Suppr超能文献

基于空腹血糖、餐后血糖和糖化血红蛋白标准诊断的糖尿病前期个体的心脏代谢风险特征和颈动脉粥样硬化。

Cardiometabolic risk profiles and carotid atherosclerosis in individuals with prediabetes identified by fasting glucose, postchallenge glucose, and hemoglobin A1c criteria.

机构信息

Department of InternalMedicine, University of Rome-Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2012 May;35(5):1144-9. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2032. Epub 2012 Mar 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated whether cardiometabolic risk profiles differ for subjects identified as having prediabetes by A1C, fasting glucose (FPG), or 2-h postchallenge glucose (2-PG) criteria.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Atherosclerosis risk factors, oral glucose tolerance test, and ultrasound measurement of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) were analyzed in 780 nondiabetic individuals.

RESULTS

Poor agreement existed for A1C and FPG criteria for identification of subjects with prediabetes (κ coefficient = 0.332). No differences in cardiometabolic risk profiles were observed among the three groups of individuals with prediabetes by A1C only, FPG only, and both A1C and FPG. Poor agreement also existed for A1C and 2-PG criteria for identification of individuals with prediabetes (κ coefficient = 0.299). No significant differences in cardiometabolic risk factors were observed between IGT-only and individuals with prediabetes by A1C and 2-PG. Compared with subjects with prediabetes identified by A1C only, IGT-only individuals exhibited a worse cardiometabolic risk profile, with significantly higher systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, 2-h postchallenge insulin, triglycerides, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and carotid IMT, and lower HDL cholesterol levels and insulin sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that considerable discordance between A1C, FPG, and 2-PG exists for the identification of individuals with prediabetes and that the cardiometabolic risk profile of these individuals varies by metabolic parameter, with 2-PG showing the stronger association with cardiometabolic risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis than FPG or A1C.

摘要

目的

我们评估了通过 A1C、空腹血糖(FPG)或 2 小时餐后血糖(2-PG)标准确定为糖尿病前期的个体,其心血管代谢风险特征是否存在差异。

研究设计和方法

对 780 名非糖尿病个体进行了动脉粥样硬化风险因素、口服葡萄糖耐量试验和颈动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)超声测量。

结果

A1C 和 FPG 标准对糖尿病前期个体的识别存在较差的一致性(κ 系数=0.332)。仅通过 A1C、仅通过 FPG 或 A1C 和 FPG 确定的三组糖尿病前期个体的心血管代谢风险特征无差异。A1C 和 2-PG 标准对糖尿病前期个体的识别也存在较差的一致性(κ 系数=0.299)。IGT 个体与仅通过 A1C 和 2-PG 确定的糖尿病前期个体之间,在心血管代谢风险因素方面无显著差异。与仅通过 A1C 确定的糖尿病前期个体相比,IGT 个体的心血管代谢风险特征更差,表现为收缩压、脉压、2 小时餐后胰岛素、甘油三酯、高敏 C 反应蛋白和颈动脉 IMT 更高,HDL 胆固醇水平和胰岛素敏感性更低。

结论

这些结果表明,A1C、FPG 和 2-PG 之间在识别糖尿病前期个体方面存在相当大的差异,并且这些个体的心血管代谢风险特征因代谢参数而异,2-PG 与心血管代谢危险因素和亚临床动脉粥样硬化的相关性强于 FPG 或 A1C。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2011 年》
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc11-S011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验