Suppr超能文献

院前时间对创伤患者预后的影响:一项系统综述。

The influence of prehospital time on trauma patients outcome: a systematic review.

作者信息

Harmsen A M K, Giannakopoulos G F, Moerbeek P R, Jansma E P, Bonjer H J, Bloemers F W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, VU university Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):602-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Time is considered an essential determinant in the initial care of trauma patients. Salient tenet of trauma care is the 'golden hour', the immediate time after injury when resuscitation and stabilization are perceived to be most beneficial. Several prehospital strategies exist regarding time and transport of trauma patients. Literature shows little empirical knowledge on the exact influence of prehospital times on trauma patient outcome. The objective of this study was to systematically review the correlation between prehospital time intervals and the outcome of trauma patients.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to May 19th, 2014. Studies reporting on prehospital time intervals for emergency medical services (EMS), outcome parameters and potential confounders for trauma patients were included. Two reviewers collected data and assessed the outcomes and risk of bias using the STROBE-tool. The primary outcome was the influence on mortality.

RESULTS

Twenty level III-evidence articles were considered eligible for this systematic review. Results demonstrate a decrease in odds of mortality for the undifferentiated trauma patient when response-time or transfer-time are shorter. On the contrary increased on-scene time and total prehospital time are associated with increased odds of survival for this population. Nevertheless rapid transport does seem beneficial for patients suffering penetrating trauma, in particular hypotensive penetratingly injured patients and patients with a traumatic brain injury.

CONCLUSION

Swift transport is beneficial for patients suffering neurotrauma and the haemodynamically unstable penetratingly injured patient. For haemodynamically stable undifferentiated trauma patients, increased on-scene-time and total prehospital time does not increase odds of mortality. For undifferentiated trauma patients, focus should be on the type of care delivered prehospital and not on rapid transport.

摘要

目的

时间被认为是创伤患者初始治疗中的一个重要决定因素。创伤治疗的一个重要原则是“黄金一小时”,即受伤后复苏和稳定被认为最有益的即时时间段。关于创伤患者的时间和转运存在几种院前策略。文献显示,关于院前时间对创伤患者预后的确切影响,实证知识较少。本研究的目的是系统评价院前时间间隔与创伤患者预后之间的相关性。

方法

从创刊至2014年5月19日,在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统评价。纳入报告紧急医疗服务(EMS)的院前时间间隔、创伤患者的结局参数和潜在混杂因素的研究。两名评价者收集数据,并使用STROBE工具评估结局和偏倚风险。主要结局是对死亡率的影响。

结果

20篇III级证据文章被认为符合本系统评价的条件。结果表明,对于未分化的创伤患者,当反应时间或转运时间较短时,死亡几率降低。相反,对于这一人群,现场时间和院前总时间的增加与生存几率的增加相关。然而,快速转运对于穿透性创伤患者,特别是低血压穿透伤患者和创伤性脑损伤患者似乎是有益的。

结论

快速转运对神经创伤患者和血流动力学不稳定的穿透伤患者有益。对于血流动力学稳定的未分化创伤患者,现场时间和院前总时间的增加不会增加死亡几率。对于未分化创伤患者,应关注院前提供的护理类型,而不是快速转运。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验