Schlittenlacher Josef, Ellermeier Wolfgang, Hashimoto Takeo
Angewandte Kognitionspsychologie, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Alexanderstraße 10, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany
Seikei University, 3-3-1 Kichijoji-Kitamachi, Musashino-shi, 180-8633 Tokyo, Japan
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jan;137(1):EL26-31. doi: 10.1121/1.4902425.
There are two competing national standards for the calculation of loudness of steady sounds, DIN 45631 and ANSI S3.4. Their different concepts of critical bands lead to different predictions for broadband sounds. As that discrepancy is neither constant nor linear but highly frequency-dependent, the present study investigates spectral loudness summation in three frequency regions, at various levels, and using two different methods. The results show that both algorithms overestimate loudness; however, DIN 45631 comes closer to the subjective evaluations and often falls within their interquartile range. The overestimation by the standards is particularly large in the frequency range from 2 to 5 kHz.
对于稳态声音响度的计算,存在两种相互竞争的国家标准,即DIN 45631和ANSI S3.4。它们对临界频带的不同概念导致对宽带声音的预测不同。由于这种差异既不是恒定的也不是线性的,而是高度依赖频率的,因此本研究在三个频率区域、不同声压级下使用两种不同方法研究了频谱响度总和。结果表明,两种算法都高估了响度;然而,DIN 45631更接近主观评估结果,并且常常落在其四分位间距范围内。在2至5千赫的频率范围内,这些标准的高估尤为明显。