Incani Michela, Sentinelli Federica, Perra Laura, Pani Maria Grazia, Porcu Marta, Lenzi Andrea, Cavallo Maria Gisella, Cossu Efisio, Leonetti Frida, Baroni Marco Giorgio
Department of Medical Sciences, Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Cagliari Cagliari, Italy.
Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy.
J Diabetes Investig. 2015 Jan;6(1):44-50. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12241. Epub 2014 May 16.
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: Measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has been recommended for the diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. However, epidemiological studies have shown significant discordance between HbA1c and glucose-based tests. Of the factors that could influence agreement between HbA1c and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), bodyweight has not been fully evaluated. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the impact of HbA1c criteria to diagnose diabetes and prediabetes compared with OGTT, and to examine HbA1c in relation to body mass index.
Two cohorts were studied, one from an obesity clinic (n = 592) and one from subjects undergoing screening for diabetes (n = 462). All underwent OGTT and HbA1c measurement.
In the obese cohort, HbA1c ≥6.5% (≥48 mmol/mol) showed a sensitivity of 69.3% for diabetes, whereas HbA1c 5.7-6.4% (39-46 mmol/mol) did not identify prediabetes well (sensitivity 39.1%). In the diabetes screening cohort, HbA1c had low sensitivities for both diabetes (39.2%) and prediabetes (53.3%). When participants were stratified according to body mass index class I-III, HbA1c agreement with the OGTT for diabetes was much higher (80%, P < 0.005) in class I obesity compared with class II-III obesity; whereas for prediabetes, HbA1c had a low sensitivity in all obesity classes.
The agreement between HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and 2-h glucose post-OGTT for the diagnosis of prediabetes was poor in our Italian population; whereas HbA1c ≥6.5% showed a relatively good agreement with OGTT for the diagnosis of diabetes. For the first time, we have shown that obesity class influences the diagnostic performance of HbA1c.
目的/引言:糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测已被推荐用于糖尿病和糖尿病前期的诊断。然而,流行病学研究表明HbA1c与基于血糖的检测之间存在显著差异。在可能影响HbA1c与口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)一致性的因素中,体重尚未得到充分评估。本研究的目的是评估与OGTT相比,HbA1c标准对糖尿病和糖尿病前期诊断的影响,并研究HbA1c与体重指数的关系。
研究了两个队列,一个来自肥胖诊所(n = 592),另一个来自接受糖尿病筛查的受试者(n = 462)。所有人都接受了OGTT和HbA1c检测。
在肥胖队列中,HbA1c≥6.5%(≥48 mmol/mol)对糖尿病的敏感性为69.3%,而HbA1c 5.7 - 6.4%(39 - 46 mmol/mol)对糖尿病前期的诊断效果不佳(敏感性为39.1%)。在糖尿病筛查队列中,HbA1c对糖尿病(39.2%)和糖尿病前期(53.3%)的敏感性都较低。当参与者根据体重指数I - III级分层时,与II - III级肥胖相比,I级肥胖中HbA1c与OGTT对糖尿病的一致性要高得多(80%,P < 0.005);而对于糖尿病前期,HbA1c在所有肥胖级别中的敏感性都较低。
在我们的意大利人群中,HbA1c、空腹血糖和OGTT后2小时血糖在糖尿病前期诊断方面的一致性较差;而HbA1c≥6.5%在糖尿病诊断方面与OGTT显示出相对较好的一致性。我们首次表明肥胖级别会影响HbA1c的诊断性能。