Suppr超能文献

频谱响度总和:现行标准的不足之处

Spectral loudness summation: shortcomings of current standards.

作者信息

Schlittenlacher Josef, Ellermeier Wolfgang, Hashimoto Takeo

机构信息

Angewandte Kognitionspsychologie, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Alexanderstraße 10, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany

Seikei University, 3-3-1 Kichijoji-Kitamachi, Musashino-shi, 180-8633 Tokyo, Japan

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jan;137(1):EL26-31. doi: 10.1121/1.4902425.

Abstract

There are two competing national standards for the calculation of loudness of steady sounds, DIN 45631 and ANSI S3.4. Their different concepts of critical bands lead to different predictions for broadband sounds. As that discrepancy is neither constant nor linear but highly frequency-dependent, the present study investigates spectral loudness summation in three frequency regions, at various levels, and using two different methods. The results show that both algorithms overestimate loudness; however, DIN 45631 comes closer to the subjective evaluations and often falls within their interquartile range. The overestimation by the standards is particularly large in the frequency range from 2 to 5 kHz.

摘要

对于稳态声音响度的计算,存在两种相互竞争的国家标准,即DIN 45631和ANSI S3.4。它们对临界频带的不同概念导致对宽带声音的预测不同。由于这种差异既不是恒定的也不是线性的,而是高度依赖频率的,因此本研究在三个频率区域、不同声压级下使用两种不同方法研究了频谱响度总和。结果表明,两种算法都高估了响度;然而,DIN 45631更接近主观评估结果,并且常常落在其四分位间距范围内。在2至5千赫的频率范围内,这些标准的高估尤为明显。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验