• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移位型中1/3锁骨骨折的手术治疗:一项针对工伤补偿人群的前瞻性随机试验。

Surgical treatment of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized trial in a working compensation population.

作者信息

Melean Patricio A, Zuniga Adrian, Marsalli Michael, Fritis Nelson A, Cook Erik R, Zilleruelo Matías, Alvarez Cristian

机构信息

Shoulder Surgery Unit, Orthopedics Department, Hospital del Trabajador, Santiago, Chile.

Shoulder Surgery Unit, Orthopedics Department, Hospital del Trabajador, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Apr;24(4):587-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.041. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.041
PMID:25619692
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures resulted in shorter complete return to work periods with earlier consolidation documented on computed tomography (CT) scans in this prospective, randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The study randomized 76 consecutive patients with displaced fractures (2B1-2B2 according to Robinson) to conservative (C, n = 42) and surgical (S, n = 34) treatment with plates and screws. Bone union was documented with CT scans at 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Risk factors known to increase the risk of nonunion were similar between groups. Time until discharge for complete return to work was 3.7 ± 1.1 months for C and 2.9 ± 0.8 months for S (P = .003). On the CT scan at 6 weeks, 24.1% of the patients presented advanced bone union in S vs 5.3% in C (P = .05). At 12 weeks, 81% of the patients presented advanced bone union in S vs 16.7% in C (P = .005). At final follow-up, 4 nonunions were present in the C group that required surgery; in the S group, 4 patients underwent revision surgery for plate removal. At 6 and 12 months of follow-up, Constant scores were higher for the S group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment with ORIF of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures achieved good and excellent functional results, shorter time to complete return to work, earlier bone union, and fewer cases of nonunions in a working population under injury compensation.

摘要

背景

在这项前瞻性随机对照试验中,采用切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗移位的中1/3锁骨骨折,手术治疗组患者完全恢复工作的时间更短,且在计算机断层扫描(CT)上显示更早出现骨愈合。

方法

该研究将76例连续的移位骨折患者(根据罗宾逊分类为2B1 - 2B2型)随机分为保守治疗组(C组,n = 42)和手术治疗组(S组,n = 34),手术治疗采用钢板螺钉固定。在6周和12周时通过CT扫描记录骨愈合情况。

结果

已知增加骨不连风险的危险因素在两组之间相似。C组完全恢复工作直至出院的时间为3.7±1.1个月,S组为2.9±0.8个月(P = 0.003)。在6周时的CT扫描中,S组24.1%的患者出现早期骨愈合,而C组为5.3%(P = 0.05)。在12周时,S组81%的患者出现早期骨愈合,而C组为16.7%(P = 0.005)。在最终随访时,C组有4例骨不连患者需要手术治疗;S组有4例患者因取出钢板接受翻修手术。在随访6个月和12个月时,S组的Constant评分更高。

结论

对于接受工伤赔偿的工作人群,采用ORIF手术治疗移位的中1/3锁骨骨折可取得良好及优异的功能结果,缩短完全恢复工作的时间,更早实现骨愈合,且骨不连病例更少。

相似文献

1
Surgical treatment of displaced middle-third clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized trial in a working compensation population.移位型中1/3锁骨骨折的手术治疗:一项针对工伤补偿人群的前瞻性随机试验。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Apr;24(4):587-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.041. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
2
Open reduction and plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.切开复位钢板内固定与非手术治疗移位的锁骨中段骨折的多中心随机对照临床试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 4;95(17):1576-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00307.
3
Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical technique.非手术治疗与移位型锁骨中段骨折钢板固定的比较。手术技术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90 Suppl 2 Pt 1:1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01336.
4
Plate fixation compared with nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomized clinical trial.钢板固定与非手术治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折的随机临床试验。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Oct;100-B(10):1385-1391. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B10.BJJ-2017-1137.R3.
5
Sling compared with plate osteosynthesis for treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomized clinical trial.锁骨钩钢板与接骨板治疗移位性锁骨中段骨折的随机临床试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17):1546-53. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01999.
6
Anterior-inferior plate fixation of middle-third fractures and nonunions of the clavicle.锁骨中1/3骨折及骨不连的前下钢板固定术
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(10):680-6. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000249434.57571.29.
7
Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial.非手术治疗与移位型锁骨中段骨折钢板固定的比较:一项多中心随机临床试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):1-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00020.
8
Plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures: patient-reported outcomes and hardware-related complications.锁骨中段骨折的钢板固定:患者报告的结果及与内固定相关的并发症
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):739-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.029. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
Plate Fixation Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.钢板固定与非手术治疗移位型锁骨中段骨折:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 21;99(12):1051-1057. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01068.
10
Plate versus intramedullary fixation of two-part and multifragmentary displaced midshaft clavicle fractures - a long-term analysis.钢板与髓内固定治疗两部分及多段移位型锁骨中段骨折的长期分析
Injury. 2017 Nov;48 Suppl 5:S21-S26. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30734-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Harms Reporting in the RCTs Underpinning the AAOS Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clavicle Fractures.支持美国骨科学会锁骨骨折临床实践指南的随机对照试验中的危害报告。
HSS J. 2025 Feb;21(1):102-106. doi: 10.1177/15563316231222484. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
2
Minimal early functional gains after operative treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials including 1333 patients.锁骨中段骨折手术治疗后早期功能改善甚微:一项纳入1333例患者的10项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
JSES Int. 2024 Jan 26;8(3):400-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.12.011. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Functional Outcomes in Surgically Treated Clavicle Fractures: A Longitudinal Observational Study.
手术治疗锁骨骨折的功能结局:一项纵向观察研究。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):e48081. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48081. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Do multiple fractures affect risk of fixation failure after surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fracture? A retrospective cohort study.多发骨折是否会影响锁骨中段骨折手术后内固定失败的风险?一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jan;144(1):121-130. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05039-x. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
5
Surgical Fixation of Clavicle Shaft Fractures Using Superior Locking Plates With Lateral End Extension: A Retrospective Study.使用带外侧端延长的锁定加压接骨板手术固定锁骨骨干骨折:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2022 Oct 8;14(10):e30054. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30054. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Dual mini-fragment plate fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures is biomechanically equivalent to anatomic pre-contoured plating.双迷你片段钢板固定治疗锁骨中段骨折的生物力学效果与解剖预成型钢板相当。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1109-1116. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03268-1. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
7
Increase in surgical fixation of pediatric midshaft clavicle fractures since 2008.自 2008 年以来,小儿锁骨中段骨折的手术固定率增加。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 23;23(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04918-x.
8
Acute plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures is not associated with earlier return of normal shoulder function when union is achieved.当达到骨折愈合时,对移位的锁骨中段骨折进行切开复位钢板固定与正常肩部功能更早恢复无关。
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Jul;2(7):522-529. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0049.R1.
9
Sonographic bridging callus at six weeks following displaced midshaft clavicle fracture can accurately predict healing.移位性锁骨中段骨折六周后的超声骨痂可准确预测骨折愈合情况。
Bone Joint Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):113-121. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.102.BJR-2020-0341.R1.
10
An evaluation of treatment options for medial, midshaft, and distal clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.锁骨中内1/3、中段及远段骨折治疗方案的评估:一项系统评价与Meta分析
JSES Int. 2020 May 4;4(2):256-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.01.010. eCollection 2020 Jun.