Dubois David, Rucker Derek D, Galinsky Adam D
Marketing Department, INSEAD.
Marketing Department, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar;108(3):436-49. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000008. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
Are the rich more unethical than the poor? To answer this question, the current research introduces a key conceptual distinction between selfish and unethical behavior. Based on this distinction, the current article offers 2 novel findings that illuminate the relationship between social class and unethical behavior. First, the effects of social class on unethical behavior are not invariant; rather, the effects of social class are moderated by whether unethical behavior benefits the self or others. Replicating past work, social class positively predicted unethical behavior; however, this relationship was only observed when that behavior was self-beneficial. When unethical behavior was performed to benefit others, social class negatively predicted unethical behavior; lower class individuals were more likely than upper class individuals to engage in unethical behavior. Overall, social class predicts people's tendency to behave selfishly, rather than predicting unethical behavior per se. Second, individuals' sense of power drove the effects of social class on unethical behavior. Evidence for this relationship was provided in three forms. First, income, but not education level, predicted unethical behavior. Second, feelings of power mediated the effect of social class on unethical behavior, but feelings of status did not. Third, two distinct manipulations of power produced the same moderation by self-versus-other beneficiary as was found with social class. The current theoretical framework and data both synthesize and help to explain a range of findings in the social class and power literatures.
富人比穷人更不道德吗?为了回答这个问题,当前的研究引入了自私行为和不道德行为之间的一个关键概念区分。基于这一区分,本文给出了两项新颖的研究发现,阐明了社会阶层与不道德行为之间的关系。首先,社会阶层对不道德行为的影响并非一成不变;相反,社会阶层的影响会受到不道德行为是利己还是利他的调节。重复以往的研究,社会阶层正向预测不道德行为;然而,这种关系仅在行为利己时才被观察到。当不道德行为是为了使他人受益时,社会阶层负向预测不道德行为;下层个体比上层个体更有可能做出不道德行为。总体而言,社会阶层预测的是人们自私行事的倾向,而非不道德行为本身。其次,个体的权力感驱动了社会阶层对不道德行为的影响。这一关系的证据以三种形式呈现。第一,收入而非教育水平预测了不道德行为。第二,权力感介导了社会阶层对不道德行为的影响,但地位感没有。第三,两种不同的权力操纵产生了与社会阶层相同的自我与他人受益的调节效应。当前的理论框架和数据既综合又有助于解释社会阶层和权力文献中的一系列研究发现。