• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不信任是不平等的一种形式。

Distrust as a form of inequality.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 105 The Green, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.

Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Delaware, 18 Amstel Ave., Newark, DE, 19716, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):9901. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36948-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-36948-x
PMID:37337115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10279663/
Abstract

Navigating social hierarchies is a ubiquitous aspect of human life. Social status shapes our thoughts, feelings, and actions toward others in various ways. However, it remains unclear how trust is conferred within hierarchies and how status-related cues are used when resources are on the line. This research fills this knowledge gap by examining how ascribed, consensus-based status appearance, and perceived status appearance impact investment decisions for high- and low-status partners during a Trust Game. In a series of pre-registered experiments, we examined the degree to which participants trusted unfamiliar others with financial investments when the only available information about that person was their socioeconomic status (SES). In Study 1, SES was ascribed. Studies 2 and 3 conveyed SES with visual antecedents (clothing). Across all three experiments, participants trusted high SES partners more than low SES partners. In addition, subjective perceptions of status based on visual cues were a stronger predictor of trust than consensus-based status judgments. This work highlights a high status-trust bias for decisions where an individual's money is on the line. In addition, high-status trust bias may occur simply because of an individual's subjective assumptions about another's rank.

摘要

在人类生活中,驾驭社会等级是普遍存在的现象。社会地位以各种方式塑造着我们对他人的想法、感受和行为。然而,在涉及资源时,人们对于信任如何在等级制度中产生以及如何利用与地位相关的线索仍不清楚。本研究通过考察在信任博弈中,当唯一可用的关于他人的信息是其社会经济地位 (SES) 时,赋予的、基于共识的地位表现和感知的地位表现如何影响高地位和低地位伙伴的投资决策,填补了这一知识空白。在一系列预先注册的实验中,我们研究了当参与者对不熟悉的他人进行财务投资时,他们对其社会经济地位(SES)的信任程度。在研究 1 中,SES 是赋予的。研究 2 和 3 通过视觉先行线索(衣着)传达 SES。在所有三个实验中,参与者都比低 SES 伙伴更信任高 SES 伙伴。此外,基于视觉线索的主观地位感知是信任的一个更强预测因素,而不是基于共识的地位判断。这项工作突出了在个人的金钱处于风险之中的决策中存在高度的地位信任偏见。此外,高地位信任偏见可能仅仅是因为个人对他人等级的主观假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/a75cdd53a3f0/41598_2023_36948_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/7fb940a07a1a/41598_2023_36948_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/fbaf4980a27a/41598_2023_36948_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/9ad89936cb54/41598_2023_36948_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/1871f8e1706a/41598_2023_36948_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/a75cdd53a3f0/41598_2023_36948_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/7fb940a07a1a/41598_2023_36948_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/fbaf4980a27a/41598_2023_36948_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/9ad89936cb54/41598_2023_36948_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/1871f8e1706a/41598_2023_36948_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bc9/10279663/a75cdd53a3f0/41598_2023_36948_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Distrust as a form of inequality.不信任是不平等的一种形式。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):9901. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36948-x.
2
Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.敌友之间:社会决策中内隐可信度判断的影响
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):796-803. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
3
Are Rich People Perceived as More Trustworthy? Perceived Socioeconomic Status Modulates Judgments of Trustworthiness and Trust Behavior Based on Facial Appearance.富人是否被认为更值得信赖?感知到的社会经济地位会基于面部外观调节对可信度和信任行为的判断。
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 10;9:512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00512. eCollection 2018.
4
Group membership moderates the process of making trust judgments based on facial cues.群体归属会影响基于面部线索做出信任判断的过程。
J Soc Psychol. 2022 Sep 3;162(5):595-606. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1939249. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
5
Subjective economic inequality is associated with lower well-being through more upward comparison and lower trust.主观经济不平等通过更多的向上比较和更低的信任与幸福感降低有关。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024 Feb;16(1):25-41. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12467. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
6
Similarities and differences in Chinese and Caucasian adults' use of facial cues for trustworthiness judgments.中文和高加索成年人在使用面部线索判断可信度方面的相似性和差异。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034859. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
When distrust frees your mind: the stereotype-reducing effects of distrust.当不信任解放你的思想时:不信任的刻板印象减少效应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Oct;105(4):567-84. doi: 10.1037/a0033170. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
9
Children's dynamic use of face- and behavior-based cues in an economic trust game.儿童在经济信任博弈中对基于面部和行为线索的动态运用。
Dev Psychol. 2022 Dec;58(12):2275-2286. doi: 10.1037/dev0001438. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
10
The Influence of Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Life Satisfaction: The Chain Mediating Role of Social Equity and Social Trust.主观社会经济地位对生活满意度的影响:社会公平和社会信任的链式中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315652.

本文引用的文献

1
Individuals of high socioeconomic status are altruistic in sharing money but egoistic in sharing time.高社会经济地位的个体在分享金钱时是利他的,但在分享时间时是利己的。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 27;12(1):10831. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14800-y.
2
Leadership, gender, and colorism: Children in India use social category information to guide leadership cognition.领导力、性别与肤色歧视:印度儿童利用社会类别信息来引导领导力认知。
Dev Sci. 2022 May;25(3):e13212. doi: 10.1111/desc.13212. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
3
Expectations of trustworthiness in cross-status interactions.
跨地位互动中的可信赖性预期。
Soc Sci Res. 2021 Sep;99:102596. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102596. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
4
Anticipation of future cooperation eliminates minimal ingroup bias in children and adults.对未来合作的预期消除了儿童和成人最小内群体偏见。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Oct;150(10):2036-2056. doi: 10.1037/xge0000899. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
5
Social sampling: Children track social choices to reason about status hierarchies.社会抽样:儿童跟踪社会选择以推理社会等级制度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Aug;150(8):1673-1687. doi: 10.1037/xge0001008. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
Regional and network neural activity reflect men's preference for greater socioeconomic status during impression formation.区域和网络神经活动反映了男性在印象形成过程中对更高社会经济地位的偏好。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 20;10(1):20302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76847-z.
7
A registered report on how implicit pro-rich bias is shaped by the perceiver's gender and socioeconomic status.一篇关于感知者的性别和社会经济地位如何塑造隐性亲富偏见的预注册报告。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Aug 26;7(8):191232. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191232. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Trust in everyday life.日常生活中的信任。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Jul;121(1):95-114. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000334. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Punishing the privileged: Selfish offers from high-status allocators elicit greater punishment from third-party arbitrators.惩罚权贵:来自高地位分配者的自私提议会引起第三方仲裁者更大的惩罚。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232369. eCollection 2020.
10
Social structure learning in human anterior insula.人类前脑岛的社会结构学习。
Elife. 2020 Feb 18;9:e53162. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53162.