long-term parenteral nutrition in infants with intestinal failure.经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管在肠衰竭婴儿中长期肠外营养中的应用。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 May;56(5):578-81. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182801e7b.
5
Distal Superficial Femoral Vein Cannulation for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in Infants with Cardiac Disease.在患有心脏病的婴儿中,经股浅静脉远心端置管用于外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管
Congenit Heart Dis. 2016 Dec;11(6):733-740. doi: 10.1111/chd.12398. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
6
Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites.上肢与下肢穿刺部位的新生儿经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管并发症
Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Jun;13(3):198-204. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e31827e1d01.
7
Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study.住院固体肿瘤患者中经外周插入中心静脉导管的使用模式和结局:一项多中心研究。
Cancer. 2022 Oct;128(20):3681-3690. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34410. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
8
Are cuffed peripherally inserted central catheters superior to uncuffed peripherally inserted central catheters? A retrospective review in a tertiary pediatric center.带囊外周静脉置入中心导管优于无囊外周静脉置入中心导管吗?三级儿科中心的回顾性研究。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Sep;24(9):1316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 3.
9
A prospective, randomized comparison of three different types of valved and non-valved peripherally inserted central catheters.三种不同类型的带瓣膜和不带瓣膜的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Vasc Access. 2014 Nov-Dec;15(6):519-23. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000280. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
10
Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with peripherally inserted central venous catheters used in hospitalized patients.住院患者使用外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管发生导管相关血流感染的风险。
Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):489-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.489.

引用本文的文献

1
The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with midline catheters compared with peripherally inserted central catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中线导管与外周静脉置入中心静脉导管相关的静脉血栓栓塞风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurs Open. 2022 May;9(3):1873-1882. doi: 10.1002/nop2.935. Epub 2021 May 15.
2
Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with midline catheters compared with peripherally inserted central catheters: A meta-analysis.中线导管与外周置入中心静脉导管相关血流感染风险的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Nurs Open. 2021 May;8(3):1292-1300. doi: 10.1002/nop2.746. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
3
Variation in prevalence and patterns of peripherally inserted central catheter use in adults hospitalized with pneumonia.
肺炎住院成人患者外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管使用率及模式的差异
J Hosp Med. 2016 Aug;11(8):568-75. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2586. Epub 2016 Apr 19.