Suppr超能文献

自我报告的心肺适能:心血管疾病死亡率和长寿风险的预测与分类——哥本哈根城市心脏研究的前瞻性调查

Self-reported cardiorespiratory fitness: prediction and classification of risk of cardiovascular disease mortality and longevity--a prospective investigation in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

作者信息

Holtermann Andreas, Marott Jacob Louis, Gyntelberg Finn, Søgaard Karen, Mortensen Ole Steen, Prescott Eva, Schnohr Peter

机构信息

The National Research Center for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark (A.H., O.S.M.).

The Copenhagen City Heart Study, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (J.L.M., E.P., P.S.).

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jan 27;4(1):e001495. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001495.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The predictive value and improved risk classification of self-reported cardiorespiratory fitness (SRCF), when added to traditional risk factors on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and longevity, are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 3843 males and 5093 females from the Copenhagen City Heart Study without CVD in 1991-1994 were analyzed using multivariate Cox hazards regression to assess the predictive value and survival benefit for CVD and all-cause mortality from SRCF. The category-free net reclassification improvement from SRCF was calculated at 15-year follow-up on CVD and all-cause mortality. Overall, 1693 individuals died from CVD. In the fully adjusted Cox model, those reporting the same (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.32) and lower (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.24) SRCF than peers had an increased risk of CVD mortality, compared with individuals with higher SRCF. Compared with individuals with higher SRCF, those with the same and lower SRCF had 1.8 (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.5) and 5.1 (95% CI, 4.1 to 6.2) years lower life expectancy, respectively. Individuals with lower SRCF had a significantly increased risk of CVD mortality, compared with individuals with higher SRCF, within each strata of leisure time physical activity and self-rated health, and SRCF significantly predicted CVD mortality independently of self-rated health and walking pace. A net reclassification improvement of 30.5% (95% CI, 22.1% to 38.9%) for CVD mortality was found when adding SRCF to traditional risk factors. Comparable findings were found for all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

SRCF has independent predictive value, is related to a considerable survival benefit, and improves risk classification when added to traditional risk factors of CVD and all-cause mortality. SRCF might prove useful in improved risk stratification in primary prevention.

摘要

背景

自我报告的心肺适能(SRCF)在添加到心血管疾病(CVD)和长寿的传统危险因素之上时,其预测价值及对风险分类的改善作用尚不清楚。

方法与结果

对哥本哈根城市心脏研究中1991 - 1994年无CVD的3843名男性和5093名女性进行分析,使用多变量Cox风险回归评估SRCF对CVD和全因死亡率的预测价值及生存获益。在对CVD和全因死亡率进行15年随访时,计算了SRCF的无类别净重新分类改善情况。总体而言,1693人死于CVD。在完全调整的Cox模型中,与SRCF较高的个体相比,报告的SRCF与同龄人相同(风险比[HR],1.17;95%置信区间[CI],1.04至1.32)及较低(HR,1.91;95% CI,1.62至2.24)的个体CVD死亡风险增加。与SRCF较高的个体相比,SRCF相同及较低的个体预期寿命分别缩短1.8年(95% CI,1.0至2.5)和5.1年(95% CI,4.1至6.2)。在休闲时间身体活动和自我健康评分的每个分层中,与SRCF较高的个体相比,SRCF较低的个体CVD死亡风险显著增加,且SRCF独立于自我健康评分和步行速度显著预测CVD死亡率。当将SRCF添加到传统危险因素时,发现CVD死亡率的净重新分类改善为30.5%(95% CI,22.1%至38.9%)。全因死亡率也有类似发现。

结论

SRCF具有独立的预测价值,与显著的生存获益相关,并且在添加到CVD和全因死亡率的传统危险因素时可改善风险分类。SRCF可能在初级预防中改善风险分层方面有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验