Suppr超能文献

世界卫生组织欧洲区域内姑息医学流程专业化的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of specialization in palliative medicine processes within the World Health Organization European region.

作者信息

Centeno Carlos, Bolognesi Deborah, Biasco Guido

机构信息

The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Task Force on Physicians Specialisation in Palliative Medicine, Milan, Italy; ATLANTES Research Program, Institute for Culture and Society and Palliative Medicine Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Navarra, Spain.

The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Task Force on Physicians Specialisation in Palliative Medicine, Milan, Italy; Isabella Seràgnoli Foundation, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 May;49(5):861-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.10.019. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Palliative medicine (PM), still in the development phase, is a new, growing specialty aimed at caring for both oncology and non-oncology patients. There is still confusion about the training offered in the various European PM certification programs.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a detailed, comparative update and analysis of the PM certification process in Europe, including the different training approaches and their main features.

METHODS

Experts from each country completed an online survey addressing historical background, program name, training requirements, length of time in training, characteristic and content, official certifying institution, effectiveness of accreditation, and 2013 workforce capacity. We prepared a comparative analysis of the data provided.

RESULTS

In 2014, 18 of 53 European countries had official programs on specialization in PM (POSPM): Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Malta, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, and the U.K. Ten of these programs were begun in the last five years. The PM is recognized as a "specialty," "subspecialty," or "special area of competence," with no substantial differences between the last two designations. The certification contains the term "palliative medicine" in most countries. Clinical training varies, with one to two years being the most frequent duration. There is a clear trend toward establishing the POSPM as a mandatory condition for obtaining a clinical PM position in countries' respective health systems.

CONCLUSION

PM is growing as a specialization field in Europe. Processes leading to certification are generally long and require substantial clinical training. The POSPM education plans are heterogeneous. The European Association for Palliative Care should commit to establishing common learning standards, leading to additional European-based recognition of expertise in PM.

摘要

背景

姑息医学仍处于发展阶段,是一个新兴且不断发展的专业领域,旨在为肿瘤和非肿瘤患者提供护理。欧洲各国的姑息医学认证项目所提供的培训仍存在混淆之处。

目的

提供欧洲姑息医学认证过程的详细、比较性更新与分析,包括不同的培训方法及其主要特点。

方法

来自每个国家的专家完成了一项在线调查,内容涉及历史背景、项目名称、培训要求、培训时长、特点和内容、官方认证机构、认证有效性以及2013年的劳动力能力。我们对所提供的数据进行了比较分析。

结果

2014年,欧洲53个国家中有18个国家设有姑息医学专业化官方项目(POSPM):捷克共和国、丹麦、芬兰、法国、格鲁吉亚、德国、匈牙利、爱尔兰、以色列、意大利、拉脱维亚、马耳他、挪威、波兰、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚、斯洛伐克和英国。其中10个项目是在过去五年内启动的。姑息医学被认可为“专业领域”“亚专业领域”或“特殊能力领域”,后两个称谓之间没有实质性差异。在大多数国家,认证包含“姑息医学”一词。临床培训各不相同,最常见的时长为一到两年。在各国各自的卫生系统中,将POSPM确立为获得临床姑息医学职位的强制性条件的趋势明显。

结论

姑息医学在欧洲作为一个专业领域正在不断发展。导致认证的过程通常较长,且需要大量的临床培训。POSPM教育计划参差不齐。欧洲姑息治疗协会应致力于建立共同的学习标准,从而在欧洲获得对姑息医学专业知识的更多认可。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验