Buti M, Domínguez-Hernández R, Oyagüez I, Casado M A, Esteban R
Liver Unit, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron and CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain.
Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain.
J Viral Hepat. 2017 Sep;24(9):750-758. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12704. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1 (GT1) in the absence or mild fibrosis (F0-F1) versus advanced fibrosis (F2-F4), from the perspective of the Spanish Health System. A Markov model was developed to simulate disease progression, estimating costs and outcomes [life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY)] derived from starting with LDV/SOF in patients with F0-F1 compared with F2-F4. Therapy duration was 8 weeks in noncirrhotic patients with viral load <6 million IU/mL and 12 weeks in the remaining patients. Sustained virologic response rates were obtained from real-world cohort studies. Transition probabilities, utilities and direct costs were obtained from the literature. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were performed. LDV/SOF in F0-F1 patients was a dominant strategy, being more effective (19.85 LYG and 19.80 QALY) than beginning treatment in F2-F4 patients (18.63 LYG and 16.25 QALY), generating savings of €9228 per patient (€3661 due to disease management and monitoring). In a cohort of 1000 patients, LDV/SOF in F0-F1 patients decreased the number of cases of decompensated cirrhosis (93%), hepatocellular carcinoma (97%) and liver-related deaths (95%) and prevented 6 liver transplants compared to initiating LDV/SOF in F2-F4 patients. In CHC treatment-naïve GT1 patients, starting treatment with LDV/SOF in patients with F0-F1 compared to those with F2-F4 increases effectiveness by 1.22 LYG and 3.55 QALY gained and reduces disease burden and it is associated with cost savings.
从西班牙卫生系统的角度,评估在未接受过治疗的慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)基因1型(GT1)且无纤维化或轻度纤维化(F0 - F1)与重度纤维化(F2 - F4)患者中,使用来迪派韦/索磷布韦(LDV/SOF)的成本效益。建立了一个马尔可夫模型来模拟疾病进展,估计从F0 - F1患者与F2 - F4患者开始使用LDV/SOF所产生的成本和结果[获得的生命年数(LYG)和质量调整生命年数(QALY)]。病毒载量<600万IU/mL的非肝硬化患者治疗疗程为8周,其余患者为12周。持续病毒学应答率来自真实世界队列研究。转移概率、效用和直接成本来自文献。对成本和结果应用3%的年度贴现率。进行了敏感性分析。F0 - F1患者使用LDV/SOF是一种优势策略,比F2 - F4患者开始治疗更有效(19.85 LYG和19.80 QALY),每位患者节省9228欧元(由于疾病管理和监测节省3661欧元)。在1000名患者的队列中,与F2 - F4患者开始使用LDV/SOF相比,F0 - F1患者使用LDV/SOF可减少失代偿性肝硬化病例数(93%)、肝细胞癌病例数(97%)和肝脏相关死亡数(95%),并避免6例肝移植。在未接受过CHC治疗的GT1患者中,F