Ilyas Haariss, Place Howard, Puryear Aki
Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 May;28(4):E199-205. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000222.
Retrospective chart review.
To compare short-term clinical and radiographic complications between iliac screw (IS) and S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation techniques in the adult and pediatric populations.
Pelvic fixation with lumbosacral implants is in widespread practice with numerous indications. Several techniques for spinopelvic fixation have been described in the literature. Although the iliac screw technique is widely practiced, it presents several challenges, including the use of connectors, more lateral surgical dissection, and some complaints of pain over the posterior pelvis. The S2AI method has recently been proposed as an alternative technique that minimizes these complications.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 65 adult patients (43 IS, 22 S2AI) and 55 pediatric patients (40 IS/unit rod, 15 S2AI) in a consecutive series who underwent spinopelvic fixation. Acute, spinopelvic implant-related, and delayed complications, including persistent pain over the gluteal region occurring longer than 3 months postoperatively, were recorded from both clinical and radiographic encounters. Statistical analyses were performed among the adult and pediatric group, respectively, as well as a pooled cohort.
The adult cohort found an 18.6% absolute risk reduction (ARR) in implant loosening (P=0.029) and a 21.1% ARR (P=0.05) in late pain with the S2AI method. In the pediatric population, the S2AI method demonstrated a 22.2% ARR (P=0.049) in both occurrence of revision surgery secondary to spinopelvic implant failure and late pain. In the pooled cohort, the S2AI method had a 13% ARR (P=0.033) in acute infections, 18.1% ARR (P=0.003) in implant loosening, 14.5% ARR (P=0.009) in revision surgery, 18.7% ARR (P=0.015) in late pain, and a 10.8% ARR (P=0.031) in delayed wound issues.
The S2AI technique is associated with significantly less clinical and radiographic complications in both the pediatric and adult populations when compared with the iliac screws technique.
Level III.
回顾性图表审查。
比较成人和儿童群体中髂骨螺钉(IS)和S2翼髂骨(S2AI)螺钉固定技术的短期临床和影像学并发症。
腰骶部植入物的骨盆固定在临床上广泛应用,适应证众多。文献中描述了几种脊柱骨盆固定技术。虽然髂骨螺钉技术应用广泛,但它存在一些挑战,包括使用连接器、更外侧的手术解剖以及一些关于骨盆后部疼痛的主诉。最近有人提出S2AI方法作为一种可将这些并发症降至最低的替代技术。
我们回顾性分析了连续系列中65例接受脊柱骨盆固定的成年患者(43例IS,22例S2AI)和55例儿科患者(40例IS/单棒,15例S2AI)的病历。记录临床和影像学检查中急性、与脊柱骨盆植入物相关的以及延迟性并发症,包括术后3个月以上持续存在的臀区疼痛。分别在成人组和儿童组以及合并队列中进行统计分析。
在成人队列中,S2AI方法在植入物松动方面绝对风险降低了18.6%(P=0.029),在晚期疼痛方面绝对风险降低了21.1%(P=0.05)。在儿科人群中,S2AI方法在因脊柱骨盆植入物失败而进行翻修手术的发生率和晚期疼痛方面均显示绝对风险降低了22.2%(P=0.049)。在合并队列中,S2AI方法在急性感染方面绝对风险降低了13%(P=0.033),在植入物松动方面绝对风险降低了18.1%(P=0.003),在翻修手术方面绝对风险降低了14.5%(P=0.009),在晚期疼痛方面绝对风险降低了18.7%(P=0.015),在伤口延迟问题方面绝对风险降低了10.8%(P=0.031)。
与髂骨螺钉技术相比,S2AI技术在儿科和成人人群中临床和影像学并发症均显著减少。
三级。