• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业性举重与高血压风险的关系,按抗高血压药物的使用情况和年龄分层——一项横断面和前瞻性队列研究。

Occupational lifting and risk of hypertension, stratified by use of anti-hypertensives and age - a cross-sectional and prospective cohort study.

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Occupational and Social Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, a part of Copenhagen University Hospital, Gl. Ringstedvej 4B, 4300, Holbæk, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10651-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-10651-w
PMID:33853574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8045338/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heavy occupational lifting is prevalent in the general working population and is sparsely reported to associate with hypertension, especially among older and hypertensive workers. We investigated if heavy occupational lifting is associated with hypertension and blood pressure (BP) in both cross-sectional and prospective study designs in the Copenhagen General Population Study, stratified by age, and use of anti-hypertensives.

METHODS

Participation was conducted following the declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethical committee (H-KF-01-144/01). By multivariable logistic and linear regression models, we investigated the association between heavy occupational lifting and hypertension, in a cross-sectional design (n = 67,363), using anti-hypertensives or BP ≥140/≥90 mmHg as outcome, and in a prospective design (n = 7020) with an above-median change in systolic BP (SBP) from baseline to follow-up and/or a shift from no use to use of anti-hypertensives as outcome, with and without stratification by age and use of anti-hypertensives.

RESULTS

The odds ratio for hypertension was estimated at 0.97 (99% CI: 0.93-1.00) in the cross-sectional analysis, and at 1.08 (99% CI: 0.98-1.19) in the prospective analysis. The difference in SBP among workers with versus without heavy occupational lifting was estimated at - 0.29 mmHg (99% CI -0.82 - 0.25) in the cross-sectional and at 1.02 mmHg (99% CI -0.41 - 2.45) in the prospective analysis. No significant interaction between heavy occupational lifting and age, nor use of anti-hypertensives were shown.

CONCLUSIONS

Only the prospective analysis indicated heavy occupational lifting to increase the risk of hypertension. Further research on the association between occupational lifting and hypertension are needed.

摘要

背景

重体力职业性举重在普通劳动人群中较为普遍,但很少有研究表明其与高血压相关,尤其是在年龄较大和患有高血压的劳动者中。我们通过哥本哈根普通人群研究的横断面和前瞻性研究设计,调查了重体力职业性举重与高血压及血压(BP)之间的关系,研究设计按年龄和抗高血压药物的使用情况进行分层。

方法

本研究遵循赫尔辛基宣言进行,并经伦理委员会批准(H-KF-01-144/01)。我们通过多变量逻辑回归和线性回归模型,在横断面设计(n=67363)中,以使用抗高血压药物或 BP≥140/≥90mmHg 为结局,在前瞻性设计(n=7020)中,以收缩压(SBP)从基线到随访时的中位数以上变化和/或从不使用抗高血压药物转变为使用抗高血压药物为结局,调查了重体力职业性举重与高血压之间的关联,并按年龄和抗高血压药物的使用情况进行分层。

结果

在横断面分析中,高血压的比值比估计为 0.97(99%CI:0.93-1.00),在前瞻性分析中为 1.08(99%CI:0.98-1.19)。有与无重体力职业性举重的劳动者之间的 SBP 差异估计值在横断面研究中为-0.29mmHg(99%CI:-0.82至-0.25),在前瞻性研究中为 1.02mmHg(99%CI:-0.41至 2.45)。未显示重体力职业性举重与年龄、抗高血压药物的使用之间存在显著交互作用。

结论

只有前瞻性分析表明重体力职业性举重会增加患高血压的风险。需要进一步研究职业性举重与高血压之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205d/8045338/1c67b6745ca7/12889_2021_10651_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205d/8045338/1c67b6745ca7/12889_2021_10651_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205d/8045338/1c67b6745ca7/12889_2021_10651_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Occupational lifting and risk of hypertension, stratified by use of anti-hypertensives and age - a cross-sectional and prospective cohort study.职业性举重与高血压风险的关系,按抗高血压药物的使用情况和年龄分层——一项横断面和前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10651-w.
2
Does occupational lifting affect the risk of hypertension? Cross-sectional and prospective associations in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.职业性举重是否会增加患高血压的风险?哥本哈根城市心脏研究的横断面和前瞻性关联。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 Mar 1;46(2):188-197. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3850. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
The Effect of Occupational Lifting on Hypertension Risk: Protocol for a Project Using Data From the Copenhagen City Heart Study.职业性举重对高血压风险的影响:一项使用哥本哈根城市心脏研究数据的项目方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 27;7(4):e93. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9692.
4
Association between exposure to heavy occupational lifting and cardiac structure and function: a cross-sectional analysis from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.职业性重体力劳动暴露与心脏结构和功能的关系:来自哥本哈根城市心脏研究的横断面分析。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;38(3):521-532. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02420-y. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
5
Trends in population blood pressure and determinant factors for population blood pressure.人群血压趋势及人群血压的决定因素
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
6
Association between blood pressure, the treatment of hypertension, and cardiovascular risk factors in women.女性的血压、高血压治疗与心血管危险因素之间的关联。
J Hypertens. 2000 Jul;18(7):833-41. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200018070-00003.
7
Survey on treatment of hypertension and implementation of World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension risk stratification in primary care in Belgium.比利时初级医疗中高血压治疗及世界卫生组织/国际高血压学会风险分层实施情况的调查
J Hypertens. 2002 Jul;20(7):1297-302. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200207000-00015.
8
Blood pressure categories and cardiovascular risk factors in Japan: the Jichi Medical School (JMS) Cohort Study.日本的血压类别与心血管危险因素:自治医科大学(JMS)队列研究
Hypertens Res. 2007 Jul;30(7):643-9. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.643.
9
Independent association of cognitive dysfunction with cardiac hypertrophy irrespective of 24-h or sleep blood pressure in older hypertensives.认知功能障碍与心脏肥大的独立相关性,与老年高血压患者 24 小时或睡眠血压无关。
Am J Hypertens. 2012 Jun;25(6):657-63. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2012.27. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
10
Single Agent Antihypertensive Therapy and Orthostatic Blood Pressure Behaviour in Older Adults Using Beat-to-Beat Measurements: The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing.使用逐搏测量法对老年人进行单药抗高血压治疗与直立性血压行为:爱尔兰纵向老龄化研究
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146156. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex disparities in physical activity domains and hypertension prevalence.身体活动领域的性别差异与高血压患病率
Clin Hypertens. 2024 Jan 2;30(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40885-023-00260-7.
2
Relationship between cumulative exposure to occupational lifting throughout working life and risk of ischemic heart disease in men and women. The Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank.职业性搬运的终生累积暴露与男性和女性缺血性心脏病风险之间的关系。哥本哈根衰老与中年生物银行。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Feb 20;68(2):109-121. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad077.
3
Different associations of occupational and leisure-time physical activity with the prevalence of hypertension among middle-aged community dwellers in rural Khánh Hòa, Vietnam.

本文引用的文献

1
Does occupational lifting affect the risk of hypertension? Cross-sectional and prospective associations in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.职业性举重是否会增加患高血压的风险?哥本哈根城市心脏研究的横断面和前瞻性关联。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 Mar 1;46(2):188-197. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3850. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
2
The "Extreme Exercise Hypothesis": Recent Findings and Cardiovascular Health Implications.“极限运动假说”:近期研究发现及其对心血管健康的影响
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Aug 28;20(10):84. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0674-3.
3
Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants.
不同职业和休闲时间体力活动与越南庆和省农村中年社区居民高血压患病率的相关性。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 19;23(1):713. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15631-w.
4
How Does Occupational Lifting Affect Ambulatory Blood Pressure, Relative Aerobic Workload and Level of Physical Activity?职业举重如何影响动态血压、相对有氧运动负荷和身体活动水平?
Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Jun 6;67(5):559-571. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad009.
高度活跃的体力劳动者是否会早逝?一项基于 193696 名参与者数据的系统回顾和荟萃分析
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Oct;52(20):1320-1326. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098540. Epub 2018 May 14.
4
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药学协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
5
Physical activity and 22-year all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality.身体活动与 22 年全因和冠心病死亡率。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Nov;60(11):976-990. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22756. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
6
The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does.体力活动悖论:职业体力活动(OPA)无法带来休闲时间体力活动所具有的心血管健康益处的六个原因。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;52(3):149-150. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097965. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
7
Impact of Changes in Cardiorespiratory Fitness on Hypertension, Dyslipidemia and Survival: An Overview of the Epidemiological Evidence.心肺适能变化对高血压、血脂异常和生存的影响:流行病学证据综述
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jun-Jul;60(1):56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
8
A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension.应对当前及未来几代人高血压全球负担的行动呼吁与生命历程策略:《柳叶刀》高血压委员会
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2665-2712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31134-5. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
9
Effects of smoking on central blood pressure and pressure amplification in hypertension of the young.吸烟对青年高血压患者中心血压及压力放大的影响。
Vasc Med. 2016 Oct;21(5):422-428. doi: 10.1177/1358863X16647509. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
Self-reported cardiorespiratory fitness: prediction and classification of risk of cardiovascular disease mortality and longevity--a prospective investigation in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.自我报告的心肺适能:心血管疾病死亡率和长寿风险的预测与分类——哥本哈根城市心脏研究的前瞻性调查
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jan 27;4(1):e001495. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001495.