Bin Jabr Adel, Lindblad Bengt, Dias Nuno, Resch Timothy, Malina Martin
Vascular Center, Skåne University Hospital-Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Vascular Center, Skåne University Hospital-Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):886-94.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.078. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
This study reports the early and midterm to long-term experience of chimney grafts (CGs) in urgent endovascular repair of complex lesions in the thoracic aorta.
Twenty-nine high-risk patients (20 men) who were unfit for open repair were treated using CG technique for ruptured (n = 14) or symptomatic (n = 15) aortic lesions engaging the aortic arch itself (n = 9), the descending aorta (n = 10), or the thoracoabdominal aorta (n = 10). Twenty-two patients (76%) were treated urgently (≤24 hours) and seven were semiurgent (≤3 days). Of 41 chimneys used, 24 were placed in supra-aortic branches and 17 in visceral branches. Median follow-up (interquartile range) for the entire cohort was 2 years (0.6-3.8 years), 2.5 years (1-4 years) for 30-day survivors, and 3.5 years (1.9-6.4 years) for those who were still alive.
Four patients (14%) died ≤30 days of cerebral infarction (n = 1), visceral ischemia secondary to the initial rupture (n = 1), multiple organ failure (n = 1), or heart failure (n = 1). There were 11 late deaths (38%); however, only two deaths were related to the CG technique. The primary and secondary technical success rates were 86% (25 of 29) and 97% (28 of 29), respectively. The secondary patency rate of CGs was 98%. Seventeen (68%) of the aortic lesions shrank significantly. Three patients (10%) had primary type I endoleak and another three (10%) had secondary type I endoleak. The endoleaks were managed with Onyx (ev3 Endovascular, Inc, Plymouth, Minn) or coil embolization (n = 2), restenting (n = 1), and conversion to open repair (n = 2). One secondary endoleak is still under observation after >20 months. All primary endoleaks and one secondary endoleak originated from CGs in the brachiocephalic trunk (4 of 6 [67%]).
The midterm to long-term results of the CG technique for urgent and complex lesions of the thoracic aorta in high-risk patients are promising, with low early mortality and long durability of the CGs. More patients with longer follow-up are still needed.
本研究报告烟囱式移植物(CGs)在胸主动脉复杂病变紧急血管腔内修复中的早期、中期至长期经验。
29例不适合开放修复的高危患者(20例男性)采用CG技术治疗,其中主动脉破裂(n = 14)或有症状(n = 15)的病变累及主动脉弓本身(n = 9)、降主动脉(n = 10)或胸腹主动脉(n = 10)。22例患者(76%)接受了紧急治疗(≤24小时),7例为半紧急治疗(≤3天)。在使用的41个烟囱式移植物中,24个置于主动脉弓上分支,17个置于内脏分支。整个队列的中位随访时间(四分位间距)为2年(0.6 - 3.8年),30天存活者为2.5年(1 - 4年),仍存活者为3.5年(1.9 - 6.4年)。
4例患者(14%)在≤30天内死亡,原因分别为脑梗死(n = 1)、初始破裂继发的内脏缺血(n = 1)、多器官功能衰竭(n = 1)或心力衰竭(n = 1)。有11例晚期死亡(38%);然而,只有2例死亡与CG技术有关。主要技术成功率和次要技术成功率分别为86%(29例中的25例)和97%(29例中的28例)。CGs的次要通畅率为98%。17例(68%)主动脉病变明显缩小。3例患者(10%)发生原发性I型内漏,另外3例(10%)发生继发性I型内漏。内漏采用Onyx(ev3 Endovascular公司,明尼苏达州普利茅斯)或弹簧圈栓塞治疗(n = 2)、再次支架置入(n = 1)以及转为开放修复(n = 2)。1例继发性内漏在20多个月后仍在观察中。所有原发性内漏和1例继发性内漏均起源于头臂干的CGs(6例中的4例[67%])。
对于高危患者胸主动脉紧急和复杂病变,CG技术的中期至长期结果令人鼓舞,早期死亡率低,CGs耐久性好。仍需要更多患者进行更长时间的随访。