• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在左心室射血分数保留的低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,经导管主动脉瓣植入术使用球囊扩张式瓣膜与自膨式瓣膜的比较。

Comparison of balloon-expandable versus self-expandable valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

作者信息

Covolo Elisa, Saia Francesco, Napodano Massimo, Frigo Anna Chiara, Agostoni Pierfrancesco, Mojoli Marco, Fraccaro Chiara, Ciuca Cristina, Presbitero Patrizia, Moretti Claudio, D'Ascenzo Fabrizio, Tarantini Giuseppe

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Department of Cardiology, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;115(6):810-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.042. Epub 2015 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.042
PMID:25620039
Abstract

A relevant proportion of patients, classified as severe aortic stenosis on the basis of valve area ≤1 cm(2), have a mean transvalvular gradient ≤40 mm Hg, despite a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LGSAS). We assessed the clinical and hemodynamic impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with symptomatic LGSAS at high risk for surgery or inoperable, according to the type of percutaneous valve implanted. Ninety-five patients received an Edwards SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) and 51 received a Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota). The hemodynamic performance of the 2 valves was similar in term of final transvalvular gradients (10 mm Hg, p = 0.069). Early mortality rate was 7% and was not different between the 2 valves (p = 0.73). During follow-up, cardiovascular mortality rate was similar between groups, and valve type was not a predictor of outcome (p = 0.72). Estimated survival by Kaplan-Meier at 2 years was 70%. At multivariate analysis, life-threatening or major bleeding, postprocedural aortic insufficiency, and acute kidney injury were the major predictors of an adverse outcome. In patients with LGSAS treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation, the use of balloon-expandable versus self-expandable valves resulted in similar hemodynamic, early, and long-term clinical outcomes.

摘要

相当一部分患者,基于瓣膜面积≤1平方厘米被归类为重度主动脉瓣狭窄,尽管左心室射血分数保留,但平均跨瓣压差≤40毫米汞柱(低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄,LGSAS)。我们根据植入的经皮瓣膜类型,评估了经导管主动脉瓣植入术对有症状的、手术高风险或无法手术的LGSAS患者的临床和血流动力学影响。95例患者接受了爱德华SAPIEN瓣膜(爱德华生命科学公司,加利福尼亚州欧文),51例患者接受了美敦力CoreValve瓣膜(美敦力公司,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)。两种瓣膜的最终跨瓣压差方面的血流动力学表现相似(10毫米汞柱,p = 0.069)。早期死亡率为7%,两种瓣膜之间无差异(p = 0.73)。随访期间,两组间心血管死亡率相似,瓣膜类型不是预后的预测因素(p = 0.72)。根据Kaplan-Meier法估计的2年生存率为70%。多因素分析显示,危及生命或大出血、术后主动脉瓣关闭不全和急性肾损伤是不良预后的主要预测因素。在接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗的LGSAS患者中,使用球囊扩张式瓣膜与自膨胀式瓣膜导致相似的血流动力学、早期和长期临床结果。

相似文献

1
Comparison of balloon-expandable versus self-expandable valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.在左心室射血分数保留的低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,经导管主动脉瓣植入术使用球囊扩张式瓣膜与自膨式瓣膜的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;115(6):810-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.042. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
2
Surgical sutureless and transcatheter aortic valves: hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes in propensity score-matched high-risk populations with severe aortic stenosis.外科无缝合和经导管主动脉瓣:严重主动脉瓣狭窄高危人群中倾向评分匹配的血流动力学性能和临床结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 27;8(5):670-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.029.
3
1-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expandable Valves: Results From the CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮球囊扩张式与自膨式主动脉瓣置换术后 1 年的结果:来自 CHOICE 随机临床试验的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 18;66(7):791-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.026.
4
Echocardiographic outcomes of self-expandable CoreValve versus balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN XT valves: the comparison of two bioprosthesis implanted in a single centre.自膨胀式CoreValve瓣膜与球囊扩张式爱德华兹SAPIEN XT瓣膜的超声心动图结果:单中心植入的两种生物假体的比较
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Sep;32(9):1371-1378. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0924-y. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis using the Edwards Sapien balloon-expandable bioprosthesis: a single centre study with immediate and medium-term outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者使用 Edwards Sapien 球囊扩张生物瓣:单中心即时和中期结果研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar 1;75(4):475-85. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22291.
6
Comparison of hemodynamic performance of self-expandable CoreValve versus balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN aortic valves inserted by catheter for aortic stenosis.经导管置入自膨式 CoreValve 与球囊扩张式 Edwards SAPIEN 主动脉瓣治疗主动脉瓣狭窄的血流动力学性能比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Apr 1;111(7):1026-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.063. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
7
Early clinical outcome of aortic transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in the Nordic countries.北欧国家经导管主动脉瓣中瓣植入术的早期临床结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1047-54; discussion 1054. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.045. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
8
Comprehensive Echocardiographic Assessment of Normal Transcatheter Valve Function.经导管正常瓣膜功能的综合超声心动图评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
9
Transcatheter Replacement of Failed Bioprosthetic Valves: Large Multicenter Assessment of the Effect of Implantation Depth on Hemodynamics After Aortic Valve-in-Valve.经导管置换失败的生物瓣膜:主动脉瓣中瓣植入深度对血流动力学影响的大型多中心评估
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003651.
10
Prognostic value of aortic root calcification volume on clinical outcomes after transcatheter balloon-expandable aortic valve implantation.经导管球囊扩张式主动脉瓣植入术后主动脉根部钙化体积对临床结局的预后价值。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov 15;86(6):1105-13. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25986. Epub 2015 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Bedside risk score for prediction of acute kidney injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后急性肾损伤预测的床边风险评分
Open Heart. 2018 May 30;5(1):e000777. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000777. eCollection 2018.