Kuckertz Jennie M, Amir Nader
Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, 6386 Alvarado Ct., Suite 301, San Diego, CA, 92120, USA,
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Feb;17(2):9. doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0545-x.
Attention bias modification (ABM) was introduced over a decade ago as a computerized method of manipulating attentional bias and has been followed by intense interest in applying ABM for clinical purposes. While meta-analyses support ABM as a method of modifying attentional biases and reducing anxiety symptoms, there have been notable discrepancies in findings published within the last several years. In this review, we comment on recent research that may help explain some of the inconsistencies across ABM studies. More relevant to the future of ABM research, we highlight areas in which continuing research is needed. We suggest that ABM appears to be a promising treatment for anxiety disorders, but relative to other interventions, ABM is in its infancy. Thus, research is needed in order to improve ABM as a clinical treatment and advance the psychological science of ABM.
注意力偏差修正(ABM)在十多年前被引入,作为一种操纵注意力偏差的计算机化方法,随后人们对将ABM应用于临床目的产生了浓厚兴趣。虽然荟萃分析支持ABM作为一种修正注意力偏差和减轻焦虑症状的方法,但在过去几年发表的研究结果中存在显著差异。在本综述中,我们对近期的研究进行评论,这些研究可能有助于解释ABM研究之间的一些不一致之处。与ABM研究的未来更相关的是,我们强调了需要持续研究的领域。我们认为ABM似乎是一种治疗焦虑症的有前景的方法,但相对于其他干预措施,ABM仍处于起步阶段。因此,需要进行研究以改进ABM作为一种临床治疗方法,并推动ABM的心理学科学发展。