Iverson Katherine M, King Matthew W, Gerber Megan R, Resick Patricia A, Kimerling Rachel, Street Amy E, Vogt Dawne
National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Feb;28(1):79-82. doi: 10.1002/jts.21985. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
The 4-item Hurt/Insult/Threaten/Scream (HITS) tool accurately detects past-year intimate partner violence (IPV) among female Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients; however, it lacks a sexual IPV item. This study evaluated the accuracy of an extended HITS (E-HITS), which adds a sexual IPV item, in female VHA patients. A sample of 80 female U.S. veteran VHA patients in New England completed a mail survey (50.0% response rate) that included the 5-item E-HITS and the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS-2). Women were included if they were in an intimate relationship in the past year. The women averaged 49 years of age and 86.0% of the sample was White. Accuracy of the 4-item HITS was compared to the 5-item E-HITS, using the CTS-2 as the reference. There were 20 women (25.0%) who reported past-year IPV on the CTS-2. The receiver operator characteristic curves demonstrated that the HITS and E-HITS performed nearly identically at their optimal cutoff scores of 6 and 7, respectively. At these cutoff scores, the sensitivity of both tools was .75, 95% CI [.55, .95]. The specificities were similar; .83 for the HITS, 95% CI [.73, .92], and .82 for the E-HITS, 95% CI [.72, .90]. Including a sexual IPV item may be clinically beneficial; it also attains the same accuracy of case identification as the HITS.
包含伤害/侮辱/威胁/尖叫(HITS)4个条目的工具能够准确检测出过去一年中退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)女性患者遭受的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV);然而,该工具缺少针对性暴力形式的亲密伴侣暴力的条目。本研究评估了扩展版HITS(E-HITS,增加了针对性暴力形式的亲密伴侣暴力的条目)在VHA女性患者中的准确性。新英格兰地区80名美国退伍军人VHA女性患者样本完成了一项邮寄调查(回复率为50.0%),调查内容包括包含5个条目的E-HITS和修订版冲突策略量表(CTS-2)。如果女性在过去一年处于亲密关系中,则纳入研究。这些女性的平均年龄为49岁,样本中86.0%为白人。以CTS-2作为参考,将包含4个条目的HITS的准确性与包含5个条目的E-HITS进行比较。在CTS-2中,有20名女性(25.0%)报告在过去一年遭受过亲密伴侣暴力。接受者操作特征曲线表明,HITS和E-HITS在各自最佳临界值6和7时表现几乎相同。在这些临界值时,两种工具的敏感性均为0.75,95%置信区间为[0.55, 0.95]。特异性相似;HITS的特异性为0.83,95%置信区间为[0.73, 0.92],E-HITS的特异性为0.82,95%置信区间为[0.72, 0.90]。纳入针对性暴力形式的亲密伴侣暴力的条目可能在临床上有益;它在病例识别方面也能达到与HITS相同的准确性。