• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全口服来迪派韦/索磷布韦方案治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒1型感染患者的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of all-oral ledipasvir/sofosbuvir regimens in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.

作者信息

Younossi Z M, Park H, Saab S, Ahmed A, Dieterich D, Gordon S C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Center for Liver Diseases, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Mar;41(6):544-63. doi: 10.1111/apt.13081. Epub 2015 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1111/apt.13081
PMID:25619871
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An all-oral, pegylated interferon (pegIFN)-free and ribavirin (RBV)-free single-tablet of ledipasvir (LDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) is now approved for the treatment of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1.

AIM

To estimate the health economic outcomes for LDV/SOF compared with current treatments in US patients infected with HCV genotype 1.

METHODS

A hybrid decision-tree and Markov state-transition model was developed. For a cohort of 10,000 patients, the model captured outcomes for several pairings of LDV/SOF with comparators, including long-term health outcomes, number need to treat, life-years gained, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYS) gained, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and costs per sustained virologic response (SVR). Patients with different levels of treatment experience and different cirrhosis stages were included.

RESULTS

LDV/SOF decreased the number of advanced liver disease cases by 0-93% compared with current regimens or no treatment in treatment-naïve patients. In treatment-experienced [pegIFN plus ribavirin (PR) or protease inhibitor (PI) + PR] patients, treatment with LDV/SOF decreased the incidence of advanced liver disease complications in most of the cases analysed, except SOF + SMV. For all patient sub-cohorts, LDV/SOF was associated with the lowest 1-year costs per SVR and, with regard to lifetime incremental costs per QALY gained, was either dominant or the most cost-effective treatment. Overall, treatment initiation at earlier stages of liver fibrosis resulted in improved health economic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

LDV/SOF is associated with more favourable short- and long-term health economic outcomes compared with current therapies for patients across all levels of treatment experience and cirrhosis stages.

摘要

背景

一种不含聚乙二醇化干扰素(pegIFN)和利巴韦林(RBV)的全口服单片剂,由来迪派韦(LDV)和索磷布韦(SOF)组成,现已获批用于治疗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)基因1型感染患者。

目的

评估LDV/SOF与美国HCV基因1型感染患者目前治疗方案相比的健康经济结果。

方法

建立了一个混合决策树和马尔可夫状态转移模型。对于10,000名患者的队列,该模型捕捉了LDV/SOF与对照方案几种组合的结果,包括长期健康结果、需治疗人数、获得的生命年数、获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)、增量成本效益比以及每例持续病毒学应答(SVR)的成本。纳入了不同治疗经验水平和不同肝硬化阶段的患者。

结果

与初治患者的现有方案或不治疗相比,LDV/SOF可使晚期肝病病例数减少0 - 93%。在经治患者[聚乙二醇化干扰素联合利巴韦林(PR)或蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)+ PR]中,除SOF + SMV外,在大多数分析病例中,LDV/SOF治疗可降低晚期肝病并发症的发生率。对于所有患者亚队列,LDV/SOF每例SVR的1年成本最低,就每获得一个QALY的终生增量成本而言,要么占主导地位,要么是最具成本效益的治疗方案。总体而言,在肝纤维化早期开始治疗可改善健康经济结果。

结论

与目前针对所有治疗经验水平和肝硬化阶段患者的疗法相比,LDV/SOF具有更有利的短期和长期健康经济结果。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of all-oral ledipasvir/sofosbuvir regimens in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.全口服来迪派韦/索磷布韦方案治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒1型感染患者的成本效益
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Mar;41(6):544-63. doi: 10.1111/apt.13081. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Modelling of Sofosbuvir-Containing Regimens for Chronic Genotype 5 Hepatitis C Virus Infection in South Africa.南非含索磷布韦方案治疗慢性5型丙型肝炎病毒感染的成本效益建模
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Apr;34(4):403-17. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0356-x.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C: Treatment of patients with absence or mild fibrosis compared to patients with advanced fibrosis.来迪派韦/索磷布韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本效益分析:无纤维化或轻度纤维化患者与重度纤维化患者的治疗比较。
J Viral Hepat. 2017 Sep;24(9):750-758. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12704. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sofosbuvir plus peginterferon/ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.索磷布韦联合聚乙二醇干扰素/利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染的成本效果分析。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Sep;40(6):657-75. doi: 10.1111/apt.12871. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of New HCV Treatments in Egyptian Cirrhotic and Non-Cirrhotic Patients: A Societal Perspective.埃及肝硬化和非肝硬化患者新型丙型肝炎病毒治疗的成本效益分析:社会视角
Value Health Reg Issues. 2017 Sep;13:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
6
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir for Treating Chronic Hepatitis C: A NICE Single Technology Appraisal-An Evidence Review Group Perspective.来迪派韦-索非布韦治疗慢性丙型肝炎:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所单一技术评估——证据审查小组观点
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Aug;34(8):741-50. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0387-y.
7
Cost-utility analysis of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C in Japan.在日本,ledipasvir/sofosbuvir治疗基因1型慢性丙型肝炎的成本效用分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jan;33(1):11-21. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1222513. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
8
Real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir hepatitis C treatment in a single centre in Germany.德国单一中心研究索磷布韦/维帕他韦和来迪派韦/索磷布韦治疗丙型肝炎的真实世界疗效和安全性。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214795. eCollection 2019.
9
Cost analysis of sofosbuvir/ribavirin versus sofosbuvir/simeprevir for genotype 1 hepatitis C virus in interferon-ineligible/intolerant individuals.索磷布韦/利巴韦林与索磷布韦/西美瑞韦治疗无干扰素适应证/不耐受的 1 型丙型肝炎病毒的成本分析。
Hepatology. 2014 Jul;60(1):37-45. doi: 10.1002/hep.27151. Epub 2014 May 14.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir with and without Ribavirin in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection: a meta-analysis.在慢性丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染患者中使用雷迪帕韦/索磷布韦联合或不联合利巴韦林的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;55:56-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.12.023. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Extrahepatic Cancer Risk in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Infection Treated with Direct-Acting Antivirals.接受直接抗病毒药物治疗的丙型肝炎病毒感染患者的肝外癌症风险
Microorganisms. 2024 Sep 22;12(9):1926. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091926.
2
Quercetin: A Functional Food-Flavonoid Incredibly Attenuates Emerging and Re-Emerging Viral Infections through Immunomodulatory Actions.槲皮素:一种功能性食品类黄酮,通过免疫调节作用,显著减轻新发和再发病毒感染。
Molecules. 2023 Jan 17;28(3):938. doi: 10.3390/molecules28030938.
3
Economic Impact of Universal Hepatitis C Virus Testing for Middle-Aged Adults Who Inject Drugs.
为中年吸毒者进行普遍的丙型肝炎病毒检测的经济影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Jan;64(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.08.016. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
Association between sustained virological response and clinical outcomes in patients with hepatitis C infection and hepatocellular carcinoma.慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染合并肝细胞癌患者持续病毒学应答与临床结局的关系。
Cancer. 2022 Oct 1;128(19):3470-3478. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34378. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
5
Economic evaluation of pan-genotypic generic direct-acting antiviral regimens for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Iran: a cost-effectiveness study.伊朗泛基因型通用直接作用抗病毒治疗方案治疗慢性丙型肝炎的经济性评价:成本效果研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 8;12(6):e058757. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058757.
6
Improving access to the treatment of hepatitis C in low- and middle-income countries: evaluation of a patient assistance programme.改善中低收入国家丙型肝炎治疗的可及性:患者援助计划评估。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Aug;43(4):958-968. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01202-1. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
7
On the path towards universal coverage of hepatitis C treatment among people receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) in Norway: a prospective cohort study from 2013 to 2017.在挪威接受阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)的人群中实现丙型肝炎治疗全面覆盖的道路上:一项2013年至2017年的前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e036355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036355.
8
Differences in healthcare expenditure estimates according to statistical approach: A nationwide claims database study on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.根据统计方法的差异估计医疗支出:一项基于全国索赔数据库的肝细胞癌患者研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237316. eCollection 2020.
9
Healthcare Expenditures for the Treatment of Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus in Japan.日本丙型肝炎病毒感染者治疗的医疗支出。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Mar;38(3):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00861-x.
10
The price of shortening anti-hepatitis C virus therapy: Is this truly cost saving?缩短丙型肝炎病毒治疗疗程的代价:这真的能节省成本吗?
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2015 Dec 9;6(5):126-128. doi: 10.1002/cld.514. eCollection 2015 Nov.