University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR72701, USA.
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR72701, USA.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Mar;36:13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
Although craving is a frequent phenomenon in addictive behaviors, and laboratory paradigms have robustly established that presentation of cues can elicit self-reported craving responses, extant work has not established whether cue exposure influences subsequent behavior. We systematically review extant literature assessing the effects of cue exposure to smoking, food, and alcohol cues on behavioral outcomes framed by three questions: (1) Is there value in distinguishing between the effects of cue exposure on behavior from the responses to cues (e.g., self-reported craving) predicting behavior?; (2) What are the effect of cues on behavior beyond lapse, such as broadly considering both target-syntonic (e.g., do cigarette cues predict smoking-related behaviors) and target-dystonic behaviors (e.g., do cigarette cues predict other outcomes besides smoking)?; (3) What are the lessons to be learned from examining cue exposure studies across smoking, food and alcohol domains? Evidence generally indicates an effect of cue exposure on both target-syntonic and target-dystonic behavior, and that self-report cue-reactivity predicts immediate target-syntonic outcomes. Effects of smoking, food and alcohol cues on behavior are compared to elucidate generalizations about the effects of cue exposure as well as methodological differences that may serve the study of craving in the future.
尽管在成瘾行为中,渴望是一种常见现象,且实验室范式已经强有力地证实了线索的呈现可以引起自我报告的渴望反应,但现有的研究尚未确定线索暴露是否会影响后续行为。我们系统地回顾了现有的文献,评估了吸烟、食物和酒精线索暴露对行为结果的影响,这些结果通过三个问题来体现:(1)区分线索暴露对行为的影响与预测行为的线索反应(例如,自我报告的渴望)是否有价值?(2)线索对行为的影响除了复发之外还有哪些,例如广泛考虑目标一致的行为(例如,吸烟线索是否预测与吸烟相关的行为)和目标不一致的行为(例如,吸烟线索是否预测除吸烟以外的其他结果)?(3)从检查吸烟、食物和酒精领域的线索暴露研究中可以吸取哪些经验教训?证据普遍表明,线索暴露对目标一致和目标不一致的行为都有影响,并且自我报告的线索反应可以预测即时的目标一致结果。比较吸烟、食物和酒精线索对行为的影响,以阐明线索暴露的影响以及可能为未来研究渴望提供帮助的方法学差异的概括。